I mean generally energy is a universal factor in cost of living.

Lowering costs of living while not getting rid of jobs has the most universal appeal with least political opposition anywhere - that's my general point.

Each country and each marginal dollar can lower the cost of living for each constituency's allocatable marginal dollar.

That's a good point.

I'm not familiar with why Conservatives are anti-wind and anti-solar. What are these arguments?

Here's Grok: https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_4a7c7d26-dd4f-4e4e-aaf3-3605d888de44

Producing more electrons is a known engineering problem; while education and healthcare are human problems, so I don't know if these are directly comparable.

Comment Placeholder to Add commentary about Governance, Status, and Power.

Comment Placeholder to Add commentary about:

What is Value?

Sub topics:

• Real vs. Nominal Growth
• At the end of the day, input = output

Comment Placeholder to Add commentary about

https://moores.samaltman.com/