Conservation
•
Applied to What are your favourite videos to combat climate anxiety? ago
•
Applied to EA for Biodiversity: EcoResilience Initiative ago
•
Conservation refers to the long-term preservation of goods that would be difficult to replace or substitute. Most typically this will concern endangered species and biodiversity, but the category may also encompass the preservation of important information, cultures, well-preserved brains, or artifacts.
•
Applied to For Longtermism, Employ an Earth-Based Morality ago
•
Applied to [Cause Exploration Prizes] Data-Driven Wildlife Protection ago
•
Applied to The case for Green Growth skepticism and GDP agnosticism ago
•
Applied to Resilience & Biodiversity ago
Related entries
•
Applied to Why Genetic Rescue ago
•
Applied to EA Research Around Mineral Resource Exhaustion ago
Conservation refers to the long-term preservation of goods that would be difficult to replace or substitute. Most typically this will concern endangered species and biodiversity,biodiversity, but the category may also encompass the preservation of important information, cultures, well-preserved brains, or artifacts.
I'm sympathetic even though my background in technology and futurism has persistently drawn my attention away from things like this, so I might also be a bit clueless, but that might shed light on why we haven't discussed this much yet and I think we'd be very open to hosting those discussions and the associated communities.
I'd be super interested to see a historian or anthropologist attempt to estimate the moral weight of the preservation of cultural knowledge or artifacts, and weigh it against other work.
As a starting point... how many people should one be willing to kill to save the mona lisa? The answer that most people will give (we learn from the one absurd trolley problem level that was about that) is "none". This doesn't necessarily mean that the mona lisa isn't worth the millions that have been spent preserving it, but to me it does strongly suggest it and I don't know where to go from there... (It's always possible in surveys like this that the respondents are just being cowardly and aren't expressing their true values I guess...)
My current state of understanding about this problem area would be, like... Yeah I think we should digitize the hell out of everything then subsidize politically neutral permastorage practices, and from listening to Ada Palmer's podcast I've become aware that most ancient documents haven't been digitized yet? Which is interesting, but I also don't think digitizing them all before they rot will be especially difficult and is probably largely already happening? Analysis of the records can come much later and doesn't need funding right now, and if the scans are good, it's not obvious to me what the benefits are of keeping the physical objects in tact?
I'd guess that preserving, or recording living cultures is probably a lot more pressing and a lot more difficult. I want to see lots of recordings of artfully conducted interviews to capture cultural knowledge. I wish that most indigenous belief systems had not been destroyed by missionaries. I wish that they had been woven into a survivable syncretion of scientific industrial cultures so that they could have survived and contributed what they had. I'd be personally interested in working on that kind of thing.