We discuss the path to popularizing tofu in the United States, the challenges that are in the way, whether it is better for the movement to take an additive approach with veganism or a subtractive approach, and whether this will be able to displace conventional meat. We're joined by George Stiffman who works to promote Chinese tofu in the United States. He recently launched a book called Broken Cuisine aimed at teaching western cooks how to use tofu and other ingredients beyond just Chinese cooking. He’s also active in the EA community where he co-leads the Effective Altruism Los Angeles group. 
 

18

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
Regulation cannot be written in blood alone. There’s this fantasy of easy, free support for the AI Safety position coming from what’s commonly called a “warning shot”. The idea is that AI will cause smaller disasters before it causes a really big one, and that when people see this they will realize we’ve been right all along and easily do what we suggest. I can’t count how many times someone (ostensibly from my own side) has said something to me like “we just have to hope for warning shots”. It’s the AI Safety version of “regulation is written in blood”. But that’s not how it works. Here’s what I think about the myth that warning shots will come to save the day: 1) Awful. I will never hope for a disaster. That’s what I’m trying to prevent. Hoping for disasters to make our job easier is callous and it takes us off track to be thinking about the silver lining of failing in our mission. 2) A disaster does not automatically a warning shot make. People have to be prepared with a world model that includes what the significance of the event would be to experience it as a warning shot that kicks them into gear. 3) The way to make warning shots effective if (God forbid) they happen is to work hard at convincing others of the risk and what to do about it based on the evidence we already have— the very thing we should be doing in the absence of warning shots. If these smaller scale disasters happen, they will only serve as warning shots if we put a lot of work into educating the public to understand what they mean before they happen. The default “warning shot” event outcome is confusion, misattribution, or normalizing the tragedy. Let’s imagine what one of these macabrely hoped-for “warning shot” scenarios feels like from the inside. Say one of the commonly proposed warning shot scenario occurs: a misaligned AI causes several thousand deaths. Say the deaths are of ICU patients because the AI in charge of their machines decides that costs and suffering would be minimize
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
TL;DR Starting an Effective Altruism (EA) group might be one of the highest-impact opportunities available right now. Here’s how you can get involved: * University students: Apply to the Centre for Effective Altruism’s Organiser Support Programme (OSP) by Sunday, June 22. * City or national group organisers: You’re invited, too. See details here! * Interested in mentorship? Apply to mentor organisers by Wednesday, June 18. * Know someone who could be an organiser or mentor? Forward this post or recommend them directly. OSP provides mentorship, workshops, funding support, and practical resources to build thriving EA communities. Why Starting an EA Group Matters EA Groups, especially university groups, are often the very first exposure people have to effective altruism principles such as scale, tractability, and neglectedness. One conversation, one fellowship, one book club - these seemingly small moments can reshape someone’s career trajectory. Changing trajectories matters - even if one person changes course because of an EA group and ends up working in a high-impact role, the return on investment is huge. You don’t need to take our word for it: * 80,000 Hours: "Probably one of the highest-impact volunteer opportunities we know of." * Rethink Priorities: Only 3–7% of students at universities have heard of EA, indicating neglectedness and a high potential to scale. * Open Philanthropy: In a survey of 217 individuals identified as likely to have careers of particularly high altruistic value from a longtermist perspective, most respondents reported first encountering EA ideas during their college years. When asked what had contributed to their positive impact, local groups were cited most frequently on their list of biggest contributors. This indicates that groups play a very large role in changing career trajectories to high-impact roles. About the Organiser Support Programme (OSP) OSP is a remote programme by the Centre for Effective Altruism designed
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Summary The purpose of this post is to summarize the achievements and learnings at Impact Ops in its first two years. Impact Ops provides consultancy and hands-on support to help high-impact organizations upgrade their operations. We’ve grown from three co-founders to a team of 11 specialists and supported 50+ high-impact organizations since our founding in April 2023. We deliver specialist operations services in areas where we have deep experience, including finance, recruitment, and entity setup. We have 50+ active clients who we’ve helped tackle various operational challenges. Besides our client work, we’re pleased to have contributed to the broader nonprofit ecosystem in several ways, including via free resources. We’re also proud to have built a sustainable business model that doesn’t rely on continuous fundraising. We’ll share details about our services, projects, and business model in what follows, including our key takeaways and what’s next for Impact Ops! What is Impact Ops? Impact Ops is an operations support agency that delivers services to nonprofit organizations.  Our mission is to empower high-impact projects to scale and flourish. We execute our mission by delivering specialist operations services in areas where we have deep experience, including finance, recruitment, and entity setup. Our team has extensive experience within nonprofit operations. Collectively, we have: * 50+ years’ experience working at nonprofits (incl. Effective Ventures, CEA, Panorama Global, Anti Entropy, Code For Africa, Epistea, and the Marine Megafauna Foundation) * 50+ further years’ experience working in related roles outside the nonprofit community, including COO, recruitment, and accounting positions. These figures underrepresent our collective relevant experience, as they exclude time spent supporting nonprofit organizations via Impact Ops (10 years collectively) and working for other consultancies (incl. PwC, EY, BDO, and Accenture). If it sounds like we're pr