(How to end animal factories at least in the western countries, I do not know how different it would be in poorer countries with not so democratic regimes)

  1. Figure out what possible negative consequences would occur, if the animal factories would be banned altogether... Do some people need the animal products because of necessary medical/health reasons? Would there be then enough of these products from local farms? What to do with the surviving animals inn factories? To figure this out, we could create a team of people that would do a research, find experts and think it through.
  2. Get lawyers to prepare a legal referendum in each country about stopping this. And also prepare how to ensure that local farms are transparently supervised. And set a goal of a number of people persuaded and put a counter on a website, where people would register to pre-agree to the referendum.
  3. Get experts to prepare a course for people to explain all the possibilities of vegan diet. This will be important because without factories the supply of animal products is goin to drastically decrease.
  4. Get sales people and marketers to create an online course that would teach volunteers how to persuade their friends, family, etc… to pre-agree to the referendum… (Talk about documentaries, show some footage if necessary, or host a documentary screening, and then encourage people and show them that there is a solution, that we can take collectively to end this suffering - without arguing with people whether it makes a difference to become vegan or is healthy to eat meat)
  5. Create a campaign, that would be driven not by funds, but by volunteers, who would create content on social media.
  6. As more and more volunteers will join and more and more people persuaded, we will sooner or later hit the number needed for making the referendum happen, in each country.

And that will be the end of this hell.

I think we can restrict ourselves when needed. When Covid hit, we locked ourselves up. This wouldn’t even be as uncomfortable, and would solve a larger crises.

I'm not just a talker, I want to create this movement - write to me and let's start with the first step. Or tell me who can I contact, who could give me more insight or could make this happen.

-11

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hi Josef, I love that you're wanting to strategize on how to end factory farming.

At the time of writing your post has a -11 score. In case you are confused about why, I suspect that it's because, whether this is true or not, your post comes across as not being very well researched or well thought out.

I wonder, have you talked much or worked with many activists or organisations in the farmed animal advocacy space? 

You've presented a very vague plan to solve a problem that many on this forum think is one of the biggest, most difficult problems in the world! 

For example between steps 5 and 6, you seem to just gloss over the challenge of convincing people to give up meat and go vegan, which is immensely difficult!

Additionally, the plan you've proposed is is already being done. Just this year there have been ballot initiatives and votes on banning factory farming. There are dozens of orgs, many led by health professionals, creating content on vegan diets. There are marketers and vegan influencers and all the rest.

When you say you want to start a movement, what exactly do you mean? Your plan covers a large chunk of the existing animal advocacy movement. What would your "sub movement" do differently?

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
Regulation cannot be written in blood alone. There’s this fantasy of easy, free support for the AI Safety position coming from what’s commonly called a “warning shot”. The idea is that AI will cause smaller disasters before it causes a really big one, and that when people see this they will realize we’ve been right all along and easily do what we suggest. I can’t count how many times someone (ostensibly from my own side) has said something to me like “we just have to hope for warning shots”. It’s the AI Safety version of “regulation is written in blood”. But that’s not how it works. Here’s what I think about the myth that warning shots will come to save the day: 1) Awful. I will never hope for a disaster. That’s what I’m trying to prevent. Hoping for disasters to make our job easier is callous and it takes us off track to be thinking about the silver lining of failing in our mission. 2) A disaster does not automatically a warning shot make. People have to be prepared with a world model that includes what the significance of the event would be to experience it as a warning shot that kicks them into gear. 3) The way to make warning shots effective if (God forbid) they happen is to work hard at convincing others of the risk and what to do about it based on the evidence we already have— the very thing we should be doing in the absence of warning shots. If these smaller scale disasters happen, they will only serve as warning shots if we put a lot of work into educating the public to understand what they mean before they happen. The default “warning shot” event outcome is confusion, misattribution, or normalizing the tragedy. Let’s imagine what one of these macabrely hoped-for “warning shot” scenarios feels like from the inside. Say one of the commonly proposed warning shot scenario occurs: a misaligned AI causes several thousand deaths. Say the deaths are of ICU patients because the AI in charge of their machines decides that costs and suffering would be minimize
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
This is a transcript of my opening talk at EA Global: London 2025. In my talk, I challenge the misconception that EA is populated by “cold, uncaring, spreadsheet-obsessed robots” and explain how EA principles serve as tools for putting compassion into practice, translating our feelings about the world's problems into effective action. Key points:  * Most people involved in EA are here because of their feelings, not despite them. Many of us are driven by emotions like anger about neglected global health needs, sadness about animal suffering, or fear about AI risks. What distinguishes us as a community isn't that we don't feel; it's that we don't stop at feeling — we act. Two examples: * When USAID cuts threatened critical health programs, GiveWell mobilized $24 million in emergency funding within weeks. * People from the EA ecosystem spotted AI risks years ahead of the mainstream and pioneered funding for the field starting in 2015, helping transform AI safety from a fringe concern into a thriving research field. * We don't make spreadsheets because we lack care. We make them because we care deeply. In the face of tremendous suffering, prioritization helps us take decisive, thoughtful action instead of freezing or leaving impact on the table. * Surveys show that personal connections are the most common way that people first discover EA. When we share our own stories — explaining not just what we do but why it matters to us emotionally — we help others see that EA offers a concrete way to turn their compassion into meaningful impact. You can also watch my full talk on YouTube. ---------------------------------------- One year ago, I stood on this stage as the new CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism to talk about the journey effective altruism is on. Among other key messages, my talk made this point: if we want to get to where we want to go, we need to be better at telling our own stories rather than leaving that to critics and commentators. Since
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Shape and lead the future of effective altruism in the UK — apply to be the Director of EA UK. The UK has the world's second-largest EA community, with London having the highest concentration of EAs globally. This represents a significant opportunity to strengthen and grow the effective altruism movement where it matters most. The EA UK board is recruiting for a new Director, as our existing Director is moving on to another opportunity. We believe that the strongest version of EA UK is one where the Director is implementing a strategy that they have created themselves, hence the open nature of this opportunity. As Director of EA UK, you'll have access to: * An established organisation with 9 years of London community building experience * An extensive network and documented history of what works (and what doesn't) * 9+ months of secured funding to develop and implement your vision, and additional potential funding and connections to funders * A supportive board and engaged community eager to help you succeed Your task would be to determine how to best leverage these resources to maximize positive impact through community building in the UK. This is a unique opportunity for a self-directed community-builder to shape EA UK's future. You'll be responsible for both setting the strategic direction and executing on that strategy. This is currently a one-person organisation (you), so you'll need to thrive working independently while building connections across the EA ecosystem. There is scope to pitch expansion to funders and the board. We hope to see your application! Alternatively, if you know anyone who might be a good fit for this role, please email madeleine@goodstructures.co.