Yes but I think their priority should be giving maximally effectively. So they should support giving where most effectively spreads the gospel. But probably that shouldn't be the only place that they give--the Bible seems to suggest it's very important to give to the poor, not just to evangelize to them.
I agree there's a very high degree of uncertainty. But I'd guess at maybe 58% odds that climate change will be bad in the long run. I'd imagine the aquatic impacts will largely rebound long term while the terrestrial ones will be long lasting. I agree there's high uncertianty, but sometimes it's worth acting on +ev actions even given loads of uncertainty.