There are prima facie strong reasons for a risk-neutral donor seeking to maximize the expected value of their donation to donate to only one charity. It may seem as though, if the donor believes their first dollar will do the most good if donated to some charity, they should also donate the second dollar to that charity, and so on until they run out of dollars to donate (Landsburg 1997).donate.[1]
Fourth, when a donor gives a very large amount, or gives to a very small charity, the donation will experience significant diminishing marginal returns, to the point where it is no longer the option with the highest [expected value](Expected value)expected value.
Landsburg, Steven E. (1997) Giving your all, Slate, January 11.A simple argument for donating to only one charity.
Snowden, James (2019) Should we give to more than one charity? In Effective altruism: Philosophical issues, edited byin Hilary Greaves and& Theron Pummer,Pummer (eds.) Effective Altruism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Press, pp. 69–79.
Landsburg, Steven E. (1997) Giving your all, Slate, January 11.
Onechoice a donor facesPhilanthropic diversification iswhetherthe practice of allocating donations todonate tomultiple charities rather than the single charity with the highest expectedvalue, or diversify their giving across a portfolio of different charities or focus areas.value.