Hide table of contents

Ahead of the AI Safety Summit starting in the UK next week, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak gave a speech talking about AI Safety and the UK's AI plans (including the AI Safety Institute and the AI Safety Summit). He expresses concerns over catastrophic misuse and the risk of humanity losing control over artificial intelligence.

Here's the transcript, highlights are mine:

I’m delighted to be here at the Royal Society, the place where the story of modern science has been written for centuries.

Now, I’m unashamedly optimistic about the power of technology to make life better for everyone.

So, the easy speech for me to give - the one in my heart I really want to give would be to tell you about the incredible opportunities before us.

Just this morning, I was at Moorfields Eye Hospital.

They’re using Artificial Intelligence to build a model that can look at a single picture of your eyes and not only diagnose blindness, but predict heart attacks, strokes, or Parkinson’s.

And that’s just the beginning.

I genuinely believe that technologies like AI will bring a transformation as far-reaching as the industrial revolution, the coming of electricity, or the birth of the internet.

Now, as with every one of those waves of technology, AI will bring new knowledge new opportunities for economic growth, new advances in human capability and the chance to solve problems that we once thought beyond us.

But like those waves, it also brings new dangers and new fears.

So, the responsible thing for me to do – the right speech for me to make – is to address those fears head on giving you the peace of mind that we will keep you safe while making sure you and your children have all the opportunities for a better future that AI can bring.

Now, doing the right thing, not the easy thing, means being honest with people about the risks from these technologies.

So, I won’t hide them from you.

That’s why today, for the first time, we’ve taken the highly unusual step of publishing our analysis on the risks of AI including an assessment by the UK intelligence communities.

These reports provide a stark warning.

Get this wrong, and AI could make it easier to build chemical or biological weapons.

Terrorist groups could use AI to spread fear and destruction on an even greater scale.

Criminals could exploit AI for cyber-attacks, disinformation, fraud, or even child sexual abuse.

And in the most unlikely but extreme cases, there is even the risk that humanity could lose control of AI completely through the kind of AI sometimes referred to as ‘super intelligence’.

Indeed, to quote the statement made earlier this year by hundreds of the world’s leading AI experts:

“Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war”.

Now, I want to be completely clear:

This is not a risk that people need to be losing sleep over right now.

I don’t want to be alarmist.

And there is a real debate about this - some experts think it will never happen at all.

But however uncertain and unlikely these risks are, if they did manifest themselves, the consequences would be incredibly serious.

And when so many of the biggest developers of this technology themselves warn of these risks leaders have a responsibility to take them seriously, and to act.

And that is what I am doing today – in three specific ways.

First, keeping you safe.

Right now, the only people testing the safety of AI are the very organisations developing it.

Even they don’t always fully understand what their models could become capable of.

And there are incentives in part, to compete to build the best models, quickest.

So, we should not rely on them marking their own homework, as many of those working on this would agree.

Not least because only governments can properly assess the risks to national security.

And only nation states have the power and legitimacy to keep their people safe.

The UK’s answer is not to rush to regulate.

This is a point of principle – we believe in innovation, it’s a hallmark of the British economy so we will always have a presumption to encourage it, not stifle it. 

And in any case, how can we write laws that make sense for something we don’t yet fully understand?

So, instead, we’re building world-leading capability to understand and evaluate the safety of AI models within government.

To do that, we’ve already invested £100m in a new taskforce more funding for AI safety than any other country in the world.

And we’ve recruited some of the most respected and knowledgeable figures in the world of AI.

So, I’m completely confident in telling you the UK is doing far more than other countries to keep you safe.

And because of this – because of the unique steps we’ve already taken – we’re able to go even further today.

I can announce that we will establish the world’s first AI Safety Institute – right here in the UK.

It will advance the world’s knowledge of AI safety. 

And it will carefully examine, evaluate, and test new types of AI so that we understand what each new model is capable of exploring all the risks, from social harms like bias and misinformation, through to the most extreme risks of all. 

The British people should have peace of mind that we’re developing the most advanced protections for AI of any country in the world.

Doing what’s right and what’s necessary to keep you safe.

But AI does not respect borders.

So we cannot do this alone.

The second part of our plan is to host the world’s first ever Global AI Safety Summit next week, at Bletchley Park – the iconic home of computer science.

We’re bringing together the world’s leading representatives from Civil Society to the companies pioneering AI and the countries most advanced in using it.

