EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Answer by Kyle J. Lucchese7
2
0
2

Hi, Eugene. 

Thank you for sharing some of your story. It has been nice speaking with you on a couple of occasions. 

Here are some opportunities that come to mind:

  1. I would start with LSE's Financial Support Office. Explain your situation and how this is impacting your participation at the University. They are the audience most likely to be sympathetic to your situation. 
  2. Open Philanthropy offers a couple of opportunities that may be relevant:
    1. As you are a university group organizer, you might consider applying for the University Organizer Fellowship.
    2. Given your academic interests, performance, and attendance at a top school, consider applying for the Undergraduate Scholarship. The application deadline is August 18.
  3. The UK has a great scholarship portal.
  4. You might also read more about support for students from Ukraine in UK higher education. 
  5. I am unsure of your status in the UK, but you may qualify for support through Student Action for Refugees (STAR).

Please do reach out if it would be beneficial. I wish you the best in your journey! 

Reply
meugen1
1
0

Thank you Kyle! I haven't come across some of the resources you sent and will definitely look into them. Thanks for the time you spent looking into it :)

Reply
See in context
by meugen
3 min read2 answers 0

15

Career choice
Frontpage

Hi everyone!

I’m Eugene, the current president of the LSE EA Society. Considering how supportive and diverse the EA community is, I decided to ask here about my current situation. The question is: Do you know of any grants/scholarships/funding opportunities for current undergraduate students (not necessarily EA related)? Below, I will explain my situation in detail.

I’m coming from Ukraine and finished high school in Odesa in 2021. After this, I started an undergraduate degree in Economics at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow (a double degree with the University of London). My main consideration for doing this was the high-quality education and opportunities opened after the degree while being affordable by my family. With the beginning of the war between Russia and Ukraine, I left the country and was moving around Europe for half a year.

Eventually, I was accepted to study Mathematics with Economics at the London School of Economics. Without funding, it was obvious that my family will not be able to afford it: my dad has been retired for the last 10 years (receives a pension of around 4000 GBP a year) and my mother didn’t work since my and my sister’s birth till the last year when she and my sister fled to Ireland where she started working at a kitchen (earned 2000 EUR a month, currently unemployed and learning English). Having savings from the time when my father worked, in the financial support application form I indicated that my family could provide me 4500 pounds annually. In the decision of the financial support office, I was informed that I’m awarded a scholarship of 18k pounds, leaving exactly 4500 of tuition AND covering my living costs myself.

The decision of the office was final, and I knew that we will not be able to find another 10k or more per year for living costs. However, I managed to find a host family for the first year and to save money by working part-time in the meanwhile. From October, I worked as a research analyst intern in a small M&A company and managed to save up around 8k pounds, sometimes by working more than 20h a week (LSE officially recommends no more than 15h of work). For the next year, I will flatshare with 2 other people, spending 850 pounds a month on rent excl. bills and other expenses. So even with the savings, I will have to work.

Through my first year of studies, I became involved with EA (I read 80k career guide in 2018 but haven’t engaged with EA after that) by completing Intro Fellowship, AGI Safety Fundamentals AI Alignment course, participated in the GCP X-Risks workshop and participated in 3 EAGx and EAG London. I’ve also been elected as the president of LSE EA for the next academic year. In the academic sense, I also have high results: first in all first-year courses, with 100/100 in Abstract Mathematics (regarded as one of the hardest first-year courses at LSE), 97/100 in Mathematical Methods, 95/100 in Statistics, and 83/100 in Macroeconomics (top 3% of the class). I’ve also engaged in various extracurricular activities, you can check some on my LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/eugene-shcherbinin/). Ensuring financial stability would allow me to focus on exploring future career paths of high impact and engaging in the projects that develop me the most (the current paths I’m considering are economic research, AI safety, and finance with a transfer to public finance).

For this reason, I decided to try to find some funding opportunities: even small grants of several thousand pounds could support me and ensure that I will be able to fund myself through the next two years. Some steps I’m going to undertake in the next couple of weeks are: apply for additional funding at LSE (unclear if I get it since the hardship fund is for those currently experiencing financial trouble, while I’m currently still living with the host family), apply to the OpenPhil’s undergraduate scholarship even though I’m not a standard applicant, research various websites with grants and scholarships.

I would really appreciate any grants you know about or general suggestions. Thank you very much!

15

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment


2 Answers sorted by
Top

Kyle J. Lucchese

7
2
0
2

Hi, Eugene. 

Thank you for sharing some of your story. It has been nice speaking with you on a couple of occasions. 

Here are some opportunities that come to mind:

  1. I would start with LSE's Financial Support Office. Explain your situation and how this is impacting your participation at the University. They are the audience most likely to be sympathetic to your situation. 
  2. Open Philanthropy offers a couple of opportunities that may be relevant:
    1. As you are a university group organizer, you might consider applying for the University Organizer Fellowship.
    2. Given your academic interests, performance, and attendance at a top school, consider applying for the Undergraduate Scholarship. The application deadline is August 18.
  3. The UK has a great scholarship portal.
  4. You might also read more about support for students from Ukraine in UK higher education. 
  5. I am unsure of your status in the UK, but you may qualify for support through Student Action for Refugees (STAR).

Please do reach out if it would be beneficial. I wish you the best in your journey! 

meugen1
1
0

Thank you Kyle! I haven't come across some of the resources you sent and will definitely look into them. Thanks for the time you spent looking into it :)

Reply

Wim

5
3
0

Hi Eugene! 
This seems like the kind of thing Tyler Cowen would support. He runs a program called emergent ventures, which funds the ambitions of bright talented young people like yourself. Here's the application link. Best of luck with everything. 

meugen2
0
0

Oh, that's a very interesting idea! I knew about Emergent Ventures but never thought of applying. Will definitely give it a try!

