Note: This post aims to outline the concept of Lieux de Mémoire, by Pierre Nora, and raise some important questions stemming from it. Please feel free to share your own opinions on this topic too!

Pierre Nora describes lieux de mémoire—“sites of memory”—as places, symbols, or traditions where collective memory is stored. These can be physical (like Auschwitz), symbolic (like national anthems), or ritualistic (like Independence Day). They exist because real memory of what actually happened is no longer reflected in our world, and therefore this form of "constructed memory" is what exists.

However, constructed memory is heavily influenced by those in power. For instance, the omission of specific WW2 atrocities from educational textbooks and curricula or reconciliation efforts to address the past (Holocaust Memorial Museums) are condoned by the state. As a result, what we end up remembering or forgetting is heavily influenced by a constructed narrative. 

It then becomes important to familiarize ourselves with concepts that are beyond what is prevalent in our world, as a way to develop a more holistic understanding. Does this become a role for active citizens? Is collective forgetting more dangerous? I do think in a world of constructed narratives, asking these questions truly matters. What are your thoughts?