EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Global Priorities Institute2
0
0

We expect to accept two fellows this year, though the number is somewhat flexible.

Reply
See in context
by Global Priorities Institute
3 min read 2

56

Career choiceResearch training programsGlobal Priorities Institute
Frontpage

Overview

We are excited to announce the GPI Predoctoral Research Programme, a one-to-two-year position for early-career researchers interested in pursuing academic careers in economics to advance the field of global priorities research.

Predoctoral research fellows will spend one to two years in Oxford, depending on their preference, providing research assistance both to senior GPI researchers and to faculty in Oxford’s Department of Economics. Researchers will have access to open plan desk space in the Department of Economics, and will have the opportunity to attend seminars and to enrol in an Economics MPhil graduate option course, subject to approval. More information about the programme can be found on the GPI website.

Motivation for the programme

GPI aims to work toward a world in which large-scale political and philanthropic resource allocation decisions are routinely made on the basis of rigourous academic research into how to do as much good as possible.

We believe that currently mainstream approaches to policy analysis and programme evaluation give insufficient attention to a variety of key considerations, including

  • the comparison of interventions across very different cause areas;
  • the comparison of potential impacts on the size and number of future generations; and
  • the estimation and incorporation of flow-through effects, including those that may persist into the very distant future.

We therefore hope to build an academic field, termed 'global priorities research', populated by world-class researchers applying tools from economics, philosophy, and other disciplines to the many unanswered questions posed by the project of global prioritisation.

Thanks in large part to the effective altruism movement, there are currently many enthusiastic young people with an undergraduate training in economics and an interest in building the field of global priorities research. On the other hand, there do not yet appear to be many senior researchers in economics who engage directly with foundational questions of global prioritisation. The GPI Predoctoral Research Programme is designed in response to this pair of circumstances. Predoctoral research fellows will receive mentorship concerning the development of the global priorities research community, as well as the research training necessary for admittance to a world-class graduate programme in economics.

Should I apply?

The Predoctoral Research Programme requires an undergraduate or master’s degree in economics or a closely related discipline, completed by spring 2019, and evidence of strong research potential. An intention to pursue an academic career in global priorities research is also required. Candidates of all nationalities who meet these criteria are encouraged to apply.

The ideal candidate will have a strong background in mathematics, analytic philosophy and (especially) economics; prior research experience; and close familiarity with the thinking that has already been produced by the effective altruism community.

Those intending to pursue careers in less foundational areas of economic research, such as mainstream development economics or domestic policy analysis, are not encouraged to apply.

I'm an aspiring economics researcher, but this programme isn't right for me at the moment. How else can I get involved?

Current students and researchers at any level are of course more than welcome to work independently on topics listed on the GPI research agenda. You are also welcome to explore global priorities research questions formulated elsewhere, such as on the 'economics' page of the website effectivethesis.com. If you produce a piece of research you think may be relevant to the question of global prioritisation, please let us know!

Economics students interested in entering global priorities research are also encouraged to take coursework, and gain research experience, in the most relevant subfields of economics. In particular, while valuable insights can come from any source, we currently (tentatively) believe that the most promising subfields of economics are microeconomic theory, political economy, the economics of discounting and optimal timing and the economics of catastrophic risk. More generally, we believe that theoretical tools will typically prove more valuable than empirical tools at this stage. This is because the task of creating a framework within which to evaluate impacts on very long timescales allows relatively little directly relevant data.

For current job openings in global priorities research, check out the 80,000 Hours job board.

If you have any questions about the Predoctoral Research Programme, or about getting involved with GPI or global priorities research in any other capacity, please don’t hesitate to email gpi-office@philosophy.ox.ac.uk.

56

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
[anonymous]7
0
0

How many fellows do you plan to accept?

Reply
Global Priorities Institute2
0
0

We expect to accept two fellows this year, though the number is somewhat flexible.

Reply
More from Global Priorities Institute
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
This work has come out of my Undergraduate dissertation. I haven't shared or discussed these results much before putting this up.  Message me if you'd like the code :) Edit: 16th April. After helpful comments, especially from Geoffrey, I now believe this method only identifies shifts in the happiness scale (not stretches). Have edited to make this clearer. TLDR * Life satisfaction (LS) appears flat over time, despite massive economic growth — the “Easterlin Paradox.” * Some argue that happiness is rising, but we’re reporting it more conservatively — a phenomenon called rescaling. * I test rescaling using long-run German panel data, looking at whether the association between reported happiness and three “get-me-out-of-here” actions (divorce, job resignation, and hospitalisation) changes over time. * If people are getting happier (and rescaling is occuring) the probability of these actions should become less linked to reported LS — but they don’t. * I find little evidence of rescaling. We should probably take self-reported happiness scores at face value. 1. Background: The Happiness Paradox Humans today live longer, richer, and healthier lives in history — yet we seem no seem for it. Self-reported life satisfaction (LS), usually measured on a 0–10 scale, has remained remarkably flatover the last few decades, even in countries like Germany, the UK, China, and India that have experienced huge GDP growth. As Michael Plant has written, the empirical evidence for this is fairly strong. This is the Easterlin Paradox. It is a paradox, because at a point in time, income is strongly linked to happiness, as I've written on the forum before. This should feel uncomfortable for anyone who believes that economic progress should make lives better — including (me) and others in the EA/Progress Studies worlds. Assuming agree on the empirical facts (i.e., self-reported happiness isn't increasing), there are a few potential explanations: * Hedonic adaptation: as life gets
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
Recent opportunities in Career choice
92
E2G help available
Will Kirkpatrick
· · 3m read
3
3
45
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
50
$100 million dollar grant funding opportunity for EA
Jack Kelly
· · 3m read
1
1
View more