The article first evaluates the chances of accidental/unauthorized nuclear detonation. Most interestingly, the article lists 16 of the "more dramatic" incidents with live nuclear weapons. (Some incidents are still redacted.)
The article then discusses how nuclear risk was perceived by Soviets and Allies. And what the likely responses would be in case of an actual unauthorized detonation.
The article concludes by discussing potential solutions to mitigate risks of future nuclear detonations, including changes to a) the handling of nuclear weapons, b) the missile command structure, and c) the selection and supervision of personnel.
This post is co-authored with Ben Garfinkel. It is cross-posted from the CEA blog. A PDF version can be found here.
Summary: Some strategic decisions available to the effective altruism m...
Disclaimer: Although I work on the Groups Team at CEA, I’m writing this in a personal capacity, and this post does not constitute an endorsement by CEA.
Agency - the realisation that you really can just do things.
TL;DR
Biosecurity needs people (of any background) who are agentic and have a high execution velocity and track record....
TL;DR: I'm releasing a website that ranks philanthropists according to EA principles and research, and allows users to re-rank the list using their own assumptions. I'd like feedback and help making it better. I'd especially like ideas for how to make the results more trustworthy. Funding may be available.
I recently built Impact List (impactlist.xyz), a site which ranks people by their positive impact via donations.
The goal is t...