It is possible to rationally prioritise between causes without engaging deeply on philosophical issues
I don't think basic cost/benefit analysis requires enormous engagement with philosophy. People do it off the cuff all the time - just need to introduce them to the idea in the charitable context.
I'm thinking of it similar to basic econ: people don't need to know a lot of price theory to be able to generally optimize their consumption.
I don't think basic cost/benefit analysis requires enormous engagement with philosophy. People do it off the cuff all the time - just need to introduce them to the idea in the charitable context.
I'm thinking of it similar to basic econ: people don't need to know a lot of price theory to be able to generally optimize their consumption.