Turkey-Syria earthquake: 'Reports of clashes' prompt some aid organisations  to pause rescue work | World News | Sky News

 

I saw the outpouring of support across the world. It was heartwarming. Faith in humanity is restored. As the days went by, pleas from people in Northern Syria (5M+ people) bombarded Twitter. Not a single external aid team had arrived yet! How is this possible? We saw the press releases and the pictures. Algeria, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Bahrain, UAE, Lebanon, and Iraq have all sent rescue teams and planes full of food, meds, and equipment. Oh yes, I remember now, they arrived at Al-Assad's airports. 

Remember the person who has killed over 300,000 civilians in the past decade? Yes. The same regime that drops barrel bombs for breakfast and operates slaughterhouses that make Guantanamo look like a holiday destination. They're now entrusted to "deliver aid" to the Syrian people. One can't escape the cynical thought that these countries' regimes took advantage of this circumstance to grease the wheel with Al-Assad.

 

The UN "security" council's blockade of all aid to northern (rebel-controlled) Syria meant that the only path into the earthquake-affected zones was through Bab al-Hawa crossing on the Turkish border. The widespread damage to road infrastructure leading up to the border delayed things. It took more than 72 hours for the first UN caravan to arrive. Saudi's aid among others arrived on day 4. No amount of infrastructure damage excuses this negligence. The coming days and weeks will likely reveal the thousands of deaths that could have been prevented. 

I'm not brushing off the large-scale damages and human suffering in Turkey and I urge individuals to support in every way. I wanted to point out the stark differences in response between neighboring regions that are only separated by a land border. Thousands of volunteers were on-scene in Turkey just a few hours later. Erdogan announced round-the-clock search, rescue, and medical support, monetary compensation, and thousands of free hotel rooms for survivors. The Syrian regions controlled by Al-Assad and Iranian militias received minimal support. Northern Syria was left in the dust.

 

This failure from the international community is not the first nor will it be the last. The Syrian people continue to be neglected as more allies leave them stranded. Just like with Afghans and Iraqis, people's hopelessness translates into inaction. As effective altruists, we pride ourselves on identifying neglected problems and communities. We believe in the power of activism as well as the power of the dollar. I'm not well versed in the former but I can point toward two organizations that are effective with the latter.

  1. Syria civil defense (The white helmets): A volunteer team of 3,000 people who form the largest search & rescue team in rebel-controlled Syria (5M+ people) which, to this day, gets bombarded by the Assad regime. You may have seen the Netflix documentary on this brave team. They managed to save 120,000+ lives since the start of Al-Assad's assault.  Here's an excerpt from their website:               "Our work saving lives and documenting war crimes have made us high-profile targets for the Syrian Regime and Russia. They have bombed White Helmet centers more than 350 times. 282 volunteers have been killed since 2013, more than half of these in double-tap strikes, where warplanes return to the site of an attack in order to bomb White Helmet volunteers who have rushed to the scene to rescue civilians. In areas where the Syrian regime has retaken control our volunteers are hunted down and detained"
  2. Molhamteam: One of the few non-profits dedicated to Syrian refugees. A relatively transparent young team of volunteers and full-time staff with strong social media presence and 10+ years of experience under their belt. They are slowly adding long-term solutions like building permanent homes for internally displaced people but given the limited funding, donations are mostly dedicated to humanitarian emergencies.

 

I hope you found this helpful. 

15

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments3


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I was also bothered by this neglect. Donated 25$ to the White Helmets.

Thanks for this passionate post. Because of it I also donated to the White Helmets. For other readers I would suggest also considering Doctors Without Borders, but in general I have a lot of uncertainty about how best to help.

