The way we have writer's block, I'm experiencing some form of block. Whether to call it an implementers block, a founders block or am I just overwhelmed?

Having attended the EAG London, I was so excited to continue conversations and move on with implementing many of my outlined activities. However, I haven't been able to get anything done. I haven't followed up on conversations, finished my updated work plan or reached out for potential support. 

Has anyone else experienced this? If yes, how did you deal with it?

4

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thanks for posting this - I certainly relate to something similar. But, it seems like you've taken a step in asking for support, so that's a great start :)) 

Do you have a sense at all of what might be blocking you, or if/why you've felt blocked on similar things before?

I'll share a few thoughts that might help based on my experience - they're not groundbreaking, but maybe just reading them might help name what's going on. 

If you're feeling overwhelmed... 
Does it feel like 'EAG followups' is a big amorphous task?
Try breaking things down into smaller, manageable chunks. I sometimes make two lists:

  • "Musts" (things I actually committed to do - like following up on specific promises)
  • "Nice to haves" (everything else that would be good but isn't urgent)

Then stop there. Making the list is one task. Starting on items is tomorrow's task. Sometimes just knowing what to do next helps me get over the hump.

You could just go through each 1-1 or session you went to and think about what followups might be good there and then prioritise them. If the tasks themselves seem big, like 'finish updated work plan' can you make them smaller? like fill in x section, send imperfect draft to a friend, look at comments from reviewer etc.

If something else is blocking you, maybe sit with the feeling for a bit and see what comes up? Common culprits for me after conferences in the past:

  • Imposter syndrome
  • Uncertainty about priorities
  • Social anxiety about following up
  • Perfectionism
  • Maybe you've just been tired from a busy weekend and travelling to the conference. Seems ok to prioritise rest for a bit afterwards if you can.  

Practical things that might help?

  • Focusmate or similar body-doubling tools
  • Setting a timer for 15 minutes to do just ONE follow-up email to get a bit of momentum
  • Messaging the easiest/friendliest person first to build momentum
  • Remember: people expect post-conference follow-ups to be delayed. You're not too late!
  • Some followup is better than no follow up. It's impossible to follow up on alllllll the potential EAG opportunities, just focus on making some steps.

Good luck with your next steps, Onyekachi!

Hi Charlotte, 

This was so warm to read. I'd try some of the practical things and hope they work for me too. Oh and Yes, the Imposter syndrome and the worry that I possibly didn't do as much as I needed really bothered me. So, thank you again for the insight. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 22m read
 · 
The cause prioritization landscape in EA is changing. Prominent groups have shut down, others have been founded, and everyone’s trying to figure out how to prepare for AI. This is the third in a series of posts critically examining the state of cause prioritization and strategies for moving forward. Executive Summary * An increasingly common argument is that we should prioritize work in AI over work in other cause areas (e.g. farmed animal welfare, reducing nuclear risks) because the impending AI revolution undermines the value of working in those other areas. * We consider three versions of the argument: * Aligned superintelligent AI will solve many of the problems that we currently face in other cause areas. * Misaligned AI will be so disastrous that none of the existing problems will matter because we’ll all be dead or worse. * AI will be so disruptive that our current theories of change will all be obsolete, so the best thing to do is wait, build resources, and reformulate plans until after the AI revolution. * We identify some key cruxes of these arguments, and present reasons to be skeptical of them. A more direct case needs to be made for these cruxes before we rely on them in making important cause prioritization decisions. * Even on short timelines, the AI transition may be a protracted and patchy process, leaving many opportunities to act on longer timelines. * Work in other cause areas will often make essential contributions to the AI transition going well. * Projects that require cultural, social, and legal changes for success, and projects where opposing sides will both benefit from AI, will be more resistant to being solved by AI. * Many of the reasons why AI might undermine projects in other cause areas (e.g. its unpredictable and destabilizing effects) would seem to undermine lots of work on AI as well. * While an impending AI revolution should affect how we approach and prioritize non-AI (and AI) projects, doing this wisel
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
TLDR When we look across all jobs globally, many of us in the EA community occupy positions that would rank in the 99.9th percentile or higher by our own preferences within jobs that we could plausibly get.[1] Whether you work at an EA-aligned organization, hold a high-impact role elsewhere, or have a well-compensated position which allows you to make significant high effectiveness donations, your job situation is likely extraordinarily fortunate and high impact by global standards. This career conversations week, it's worth reflecting on this and considering how we can make the most of these opportunities. Intro I think job choice is one of the great advantages of development. Before the industrial revolution, nearly everyone had to be a hunter-gatherer or a farmer, and they typically didn’t get a choice between those. Now there is typically some choice in low income countries, and typically a lot of choice in high income countries. This already suggests that having a job in your preferred field puts you in a high percentile of job choice. But for many in the EA community, the situation is even more fortunate. The Mathematics of Job Preference If you work at an EA-aligned organization and that is your top preference, you occupy an extraordinarily rare position. There are perhaps a few thousand such positions globally, out of the world's several billion jobs. Simple division suggests this puts you in roughly the 99.9999th percentile of job preference. Even if you don't work directly for an EA organization but have secured: * A job allowing significant donations * A position with direct positive impact aligned with your values * Work that combines your skills, interests, and preferred location You likely still occupy a position in the 99.9th percentile or higher of global job preference matching. Even without the impact perspective, if you are working in your preferred field and preferred country, that may put you in the 99.9th percentile of job preference
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Summary Following our co-founder Joey's recent transition announcement we're actively searching for exceptional leadership to join our C-level team and guide AIM into its next phase. * Find the full job description here * To apply, please visit the following link * Recommend someone you think could be a great fit here * Location: London strongly preferred. Remote candidates willing to work from London at least 3 months a year and otherwise overlapping at least 6 hours with 9 am to 5 pm BST will be considered. We are happy to sponsor UK work visas. * Employment Type: Full-time (35 hours) * Application Deadline: rolling until August 10, 2025 * Start Date: as soon as possible (with some flexibility for the right candidate) * Compensation: £45,000–£90,000 (for details on our compensation policy see full job description) Leadership Transition On March 15th, Joey announced he's stepping away from his role as CEO of AIM, with his planned last day as December 1st. This follows our other co-founder Karolina's completed transition in 2024. Like Karolina, Joey will transition to a board member role while we bring in new leadership to guide AIM's next phase of growth. The Opportunity AIM is at a unique inflection point. We're seeking an exceptional leader to join Samantha and Devon on our C-level team and help shape the next era of one of the most impactful organizations in the EA ecosystem. With foundations established (including a strong leadership team and funding runway), we're ready to scale our influence dramatically and see many exciting pathways to do so. While the current leadership team has a default 2026 strategic plan, we are open to a new CEO proposing radical departures. This might include: * Proposing alternative ways to integrate or spin off existing or new programs * Deciding to spend more resources trialling more experimental programs, or double down on Charity Entrepreneurship * Expanding geographically or deepening impact in existing region