Hi Tosin, 

We are currently reviewing applications and you will get a response in due course. We apologize for any inconvenience.  

That was nice 

This is a great stride in the right direction. Looking forward to your exploration of the Africa Tech Space.

A quick question, how do you plan on bringing the seeming lack of government collaboration with this type of project especially in some parts of Africa?

There is no link for the application of the EA South Africa Summits in Cape Town. 

Is that due to error or the registration is not open yet? 

It seems I get the knack of it now... 

So your argument here is that if we are going to go this route, then interpretability technology should be used as a measure  in the future towards ensuring the safety of this agentic AI as much as they are using currently to improve their "planning capabilities"  

Can you clarify this a bit "Only if the safety/alignment work applies directly to the future maximiser AIs (for example, by allowing us to understand them) does it seem very advantageous to me."

Kind of lost here

So, it is not a question of whether or not, it is a question of how best to carry out those systemic changes. 

Thanks, this is a clarity comes knocking at the right time 

I seem a little bit off here, care a bit to expand more on your thoughts and ambit of GCR here? 

I understand the reservation about donation from AI companies cause of conflict of interest, but I still think the larger driver of this intervention area (AI Cause Area) should largely be this Company... who else got the fund that could drive it? who else get the ideological initiatives necessary for changes in this area? 

While it may be counterintuitive to have them on board, they are still the best bet for now. 

Yet to happen... The timeline is September and the application is still open.