And yes – we’ve invited China.

I know there are some who will say they should have been excluded.

But there can be no serious strategy for AI without at least trying to engage all of the world’s leading AI powers.

That might not have been the easy thing to do, but it was the right thing to do. 

So, what do we hope to achieve at next week’s Summit?

Right now, we don’t have a shared understanding of the risks that we face.

And without that, we cannot hope to work together to address them.

That’s why we will push hard to agree the first ever international statement about the nature of these risks.

Yet AI is developing at breath taking speed. 

Every new wave will become more advanced, better trained, with better chips, and more computing power.

So we need to make sure that as the risks evolve, so does our shared understanding.

I believe we should take inspiration from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which was set up to reach an international scientific consensus.

So, next week, I will propose that we establish a truly global expert panel nominated by the countries and organisations attending  to publish a State of AI Science report. 

Of course, our efforts also depend on collaboration with the AI companies themselves. 

Uniquely in the world, those companies have already trusted the UK with privileged access to their models. 

That’s why the UK is so well-placed to create the world’s first Safety Institute.

And at next week’s Summit I will work together with the companies and countries to deepen our partnerships.

My vision, and our ultimate goal, should be to work towards a more international approach to safety where we collaborate with partners to ensure AI systems are safe before they are released.

And so to support this, we will make the work of our Safety Institute available to the world.

That’s the right thing to do morally, in keeping with the UK’s historic role on the international stage.

And it’s also the right thing economically, for families and businesses up and down the country.

Because the future of AI is safe AI. 

And by making the UK a global leader in safe AI, we will attract even more of the new jobs and investment that will come from this new wave of technology.

Just think for a moment about what that will mean for our country. 

The growth it will catalyse, the jobs it will create, the change it can deliver –for the better.

And that’s the third part of our plan – to make sure that everyone in our country can benefit from the opportunities of AI.

We’ve already got strong foundations.

Third in the world for tech, behind only the US and China.

The best place in Europe to raise capital. 

All of the leading AI companies - choosing the UK as their European headquarters.

The most pro-investment tax regime. The most pro-entrepreneur visa regime, to attract the world’s top talent and the education reforms to give our own young people the skills to succeed. 

And we’re going to make it even easier for ambitious people with big ideas to start, grow, and compete in the world of AI. 

That’s not just about having the technical skills, but the raw computing power. 

That’s why we’re investing almost a billion pounds in a supercomputer thousands of times faster than the one you have at home. 

And it’s why we’re investing £2.5bn in quantum computers, which can be exponentially quicker than those computers still.  

To understand this, consider how Google’s Sycamore quantum computer can solve a maths problem in 200 seconds, that would take the world’s fastest supercomputer 10,000 years.

And as we invest more in our computing power, we’ll make it available for researchers and businesses, as well as government so that when the best entrepreneurs in the world think about where they want to start and scale their AI businesses, they choose the UK. 

And finally, we must target our scientific efforts towards what I think of as AI for good.

Right across the western world, we’re searching for answers to the question of how we can improve and increase our productivity.

Because that’s the only way over the long-term to grow our economy and raise people’s living standards. 

And in a million different ways, across every aspect of our lives, AI can be that answer.

In the public sector, we’re clamping down on benefit fraudsters and using AI as a co-pilot to help clear backlogs and radically speed up paperwork. 

Just take for example, the task of producing bundles for a benefits tribunal.

Before, a week’s work could produce around 11. 

Now – that takes less than an hour. 

And just imagine the benefits of that rolled out across the whole of government. 

In the private sector, start-ups like Robin AI are revolutionising the legal profession writing contracts in minutes, saving businesses and customers time and money. 

London-based Wayve is using sophisticated AI software to create a new generation of electric, self-driving cars.

But more than all of this – AI can help us solve some of the greatest social challenges of our time.   

It can help us finally achieve the promise of nuclear fusion, providing abundant, cheap, clean energy with virtually no emissions.

It can help us solve world hunger, by making food cheaper and easier to grow and preventing crop failures by accurately predicting when to plant, harvest or water your crops.

And AI could help find novel dementia treatments or develop vaccines for cancer.

That’s why today we’re investing a further £100m to accelerate the use of AI on the most transformational breakthroughs in treatments for previously incurable diseases.

Now I believe nothing in our foreseeable future will be more transformative for our economy, our society, and all our lives, than this technology.

