Comment Permalink

I don't have a problem with this in principle—I think immigration restrictions in the US are unjustly restrictive. But I think there are many problems in practice. For example:

There are legal penalties for immigration marriage fraud, including 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Many EAs advise following the math when trying to improve welfare but caution against breaking any widely held social/moral/legal norms. Lying about the purpose of your marriage would certainly count as one of those norms.
While there might not be substantial monetary costs to marrying someone, there are social costs:
1. Without substantial time getting to know the immigrant you're marrying, you might not be familiar with their personality—they might be abusive or mentally unwell.
2. You won't be able to marry someone else who's more fitting for you romantically.
3. People who know you might disapprove of your dishonesty.

You say that this "plainly pencils out as optimal," but you don't provide the penciling. I think a full accounting of this decision would show that's it's probably unwise.

See in context

The Moral Duty To Marry An Immigrant

by Nicholas Decker

Mar 281 min read 2

-4

PhilosophyPolicyMoral philosophyUS policy

Personal Blog

This is a linkpost for https://nicholasdecker.substack.com/p/the-moral-duty-to-marry-an-immigrant

This is very short; I share it simply because I want more people thinking about it. US immigration law is extremely favorable to married couples. I think it woukd be possible for dedicated EAs to bring in thousands of people to the United States. This plainly pencils out as optimal, as it doesn’t even cost anything.

-4

Reactions

Comments2

Sorted by

New & upvoted

Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 9:57 PM

nathan98000Mar 303

I don't have a problem with this in principle—I think immigration restrictions in the US are unjustly restrictive. But I think there are many problems in practice. For example:

There are legal penalties for immigration marriage fraud, including 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Many EAs advise following the math when trying to improve welfare but caution against breaking any widely held social/moral/legal norms. Lying about the purpose of your marriage would certainly count as one of those norms.
While there might not be substantial monetary costs to marrying someone, there are social costs:
1. Without substantial time getting to know the immigrant you're marrying, you might not be familiar with their personality—they might be abusive or mentally unwell.
2. You won't be able to marry someone else who's more fitting for you romantically.
3. People who know you might disapprove of your dishonesty.

You say that this "plainly pencils out as optimal," but you don't provide the penciling. I think a full accounting of this decision would show that's it's probably unwise.

Matrice JacobineMar 284

Wait, I heard that one before...