Is there any justification of the "most"?
It's easy to list many social dilemmata that have been transformed by technology, but it would probably be equally easy to come up with a list of social dilemmata that are primarily solved through non-technological means, first and foremost through social norms and laws successfully solving similar problems.
Climate action is the most important thing, because it allows us to avoid the others.
(Working on climate)
Nuclear war seems by far the most consequential threat of those you mention here and the contribution of climate to nuclear war risk would need to be quite high to prioritize this over nuclear risk reduction (or climate and SAI together would need to be similarly important as nuclear war).
Do you think that climate change contributes more than, say, 10-20% to nuclear risk?
Thanks Vasco!
I agree that social dilemmata are not, by and large, solved through individuals spontaneously acting differently in isolation.
I think a fairer title of the piece could have been "economics needs more progress studies and more social science" given the vast differences in how well societies across time and space are solving coordination problems mediated (if not explained) by differences in institutions, norms, laws, etc.
The basic functioning of society -- the most important coordination problem of all -- varies widely across locales with the same technology.