But in this moment, it is also one of the greatest tests of leadership we face.

It would be easy to bury our heads in the sand and hope it’ll turn out alright in the end.

To decide it’s all too difficult, or the risks of political failure are too great.

To put short-term demands ahead of the long-term interest of the country.

But I won’t do that.

I will do the right thing, not the easy thing. 

I will always be honest with you about the risks.

And you can trust me to make the right long-term decisions giving you the peace of mind that we will keep you safe while making sure you and your children have all the opportunities for a better future that AI can bring.

I feel an extraordinary sense of purpose. 

When I think about why I came into politics…

Frankly, why almost anyone came into politics…

It’s because we want to make life better for people to give our children and grandchildren a better future.

And we strive, hour after hour, policy after policy, just trying to make a difference.

And yet, if harnessed in the right way, the power and possibility of this technology could dwarf anything any of us have achieved in a generation. 

And that’s why I make no apology for being pro-technology. 

It’s why I want to seize every opportunity for our country to benefit in the way I’m so convinced that it can. 

And it’s why I believe we can and should, look to the future with optimism and hope.






More posts like this

Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

More from Existential Risk Observatory (@XRobservatory) on Twitter:

It was a landmark speech by @RishiSunak: the first real recognition of existential risk by a world leader. But even better are the press questions at the end:

@itvnews: "If the risks are as big as you say, shouldn't we at the very least slow down AI development, at least long enough to understand and control the risks."

@SkyNews: "Is it fair to say we know enough already to call for a moratorium on artificial general intelligence? Would you back a moratorium on AGI?" 

Sky again: "Given the harms and the risk you pointed out in this report, and some of those are profound, surely there must be some red lines we can draw at this point. Which ones are yours?"

@TheSun: "You say we shouldn't be losing sleep over this stuff. If not, why not?"

@theipaper: "You haven't really talked about whether your government is actually going to regulate. Will there be an AI Bill or similar on the The King's Speech?" 

iNews again: "On the details of that regulation: does the government remain commited to this idea of responsible scaling, whereby you sort of test models after they're being developed, or is it time to start thinking about how you intervene to stop the most dangerous models being developed at all?" 

Who would have thought one year ago? The public debate about AI xrisk so far outdoes everyone's expectations. Next step: convincing answers.


Some moderately strong and reasonable statements coming from a PM. I wonder what their vision for the AI safety institute is and how the expert panel might look like.

Seems a bit misplaced to say that the institute will be the first in the world as there's already several institutes working on this (though he could be meaning within government).

As far as I understand the plan is for it to be a (sort of?) national/governmental institute.[1] The UK government has quite a few scientific institutes. It might be the first in the world of that kind.

  1. ^

    In this article from early October, the phrasing implies that it would be tied to the UK government:

    Sunak will use the second day of Britain's upcoming two-day AI summit to gather “like-minded countries” and executives from the leading AI companies to set out a roadmap for an AI Safety Institute, according to five people familiar with the government’s plans.

    The body would assist governments in evaluating national security risks associated with frontier models, which are the most advanced forms of the technology.

    The idea is that the institute could emerge from what is now the United Kingdom’s government’s Frontier AI Taskforce[...].

Having thought more about it, I think the AI safety institute might be a continuation of the UK Frontier AI Taskforce. I don't know anything about the object-level output of the Taskforce but they've certainly managed to put together a great bunch of people as advisors and contributors (Yoshua Bengio, Paul Christiano, etc.). Very excited to see what comes out of this.

[Summary by Claude 2] Here is a summary of the key points from the speech:

  • Rishi expresses optimism about the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve lives, comparing it to previous technological revolutions.
  • However, Rishi acknowledges there are risks and dangers with AI, including weapons development, cyberattacks, and potential loss of control.
  • To address this, the UK government will establish the world's first AI Safety Institute to evaluate new AI systems. It has already invested £100m in an AI safety taskforce.
  • The UK will host the first Global AI Safety Summit next week, bringing together countries, companies and civil society to agree on the risks.
  • Rishi proposes an international expert panel to continually update understanding of AI risks.
  • The goal is to collaborate internationally on AI safety, while still encouraging innovation in the UK.
  • The UK is investing in computing power, skills and an entrepreneurial environment to become a leader in safe AI and benefit economically.
  • AI will be targeted at solving major challenges like clean energy, food production, health and government efficiency.

Well, this is our moment. 

Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities