There are some persons who perform exceptionally good deeds of showing kindness to others. Some of them are not bothered whether their deeds are recognised or not. Some get recognition by own efforts or those of others. Some don’t get any or due recognition. 

The reason why so many good deeds go unnoticed is that many of us have a weakness for celebrity worship. Once someone attains an exalted status by whatever means, the person is worshipped and people don’t bother much about others who have done good deeds. The weakness for celebrity worship is pervasive since many of us are happy with our ordinariness and respective comfort zones, and have no inclination to become special ourselves or to identify those who are special and learn about their accomplishments. 

Prior to or during the Second World War, four persons who protected many human lives from the impact of the Holocaust were: Oskar Schindler, Nicholas Winton, Trevor Chadwick, and Maharaja Digvijaysinhji Ranjitsinhji Jadeja (affectionately called Jam Sahib). 

Oskar Schindler’s name is familiar to many because of the 1993 film, Schindler’s List. Winton, Chadwick, and the Maharaja are sometimes referred as the British Schindler, the Purbeck Schindler, and the Indian Schindler respectively, but their acts stand out as unique as that of Oskar Schindler. People knew about Winton only after a BBC programme in 1988. Chadwick, who helped Winton and termed by Winton as the real hero, got recognition only in August 2022. Many people may not have heard of the Maharaja. 

Oskar Schindler

In 1935, when Germany invaded Poland, Schindler set up an enamelware factory there, employing a combination of Jewish forced labourers and free Polish workers. His initial interest was making money, but later he wanted to take care of his Jewish workers. He used bribes and personal diplomacy to save about 1200 Jewish workers from being deported to a concentration camp. He added an armaments manufacturing division to his company to claim that the Jewish workers were essential for the war effort and got it designated as a subcamp. 

Schindler faced both risk and cost to protect his Jewish workers. He was suspected of unauthorised aid to them and was arrested thrice, but could not be charged. He produced bogus production figures to justify the existence of the subcamp as an armament factory. He left the place only after the Soviet troops liberated the camp in 1945. In 1949 he migrated to Argentina and returned to Germany in 1957. When he died in 1974, he was penniless and almost unknown. 

In 1993, he and his wife were awarded the title ‘Righteous Among the Nations’ by Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center. Also in 1993, the US Holocaust Memorial Council posthumously presented the Museum’s Medal of Remembrance to him.  [https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/oskar-schindler

Nicholas Winton

He was a London stockbroker. In 1938, when he was 29 years old, he wanted to go to Switzerland on a skiing trip, but went to Czechoslovakia with his friend who was helping people escape from that country before Nazi occupation. Others were helping elderly people to escape, and he was asked if he could help Czech children to escape. He set up an office in a hotel accepting names of children to be sent to England. He returned to England to make arrangements for families who would accept the children. He made arrangements for their settlement raising funds for the cost of travel, paying bribes for allowing the passage of trains and £50 for each child that was required as a deposit by the British government in case of need, and doing all the paperwork, sometimes even forging documents. Trevor Chadwick, a school teacher in England, agreed to be in charge of the office in Prague and make arrangements for transporting the children to England. In 1939, eight train loads carried 669 children, mostly Jewish, to England via Germany. The ninth train with 250 children could not leave Czechoslovakia since the Second World War broke out the same day. 

For nearly fifty years, Winton told no one about this, not even his wife, since he thought that others won’t be much interested in what he did. In 1987, he met a publisher’s wife, a holocaust historian, and gave the thick scrapbook he was having which contained details of the children. 

She got the story published in a British newspaper. The story attracted the attention of a BBC presenter, who arranged a surprise programme in 1988 in two instalments inviting the rescued children whom they could contact and Winton himself. None of them knew the purpose. The presenter, after mentioning about the scrapbook and introducing two of the recued children, asks all those who were rescued by Winton to stand up. When all of them stand up, Winton is asked to turn around to see the now grown-up children, a pleasant surprise to all and a pleasant viewing for the audience.

He received many honours that include:

  • In 1991, he was awarded the Freedom of the City when he visited Prague, Czech Republic.
  • In 2003, he received knighthood from the Queen and so he is referred as Sir Nicholas Winton.
  • In 2014, he was awarded the order of White Lion by the President of the Czech Republic.

He passed away in 2015, aged 106.

[https://sounds.bl.uk/related-content/TRANSCRIPTS/021I-C0410X0094XX-ZZZZA0.pdf

Recognition - 1988 - Sir Nicholas Winton Exhibition 

https://www.nicholaswinton.com/]

 

Trevor Chadwick

As mentioned above, Chadwick stayed back in Prague to orgamise the transportation of the Czech children to England via Germany, while Winton was working at the England end. Chadwick was to deal with paying bribes where required, and making arrangements for the safe travel of the children on the eight trains that transported them. 

Winton said that Chadwick faced more risk than himself and so was the real hero. However, Chadwick’s contribution was not recognised till August 2022, when a bronze statue was unveiled in his hometown, Purbeck. It is surprising that nothing is known about what the rescued Czech children said about him while a lot has been made known of the words of gratitude they expressed to Winton. 

[https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-dorset-62686207]

 

Maharaja Digvijaysinhji Ranjitsinhji Jadeja

When Germany invaded the USSR in 1941, the latter released Polish exiles from its labour camps. The first Prime Minister of the Polish Government-in-Exile requested the British Prime Minister to protect the starving young Polish children. India, then a British colony, was suggested as a destination. 

The Maharaja of Jamnagar decided to help the refugees. He donated liberally and raised the huge amount of Rs. 6,00,000 from other Princely colleagues and private donations. He built refugee camps in Balachadi (near his capital city) housing 1,200 Polish orphans and fully funded by him; and in Kolhapur, Bandra, Chela, and Panchgani, housing around 15,000 Polish citizens.

When the first batch of malnourished and exhausted orphans arrived in Nawanagar, he welcomed them saying: ‘Don’t consider yourselves as orphans. I am Bapu, the father of all Nawanagaris, including yourselves.’

In Balachadi he made arrangements for their education, medical facilities, and rest and recuperation. He received several honours that include:

  • There is a ‘Good Maharaja Square’ in Warsaw.
  • Six private schools in Warsaw were named after him.
  • He was awarded the President’s Medal, Poland’s highest honour.

[https://forceindia.net/guest-column/guts-grit-and-glory/indian-schindler-jamnagar/]

6

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I enjoyed reading these examples; thanks for writing them up.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
At the last EAG Bay Area, I gave a workshop on navigating a difficult job market, which I repeated days ago at EAG London. A few people have asked for my notes and slides, so I’ve decided to share them here.  This is the slide deck I used.   Below is a low-effort loose transcript, minus the interactive bits (you can see these on the slides in the form of reflection and discussion prompts with a timer). In my opinion, some interactive elements were rushed because I stubbornly wanted to pack too much into the session. If you’re going to re-use them, I recommend you allow for more time than I did if you can (and if you can’t, I empathise with the struggle of making difficult trade-offs due to time constraints).  One of the benefits of written communication over spoken communication is that you can be very precise and comprehensive. I’m sorry that those benefits are wasted on this post. Ideally, I’d have turned my speaker notes from the session into a more nuanced written post that would include a hundred extra points that I wanted to make and caveats that I wanted to add. Unfortunately, I’m a busy person, and I’ve come to accept that such a post will never exist. So I’m sharing this instead as a MVP that I believe can still be valuable –certainly more valuable than nothing!  Introduction 80,000 Hours’ whole thing is asking: Have you considered using your career to have an impact? As an advisor, I now speak with lots of people who have indeed considered it and very much want it – they don't need persuading. What they need is help navigating a tough job market. I want to use this session to spread some messages I keep repeating in these calls and create common knowledge about the job landscape.  But first, a couple of caveats: 1. Oh my, I wonder if volunteering to run this session was a terrible idea. Giving advice to one person is difficult; giving advice to many people simultaneously is impossible. You all have different skill sets, are at different points in
 ·  · 47m read
 · 
Thank you to Arepo and Eli Lifland for looking over this article for errors.  I am sorry that this article is so long. Every time I thought I was done with it I ran into more issues with the model, and I wanted to be as thorough as I could. I’m not going to blame anyone for skimming parts of this article.  Note that the majority of this article was written before Eli’s updated model was released (the site was updated june 8th). His new model improves on some of my objections, but the majority still stand.   Introduction: AI 2027 is an article written by the “AI futures team”. The primary piece is a short story penned by Scott Alexander, depicting a month by month scenario of a near-future where AI becomes superintelligent in 2027,proceeding to automate the entire economy in only a year or two and then either kills us all or does not kill us all, depending on government policies.  What makes AI 2027 different from other similar short stories is that it is presented as a forecast based on rigorous modelling and data analysis from forecasting experts. It is accompanied by five appendices of “detailed research supporting these predictions” and a codebase for simulations. They state that “hundreds” of people reviewed the text, including AI expert Yoshua Bengio, although some of these reviewers only saw bits of it. The scenario in the short story is not the median forecast for any AI futures author, and none of the AI2027 authors actually believe that 2027 is the median year for a singularity to happen. But the argument they make is that 2027 is a plausible year, and they back it up with images of sophisticated looking modelling like the following: This combination of compelling short story and seemingly-rigorous research may have been the secret sauce that let the article to go viral and be treated as a serious project:To quote the authors themselves: It’s been a crazy few weeks here at the AI Futures Project. Almost a million people visited our webpage; 166,00
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- > Despite setbacks, battery cages are on the retreat My colleague Emma Buckland contributed (excellent) research to this piece. All opinions and errors are mine alone. It’s deadline time. Over the last decade, many of the world’s largest food companies — from McDonald’s to Walmart — pledged to stop sourcing eggs from caged hens in at least their biggest markets. All in, over 2,700 companies globally have now pledged to go cage-free. Good things take time, and companies insisted they needed a lot of it to transition their egg supply chains — most set 2025 deadlines to do so. Over the years, companies reassured anxious advocates that their transitions were on track. But now, with just seven months left, it turns out that many are not. Walmart backtracked first, blaming both its customers and suppliers, who “have not kept pace with our aspiration to transition to a full cage-free egg supply chain.” Kroger soon followed suit. Others, like Target, waited until the last minute, when they could blame bird flu and high egg prices for their backtracks. Then there are those who have just gone quiet. Some, like Subway and Best Western, still insist they’ll be 100% cage-free by year’s end, but haven’t shared updates on their progress in years. Others, like Albertsons and Marriott, are sharing their progress, but have quietly removed their pledges to reach 100% cage-free. Opportunistic politicians are now getting in on the act. Nevada’s Republican governor recently delayed his state’s impending ban on caged eggs by 120 days. Arizona’s Democratic governor then did one better by delaying her state’s ban by seven years. US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins is trying to outdo them all by pushing Congress to wipe out all stat