Reply
3
Sam Glover
I wrote an FAQ that may be helpful in your application, you can find it here. If you'd like to know anything else about the application process (or want help with anything else, such as having a fresh pair of eyes on your application), feel free to email me at samueljnglover@gmail.com.
1
meugen
Oh that's very helpful, thank you very much for offering your support :)
1
meugen
@Sam Glover sent you an email!
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
This is a crosspost for The Case for Insect Consciousness by Bob Fischer, which was originally published on Asterisk in January 2025. [Subtitle.] The evidence that insects feel pain is mounting, however we approach the issue. For years, I was on the fence about the possibility of insects feeling pain — sometimes, I defended the hypothesis;[1] more often, I argued against it.[2] Then, in 2021, I started working on the puzzle of how to compare pain intensity across species. If a human and a pig are suffering as much as each one can, are they suffering the same amount? Or is the human’s pain worse? When my colleagues and I looked at several species, investigating both the probability of pain and its relative intensity,[3] we found something unexpected: on both scores, insects aren’t that different from many other animals.  Around the same time, I started working with an entomologist with a background in neuroscience. She helped me appreciate the weaknesses of the arguments against insect pain. (For instance, people make a big deal of stories about praying mantises mating while being eaten; they ignore how often male mantises fight fiercely to avoid being devoured.) The more I studied the science of sentience, the less confident I became about any theory that would let us rule insect sentience out.  I’m a philosopher, and philosophers pride themselves on following arguments wherever they lead. But we all have our limits, and I worry, quite sincerely, that I’ve been too willing to give insects the benefit of the doubt. I’ve been troubled by what we do to farmed animals for my entire adult life, whereas it’s hard to feel much for flies. Still, I find the argument for insect pain persuasive enough to devote a lot of my time to insect welfare research. In brief, the apparent evidence for the capacity of insects to feel pain is uncomfortably strong.[4] We could dismiss it if we had a consensus-commanding theory of sentience that explained why the apparent evidence is ir
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
Introduction I have been writing posts critical of mainstream EA narratives about AI capabilities and timelines for many years now. Compared to the situation when I wrote my posts in 2018 or 2020, LLMs now dominate the discussion, and timelines have also shrunk enormously. The ‘mainstream view’ within EA now appears to be that human-level AI will be arriving by 2030, even as early as 2027. This view has been articulated by 80,000 Hours, on the forum (though see this excellent piece excellent piece arguing against short timelines), and in the highly engaging science fiction scenario of AI 2027. While my article piece is directed generally against all such short-horizon views, I will focus on responding to relevant portions of the article ‘Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion’ by Will MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse.  Rates of Growth The authors summarise their argument as follows: > Currently, total global research effort grows slowly, increasing at less than 5% per year. But total AI cognitive labour is growing more than 500x faster than total human cognitive labour, and this seems likely to remain true up to and beyond the point where the cognitive capabilities of AI surpasses all humans. So, once total AI cognitive labour starts to rival total human cognitive labour, the growth rate of overall cognitive labour will increase massively. That will drive faster technological progress. MacAskill and Moorhouse argue that increases in training compute, inference compute and algorithmic efficiency have been increasing at a rate of 25 times per year, compared to the number of human researchers which increases 0.04 times per year, hence the 500x faster rate of growth. This is an inapt comparison, because in the calculation the capabilities of ‘AI researchers’ are based on their access to compute and other performance improvements, while no such adjustment is made for human researchers, who also have access to more compute and other productivity enhancements each year.
 ·  · 21m read
 · 
Introduction ~440 billion shrimps are farmed each year [1]. This is over 5x the total number of all farmed land animals put together [2]. Many farmed shrimps suffer from conditions that can and should be addressed, such as poor water quality, high stocking densities, inhumane slaughter methods, and avoidable mutilations (such as eyestalk ablation) [3]. Shrimp Welfare Project is an organisation of people who believe that shrimps are capable of suffering and deserve our moral consideration [4]. We aim to cost-effectively reduce the suffering of billions of farmed shrimps. This post is essentially an expanded version of our 2025 Funding Proposal.  If you want the TL;DR version of this post, I'd recommend reading that. (Shr)Impact and Vision Shrimp Welfare Project has four workstreams, two of which we consider our Core or Foundational workstreams - those are Corporate Engagement and Farmer Support. Two more are relatively new, but we think they have a lot of potential, and those are Research & Policy, and Precision Welfare. For each workstream, I want to talk you through: * Our mission statement for the workstream * The problem we’re trying to solve through this workstream, * The strategy we’re taking to solve the problem, * The successes we’ve had so far * And our vision for 2030 Core: Corporate Engagement Catalysing industry-wide adoption of pre-slaughter stunning by buying and deploying electrical stunners to early adopters to build towards a tipping point that achieves critical mass. Problem (and Context) When we started Shrimp Welfare Project, we planned to originally work only directly with farmers. However, we soon became aware that unlike a lot of fish farming, which is often produced and consumed domestically, shrimps instead were bought and sold on the global market. In particular, most shrimps are farmed in the Global South (in places like Ecuador, India, and Vietnam), and then exported to countries in the Global North (such as those in Euro
Recent opportunities in Career choice
3
[Part-time AI Safety Research Program] MARS 3.0 Applications Open for Participants & Recruiting Mentors
Cambridge AI Safety Hub
· · 2m read
0
0
28
Apply to help run EAGxIndia 2025!
3 authors
· · 1m read
0
0
54
New Funding Round on Hardware-Enabled Mechanisms (HEMs)
2 authors
· · 18m read
0
0
View more