AI safety + community health
Here's a LI post series:
-https://www.linkedin.com/posts/christians-for-impact_top-questions-to-ask-before-making-a-career-activity-7378817376802287616-N9RW?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABBfKAYBL-dwrMYafLIlwWQe6mqrTT0f8FU
-https://www.linkedin.com/posts/christians-for-impact_4-more-questions-to-ask-yourself-before-making-activity-7379172018287714304-6fcp?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABBfKAYBL-dwrMYafLIlwWQe6mqrTT0f8FU
When hiring teams delay decisions for weeks or reject without feedback, they aren't just reducing their chances of hiring their #1 – they're increasing the likelihood that their #5, #6, or #7 give up on working in the space at all.
I've advised ~hundreds of jobseekers trying to enter similar roles, and can vouch for this author as being both highly capable and, unfortunately, dead on. This is a collective cost paid by both the candidates and the ecosystem, which 1) loses bright people and 2) takes a hit to the broader reputation.
Under very difficult constraints – which many hiring teams are – it still may be that delaying or denying feedback is the right call. But it's costly, and I'm sorry @AnotherEAJobSeeker that you've been put in this situation multiple times.
With this upgrade, I feel significantly more comfortable referring the site to professionals getting started in AI safety. Great work!