Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸

Founder @ Pineapple Ops
7581 karmaJoined
vaidehiagarwalla.com

Bio

I care about making funding for high impact causes more robust & diversified. I'm based in the Bay Area, advise Asia-based community builders and run Pineapple Ops. I previously worked in consulting, recruiting and marketing, with a BA in Sociology and focused on social movements. (A little on my journey to EA)

Unless otherwise stated, I always write in a personal capacity.

/'vɛðehi/ or VEH-the-hee

Some posts I've written and particularly like: 

Advice I frequently give:

I'm always keen to hear feedback: admonymous.co/vaidehiagarwalla

How others can help me

If you feel I can do something (anything) better, please let me know. I want to be warm, welcoming & supportive - and I know I can fail to live up to those standards sometimes. Have a low bar for reaching out - (anonymous form here). 

If you think you have different views to me (on anything!), reach out -I want to hear more from folks with different views to me. If you have deep domain expertise in a very specific area (especially non-EA) I'd love to learn about it!

Connect me to fundraisers, product designers, people with ops & recruiting backgrounds and potential PA/ops folks! 

How I can help others

I can give specific feedback on movement building & meta EA project plans and career advising. 

I can also give feedback on posts and grant applications. 

Posts
65

Sorted by New

Sequences
6

Operations in EA FAQs
Events in EA: Learnings & Critiques
EA Career Advice on Management Consulting
Exploratory Careers Landscape Survey 2020
Local Career Advice Network
Towards A Sociological Model of EA Movement Building

Comments
695

Topic contributions
69

Recent example - an op ed piece on the AI safety pipeline having too many researchers is labelled community, a post advocating for more AI field building by an OP grant maker is not. 

Thanks for flagging those! I think my original point probably still stands regarding more projects for different species etc., since the incubated projects are from the existing recommended ideas list.

I noticed that AIM has  recommended 0 aquatic animal charities in 2026, 1 in 2025 and 0 in 2022-2024. 

Curious if either of you (or AIM researchers) have thoughts on why that is, and to what degree that is an indicator of a lack of high-EV, foundable (e.g. talent exists) projects in the space. 

Have not thought about compounding returns to orgs! I can think of some concrete examples with AIM ecosystem charities (e.g one org helping bring another into creation or creating a need for others to exist). Food for thought.

Curious how you see the communitarianism playing out in practice?

There's definitely a cooperative side to things that makes it a lot easier to ask for help amongst EAs than the relevant professional groups someone might be a part of, but not sure I'm seeing obvious implications.

So keen to hear from the disagrees (currently about 21% (5/23) votes) on which parts folks disagree with!

Yeah, and I can probably cite like 3-4 other prominent-ish articles. I think these efforts feel more like a bandaid and not like actually changing the fundamental core principles on which you do your thinking.

Very curious if you can describe the types of people you know, their profiles, what cause areas and roles they are have applied for, what constraints they have if any. 

But typically (not MECE, written quickly, not in order of importance, some combination could work etc.):

  • "Relentlessly resourceful" from Paul Graham covers a bunch of it better than I could
  • Strong intuitions for people management and org building (likely from experience)
  • Strong manager / leader
  • Gets shit done - can move quickly, decisive, keeps the momentum going, strong prioritization skills
  • Cares about structure and can implement systems, but only when they actually matter for helping the org achieve their goals
  • Able to switch between object level, in the weeds work and strategic thinking, and willing to do in the weeds work if needed (for earlier stage orgs)

The 'enable the org to succeed' implies 'at it's stated goals or mission'.

Like, the by the org or it's leaders own lights.

Load more