Hide table of contents

Open Philanthropy’s “Day in the Life” series showcases the wide-ranging work of our staff, spotlighting individual team members as they navigate a typical workday. We hope these posts provide an inside look into what working at Open Phil is really like. If you’re interested in joining our team, we encourage you to check out our open roles.

Anna is Open Philanthropy’s Director of Internal Operations. The teams she manages — Recruiting, Immigration, People Operations, Business Operations, and IT — focus on building talent and helping staff do their best work. Before coming to Open Phil, she was Director of Human Resources at Buffalo Exchange, had spent ten years managing teams of 100 to 150 people, worked on political campaigns, and taught reading enrichment.

Anna with her lovely pup, Merlin! 

Day in the Life

One of the joys of my day-to-day work is the variety of projects and people I get to support. Across the teams I oversee, my goals are to make sure we set strong priorities, balance trade-offs, hire the right people for the right roles, and ensure that teams have the resources they need. I also serve in cross-functional meetings across Grants, Legal, Finance, and our programmatic work to help us sync on the most critical projects. In any given week, this can feel like a heck of a lot of meetings.

Today is relatively typical. I start by clearing out my email and updating my to-do list. After, I ping a couple of people on Slack and close a few open loops before the day really starts.

My first meeting is with our Immigration and Global Workforce manager, Martin McDonald, who brings incredible expertise to the table. I meet with each of my direct reports weekly for a project check-in — we talk about what’s going well, what’s feeling hard, and the work their team is doing. Open Phil’s emphasis on ownership means that decisions and problem-solving happen at all levels, so I often serve as a thought partner in these meetings. In our call, Martin thinks through different visa vehicles for a Global Catastrophic Risks Capacity Building hire, and his plan for communicating with the applicant and hiring manager. We also have a big win to celebrate — a team member’s visa was approved!  

Because I manage a team of managers, I also invest in quarterly “skip-level” meetings with everyone in my reporting line. We think of these meetings as a bit of a “choose your own adventure”, where people are welcome to bring any topic that’s on their mind. Today, I have a few skip-level meetings, one of which is with a relatively senior member of Recruiting. We spend most of our time discussing the path to a more management-focused role.

We’re preparing for our upcoming Togetherness Week, so next up on the agenda is a joint team meeting between Business Operations and People Operations to talk through logistics. Our office space will be accommodating a 5x influx of staff, and members of our globally distributed team will fly in from around the world. As Open Phil grows, each Togetherness Week is our “biggest one yet”. Paying attention to small details helps us continue to run smooth events. In this meeting, the Operations teams are focused on “red teaming” — deliberately stress-testing their plan to anticipate and prepare for what could go wrong. 

In addition to developing managers in my reporting line, I also serve as a management coach for leaders at Open Phil and other impact-oriented organizations. My next meeting is one of these coaching sessions, and the conversation is focused on how to build a better feedback culture — including upward feedback — within their team.

I finish my day with a big stack of reading: a few performance reviews and the first draft of a new vendor proposal. I also add some notes to an org-wide email update from IT, as well as to a hiring recommendation for a promising candidate with a tricky onboarding situation. Tomorrow is “No Meeting Wednesday”, which means my calendar is cleared for focus work. I close out my day by lining everything up for my first writing project in the morning.

My work touches many different areas, which is extraordinarily fun and motivating. Each part of my day — working through high-level operational trade-offs, team meetings centered on meeting a specific goal, 1:1 conversations — gives me the chance to see our team’s ownership, resourcefulness, and genuine drive to contribute to our mission from so many different angles.

If you’re excited about operations, come work with me! We’re hiring a Business Operations Manager to help our teams run smoothly (deadline 07/01/2024). If you’d like to work at Open Phil but don’t see the perfect role, you’re also welcome to apply via our General Application.

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Executive summary: Anna Weldon, Director of Internal Operations at Open Philanthropy, manages multiple teams and projects to support the organization's mission, emphasizing talent development, efficient operations, and cross-functional collaboration.

Key points:

  1. Anna oversees Recruiting, Immigration, People Operations, Business Operations, and IT teams, focusing on talent building and staff support.
  2. Her typical day involves various meetings, including direct report check-ins, skip-level discussions, and cross-functional collaborations.
  3. She acts as a thought partner in decision-making and problem-solving across all levels of the organization.
  4. Anna contributes to event planning, such as the upcoming Togetherness Week, which involves complex logistics for a growing organization.
  5. She provides management coaching both internally and for other impact-oriented organizations.
  6. Open Philanthropy is currently hiring for a Business Operations Manager role (deadline 07/01/2024).

 

 

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while