EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Comment Permalink
slowwber1
0
0

Adding to my list of research, thank you!

Reply
See in context
by slowwber
2 min read 8

28

Career choiceCommunity
Frontpage

I have a BS in Environmental Engineering but barely escaped college with a 2.95 GPA. To be frank, I probably should not have done engineering or gone to the school I went to but it happened. The only thing I flourished in was being an RA and doing student orientation. After college I did some design engineering work in wastewater but was bored to death and placed on low skill assignments where the opportunity to learn design was non-existent. I shifted over to an engineering/project schedule forensics career that has been interesting up until the past year or so.

I find myself enjoying meeting new people through business development and helping to train people. Outside of this I also enjoy doing deep dives on infrastructure/public works and economics. I have determined that I either need to pivot to a new field in 2023 or re-invent myself in my current path which can lead to a high earning career but maybe less personal fulfillment.

Taking a look at the job posting boards I typically see policy advisement positions, programming roles and jobs requiring a background in finance/business. All of the research positions are for PhD/Masters people and to be honest, I am not getting in anywhere with my undergrad GPA. This limits what I perceive to be as career options.

So far I have been trying to map out different career options:

  1. Stay in current field, chance to become a high earner and donate.
  2. Pursue an economics degree with a focus on capital improvement programs to facilitate climate resiliency upgrades. (Most desirable but least likely to achieve, may need to take classes post-bacc to bump GPA)
  3. Pivot into homebuilding with an emphasis on missing middle development. (Would be a step back in income)
  4. Go back into more engineering with a focus on nuclear energy. I saw a posting for the NRC just recently that seemed vague but I fit the qualifications. (Less people oriented?)
  5. Pivot into sustainable agriculture which would require a post grad degree. (Least desirable)

Are there any others out there who have been in my shoes who might know what the best course of action might be? I plan to reach out to people who may be in the pathways I mentioned to ask what their course to career was like and what stepping stones exist.

28

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments9


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Tom Henry5
2
0

First, it's important to consider what you really want to do. How much time do you have to explore different options and how much risk are you willing to take? It's also important to think about whether you need a stable income.

One resource that may be helpful is the 80,000 Hours career guide. It covers key ideas such as problem selection, contribution, personal fit, and career capital. You can find more information here: https://80000hours.org/key-ideas/ and https://80000hours.org/career-guide/job-satisfaction/.

Another thing to think about is Cal Newport's idea of "Lifestyle-Centric Career Planning." This involves determining the lifestyle you want and then working backwards to see how you can get there. Consider factors like your schedule, job intensity and prestige, social life, and work/leisure balance. And when you're looking at career opportunities, choose ones that align with your desired lifestyle instead of just going for the most prestigious or financially lucrative options. You can read more about this approach here: https://www.calnewport.com/blog/2008/05/21/the-most-important-piece-of-career-advice-you-probably-never-heard/.

(For example: If social interaction is important for you, don't pursue a job that involves working in isolation unless you have to. [This also goes for graduate studies.] If your idea of an ideal week is one with lots of meetings with people, coordinating and managing people and events, etc., then pursue a job with that instead. You might be interested in operations, e.g. https://80000hours.org/articles/operations-management/  )

It's also important to remember that your past academic history and current career situation don't define you. It sounds like you might be telling yourself some negative things, like "I barely escaped college with a 2.95 GPA" or "I probably should not have done engineering." But there are plenty of things you can do. It's usually not helpful to try to prove to yourself (or other people) that you're smart or capable, because it can lead to a focus on external validation rather than on impact and personal growth. This creates unnecessary stress and makes it harder to make good decisions. Sometimes people pursue graduate studies to do that, and it rarely turns out well.

If you are interested in a career direction, talk to people who are already working in that area. Set up brief calls with them and ask them about their day-to-day work. If the work and the people are compelling to you, then consider doing graduate studies if they are a prerequisite for that career direction.

Reply
slowwber1
0
0

This was so much more helpful than I ever imagined. I am going to be going through your helpful links this week to start the next phase of my career mapping. I will update you with how it goes.

P.S. Are you a counselor or psychologist because the advice about not seeking external validation was something I really needed to hear. Thank you.

Reply
pseudobison3
2
0

In addition to the 80,000 Hours career guide already mentioned, it's worth noting that they can schedule a free 1:1 call to help you think through your options, help you work out next practical steps etc.: https://80000hours.org/speak-with-us/

Reply
slowwber1
0
0

Thank you! I Will give them a call this week!

Reply
HStencil3
1
0

If you’re serious about pursuing a master’s in economics, it might make sense for us to chat — I know a bit about those programs (in the U.S. context). Depending on where you went to undergrad, what courses you took, your GRE scores, and whether you can spin a compelling narrative about why you finished with a 2.95 GPA, you may be able to get into decent master’s programs without any post-bacc coursework. I know folks who’ve done so with similar grades. That doesn’t mean, of course, that heading off in that direction would be a good idea, but it may be more of a live option than you think.

Reply
slowwber1
0
0

I can shoot you a direct message with my email, thank you!

Reply
weeatquince2
0
0

This group might have useful advice for your background: https://www.highimpactengineers.org/ could reach out to them ...

Good luck with the career moves

Reply
slowwber1
0
0

Adding to my list of research, thank you!

Reply
[comment deleted]1
0
0
Deleted by John C,
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Although some of the jokes are inevitably tasteless, and Zorrilla is used to set up punchlines, I enjoyed it and it will surely increase concerns and donations for shrimp. I'm not sure what impression the audience will have of EA in general.  Last week The Daily Show interviewed Rutger Bregman about his new book Moral Ambition (which includes a profile of Zorrilla and SWP). 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Americans, we need your help to stop a dangerous AI bill from passing the Senate. What’s going on? * The House Energy & Commerce Committee included a provision in its reconciliation bill that would ban AI regulation by state and local governments for the next 10 years. * Several states have led the way in AI regulation while Congress has dragged its heels. * Stopping state governments from regulating AI might be okay, if we could trust Congress to meaningfully regulate it instead. But we can’t. This provision would destroy state leadership on AI and pass the responsibility to a Congress that has shown little interest in seriously preventing AI danger. * If this provision passes the Senate, we could see a DECADE of inaction on AI. * This provision also violates the Byrd Rule, a Senate rule which is meant to prevent non-budget items from being included in the reconciliation bill.   What can I do? Here are 3 things you can do TODAY, in order of priority: 1. (5 minutes) Call and email both of your Senators. Tell them you oppose AI preemption, and ask them to raise a point of order that preempting state AI regulation violates the Byrd Rule. * Find your Senators here. * Here’s an example of a call:  “Hello, my name is {YOUR NAME} and I’m a resident of {YOUR STATE}. The newest budget reconciliation bill includes a 10-year ban pre-empting state AI legislation without establishing any federal guardrails. This is extremely concerning to me – leading experts warn us that AI could cause mass harm within the next few years, but this provision would prevent states from protecting their citizens from AI crises for the next decade. It also violates the Byrd Rule, since preempting state AI regulation doesn’t impact federal taxes or spending. I’d like the Senator to speak out against this provision and raise a point of order that this provision should not be included under the Byrd Rule.” See here for sample call + email temp
Recent opportunities in Career choice
128
E2G help available
Will Kirkpatrick
· · 3m read
7
7
30
Apply to help run EAGxIndia 2025!
3 authors
· · 1m read
2
2
45
FLF Fellowship on AI for Human Reasoning: $25-50k, 12 weeks
Oliver Sourbut
·
1
1
View more