EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

by ghabs
2 min read 0

63

AI safetyCoworking spacesAnnouncements and updatesFAR AI
Frontpage
This is a linkpost for https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/bTBmRzYkupcDa6q7X/announcing-far-labs-an-ai-safety-coworking-space

FAR Labs is a coworking hub in downtown Berkeley for organizations and individuals working on AI safety and related issues. Since opening the space in March 2023, we have grown to host approximately 30 members. Our members are primarily drawn from four anchor organizations, but we also host a number of independent researchers and research teams.

Now that our initial setup is complete, we are pleased to announce an open call for applications for individuals or organizations who wish to work from this space.

Our initial aims for FAR Labs:

  • First and foremost it should be a place to do great work. Our members are working on challenging problems, and we want to improve their effectiveness, reduce distractions, and provide a professional environment for them to work in. That includes providing a variety of workspaces (private offices, dedicated desks and hot-desks, general areas), catering, and other office amenities such as a gym.
  • A warm, intellectually generative culture. Having interesting and fun conversations is one of the best parts of working in a shared environment, and championing a culture that enables those interactions is incredibly important to us.
  • Supporting collaborations between members, other alignment organizations, and outside collaborators (e.g. academics, or industry researchers). While membership is tied to actively working on AI safety (technical or governance) or related areas (e.g. field building, advocacy, fundraising), we also want to make a space that’s welcoming to many viewpoints, which we expect to benefit both members and visitors.

FAR AI’s broader mission is to support research and initiatives that promote trustworthy and safe AI systems. FAR Labs is an investment in operations and coordination. By creating research environments and good operational scaffolding, we can accelerate safety research and x-risk reduction across projects and orgs.

For the past six months that’s looked like setting up the space and getting the basics in place (office, food, equipment). Moving into 2024 the Labs team will begin offering programs for members – as well as others in the AI safety ecosystem – for developing relevant skills for research and operational excellence. We’re particularly excited about identifying best practices and providing training to help members in building and scaling high performing teams.

FAR Labs runs at cost/a slight loss[1]; we’re aiming for a fully member supported office and community space.

We are opening for new membership applications. Currently we hope to onboard one to three alignment oriented organizations, and perhaps a handful of independent members[2], aiming for a total membership of 40-50 people. If you’re interested in working from FAR Labs, or would like to learn more, please reach out or apply.

  1. ^

    Programs, external visitors, and workshops will be grant funded, while our ongoing day to day office costs are covered by member dues.

  2. ^

    While we host several independent researchers we do prioritize organizations.

63

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
This is a crosspost for The Case for Insect Consciousness by Bob Fischer, which was originally published on Asterisk in January 2025. [Subtitle.] The evidence that insects feel pain is mounting, however we approach the issue. For years, I was on the fence about the possibility of insects feeling pain — sometimes, I defended the hypothesis;[1] more often, I argued against it.[2] Then, in 2021, I started working on the puzzle of how to compare pain intensity across species. If a human and a pig are suffering as much as each one can, are they suffering the same amount? Or is the human’s pain worse? When my colleagues and I looked at several species, investigating both the probability of pain and its relative intensity,[3] we found something unexpected: on both scores, insects aren’t that different from many other animals.  Around the same time, I started working with an entomologist with a background in neuroscience. She helped me appreciate the weaknesses of the arguments against insect pain. (For instance, people make a big deal of stories about praying mantises mating while being eaten; they ignore how often male mantises fight fiercely to avoid being devoured.) The more I studied the science of sentience, the less confident I became about any theory that would let us rule insect sentience out.  I’m a philosopher, and philosophers pride themselves on following arguments wherever they lead. But we all have our limits, and I worry, quite sincerely, that I’ve been too willing to give insects the benefit of the doubt. I’ve been troubled by what we do to farmed animals for my entire adult life, whereas it’s hard to feel much for flies. Still, I find the argument for insect pain persuasive enough to devote a lot of my time to insect welfare research. In brief, the apparent evidence for the capacity of insects to feel pain is uncomfortably strong.[4] We could dismiss it if we had a consensus-commanding theory of sentience that explained why the apparent evidence is ir
 ·  · 40m read
 · 
I am Jason Green-Lowe, the executive director of the Center for AI Policy (CAIP). Our mission is to directly convince Congress to pass strong AI safety legislation. As I explain in some detail in this post, I think our organization has been doing extremely important work, and that we’ve been doing well at it. Unfortunately, we have been unable to get funding from traditional donors to continue our operations. If we don’t get more funding in the next 30 days, we will have to shut down, which will damage our relationships with Congress and make it harder for future advocates to get traction on AI governance. In this post, I explain what we’ve been doing, why I think it’s valuable, and how your donations could help.  This is the first post in what I expect will be a 3-part series. The first post focuses on CAIP’s particular need for funding. The second post will lay out a more general case for why effective altruists and others who worry about AI safety should spend more money on advocacy and less money on research – even if you don’t think my organization in particular deserves any more funding, you might be convinced that it’s a priority to make sure other advocates get more funding. The third post will take a look at some institutional problems that might be part of why our movement has been systematically underfunding advocacy and offer suggestions about how to correct those problems. OUR MISSION AND STRATEGY The Center for AI Policy’s mission is to directly and openly urge the US Congress to pass strong AI safety legislation. By “strong AI safety legislation,” we mean laws that will significantly change AI developers’ incentives and make them less likely to develop or deploy extremely dangerous AI models. The particular dangers we are most worried about are (a) bioweapons, (b) intelligence explosions, and (c) gradual disempowerment. Most AI models do not significantly increase these risks, and so we advocate for narrowly-targeted laws that would focus their att
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Hi everyone! I’m Caitlin, and I’ve just kicked off a 6-month, full-time career-transition grant to dive deep into AI policy and risk. You can learn more about my work here. What I’m Building I’m launching a TikTok and Instagram channel, @AICuriousGirl, to document my journey as I explore AI governance, misalignment, and the more tangible risks like job displacement and misuse. My goal is to strike a tone of skeptical optimism[1], acknowledging the risks of AI while finding ways to mitigate them. How You Can Help My friends and roommates have already given me invaluable feedback and would be thrilled to hear I'm not just relying on them anymore to be reviewers. I’m now seeking: * Technical and policy experts or other communicators who can * Volunteer 10-15 minutes/week to review draft videos (1-2 minutes in length) and share quick thoughts on: * Clarity * Accuracy * Suggestions for tighter storytelling First Drafts Below are links to my first two episodes. Your early feedback will shape both my content style and how I break down complex ideas into 1- to 2-minute TikToks. 1. Episode 1: What is this channel? 2. Episode 2: What jobs will be left? (Please note: I’ll go into misuse and misalignment scenarios in future videos.) Why TikTok? Short-form video platforms are where many non-technical audiences spend their time, and I’m curious whether they can be a vehicle for thoughtful discussion about AI policy.   If you’re interested, please reply below or DM me, and thank you in advance for lending your expertise! — Caitlin   1. ^ This phrase is not good, please help me think of a better one and I will buy you a virtual coffee or sth. 
Recent opportunities in AI safety
109
Please Donate to CAIP (Post 1 of 3 on AI Governance)
Jason Green-Lowe
· · 40m read
13
13
3
[Part-time AI Safety Research Program] MARS 3.0 Applications Open for Participants & Recruiting Mentors
Cambridge AI Safety Hub
· · 2m read
0
0
71
Can TikToks communicate AI policy and risk?
Caitlin Borke
· · 1m read
1
1
View more