Oh my gosh, this is so heartbreaking. I never knew about the Syria  situation, thanks for sharing this. Unfortunately I'm unable to donate but I will definitely share this among my network. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
Regulation cannot be written in blood alone. There’s this fantasy of easy, free support for the AI Safety position coming from what’s commonly called a “warning shot”. The idea is that AI will cause smaller disasters before it causes a really big one, and that when people see this they will realize we’ve been right all along and easily do what we suggest. I can’t count how many times someone (ostensibly from my own side) has said something to me like “we just have to hope for warning shots”. It’s the AI Safety version of “regulation is written in blood”. But that’s not how it works. Here’s what I think about the myth that warning shots will come to save the day: 1) Awful. I will never hope for a disaster. That’s what I’m trying to prevent. Hoping for disasters to make our job easier is callous and it takes us off track to be thinking about the silver lining of failing in our mission. 2) A disaster does not automatically a warning shot make. People have to be prepared with a world model that includes what the significance of the event would be to experience it as a warning shot that kicks them into gear. 3) The way to make warning shots effective if (God forbid) they happen is to work hard at convincing others of the risk and what to do about it based on the evidence we already have— the very thing we should be doing in the absence of warning shots. If these smaller scale disasters happen, they will only serve as warning shots if we put a lot of work into educating the public to understand what they mean before they happen. The default “warning shot” event outcome is confusion, misattribution, or normalizing the tragedy. Let’s imagine what one of these macabrely hoped-for “warning shot” scenarios feels like from the inside. Say one of the commonly proposed warning shot scenario occurs: a misaligned AI causes several thousand deaths. Say the deaths are of ICU patients because the AI in charge of their machines decides that costs and suffering would be minimize
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
This is a transcript of my opening talk at EA Global: London 2025. In my talk, I challenge the misconception that EA is populated by “cold, uncaring, spreadsheet-obsessed robots” and explain how EA principles serve as tools for putting compassion into practice, translating our feelings about the world's problems into effective action. Key points:  * Most people involved in EA are here because of their feelings, not despite them. Many of us are driven by emotions like anger about neglected global health needs, sadness about animal suffering, or fear about AI risks. What distinguishes us as a community isn't that we don't feel; it's that we don't stop at feeling — we act. Two examples: * When USAID cuts threatened critical health programs, GiveWell mobilized $24 million in emergency funding within weeks. * People from the EA ecosystem spotted AI risks years ahead of the mainstream and pioneered funding for the field starting in 2015, helping transform AI safety from a fringe concern into a thriving research field. * We don't make spreadsheets because we lack care. We make them because we care deeply. In the face of tremendous suffering, prioritization helps us take decisive, thoughtful action instead of freezing or leaving impact on the table. * Surveys show that personal connections are the most common way that people first discover EA. When we share our own stories — explaining not just what we do but why it matters to us emotionally — we help others see that EA offers a concrete way to turn their compassion into meaningful impact. You can also watch my full talk on YouTube. ---------------------------------------- One year ago, I stood on this stage as the new CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism to talk about the journey effective altruism is on. Among other key messages, my talk made this point: if we want to get to where we want to go, we need to be better at telling our own stories rather than leaving that to critics and commentators. Since
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
A friend of mine who worked as a social worker in a hospital told me a story that stuck with me. She had a conversation with an in-patient having a very difficult time. It was helpful, but as she was leaving, they told her wistfully 'You get to go home'. She found it hard to hear—it felt like an admonition. It was hard not to feel guilt over indeed getting to leave the facility and try to stop thinking about it, when others didn't have that luxury. The story really stuck with me. I resonate with the guilt of being in the fortunate position of being able to go back to my comfortable home and chill with my family while so many beings can't escape the horrible situations they're in, or whose very chance at existence depends on our work. Hearing the story was helpful for dealing with that guilt. Thinking about my friend's situation it was clear why she felt guilty. But also clear that it was absolutely crucial that she did go home. She was only going to be able to keep showing up to work and having useful conversations with people if she allowed herself proper respite. It might be unfair for her patients that she got to take the break they didn't, but it was also very clearly in their best interests for her to do it. Having a clear-cut example like that to think about when feeling guilt over taking time off is useful. But I also find the framing useful beyond the obvious cases. When morality feels all-consuming Effective altruism can sometimes feel all consuming. Any spending decision you make affects how much you can donate. Any activity you choose to do takes time away from work you could be doing to help others. Morality can feel as if it's making claims on even the things which are most important to you, and most personal. Often the narratives with which we push back on such feelings also involve optimisation. We think through how many hours per week we can work without burning out, and how much stress we can handle before it becomes a problem. I do find that