EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Take the 2025 EA Forum Survey to help inform our strategy and prioritiesTake the survey
Hide table of contents
by Epistea
4 min read 0

25

CommunityCareer choiceFellowships and internshipsRationalityResearch
Frontpage
Show all topics

Crossposted  from LessWrong.

UPDATE 2: Do you have any questions about the Epistea Residency? Join us for a live Q & A call with the organizers on July 20, Thursday 9 am CET / Wesnesday midnight 0 am PDT at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85371078204

UPDATE: We clarified the sections on funding, applying as an individual and have extended the deadline to apply (now July 24).

Motivation

In the past years, the research and development of new methods in rationality and epistemics have slowed down significantly and become increasingly more neglected. However, clear thinking and rationality, we believe, is not less important today than it was before. Even though attention of LessWrong and applied rationality communities has been recently mostly focused on direct intervention into AI risk, in our view, a lot of potential problems with the transition to powerful AI systems are related to the ability of humans to think clearly, and in particular, the ability of humans to think clearly in groups. Based on thinking about the relative importance and neglectedness of rationality, we at Epistea decided to organize a residency program aiming to improve the situation and bring new people to the areas of rationality, epistemics, and civilisational sanity. 

Epistea Residency
The Epistea Residency program will be happening from September 18 to November 25, 2023 as part of Prague Fall Season 2023 at Fixed Point in Prague, Czech Republic. One way to think about the fellowship is as a program somewhat similar to SERI-MATS or PIBBSS, but focused on advancing epistemics and applied rationality, rather than AI alignment directly (this does not preclude projects which advance both rationality and alignment). For the 10-week in-person residency program, we will invite between 20 to 30 participants, forming teams of 3-5 members each. We expect all team members to dedicate at the minimum 0.5 FTE (20 hours per week) to the residency, granting them the possibility to at least partially maintain their regular work commitments if necessary. By the end of their residency, the teams will be expected to deliver a project output or reach a major project milestone. 

Current tentative mentors for the program are: Anna Salamon, Jan Kulveit, Nora Ammann, Eli Tyre, Gavin Leech, Raymond Douglas and Damon Sasi

Format

The teams will have the option to propose their own project within the areas of rationality, epistemics, and civilisational sanity. The following is a list of directions we are excited about:

  • Applied rationality theory. For example: rethinking applied rationality from scratch based on geometric rationality and active inference;
  • Group rationality. For example developing group coordination mechanism avoiding coordination on false "coordination beliefs", advancing previous Epistea work;
  • Applied rationality practice. For example, developing new easy way to transmit habits or techniques, or a new workshop format;  
  • Use of AI to improve human rationality and coordination, e.g. developing an "automated Double-Crux aid" or automated group deliberation aid;
  • Interventions to increase sanity waterline in general public, e.g. developing easily spreadable and useful models for understanding the AI transition, developing metaphors and simple arguments to counter biases influencing the AI risk debate, or developing other scalable interventions into civilizational sanity;
  • Interventions against memetic hijacking, e.g. developments of tools to help people avoid becoming ideological bots;

We are open to different forms of work - with the soft boundary that residency projects should aim to produce concrete outputs (posts, papers, courses, tools, workshops, new techniques). The progress can take different forms, including:

  • Research;
  • Distillation, communication, and publishing (writing and publishing a series of explanatory posts, video production, writing a textbook or course materials, etc.);
  • Program development (events, workshops, etc.);
  • Software development.

What we offer

Following the feedback from participants of the program pilot last year, this time around we will support the Epistea Residency teams with:

  • Venue and operations (fully equipped co-working office space for each team, meeting rooms, office supplies, access to and maintenance of the house facilities, daily lunch catering, drinks, and snacks);
  • Administrative support (assistance with booking flights and/or accommodation and settling in Prague, operations for any projects or events organized within the scope of Prague Fall Season);
  • Targeted mentoring by experts in the field of each team’s project. Current tentative mentors are Anna Salamon, Jan Kulveit, Nora Ammann, Eli Tyre, Gavin Leech, and Raymond Douglas. We expect to announce more soon;
  • Opportunity to independently take advantage of the complete Prague Fall Season programming;
  • Possibly funding for travel expenses, accommodation, and salaries (to be determined depending on funding availability).

    We have a preliminary commitment from CFAR to fund a part of this program (teams would apply with CFAR separately to get funding for their project) and we are awaiting more funding decisions. If funding is a crux for you to participate in the program, please apply anyway, and by the time of the selection process (late July), we should have more information about the scope of the funding.
     

Apply now!

The first round of written applications for the Epistea Residency is now open here. 

We welcome applications from both teams and independent individuals. The program is by default designed for teams but if you don't have anyone to team up with, you can still apply and based on your application we suggest other applicants join you in a team. In exceptional cases you can participate as an individual if this serves your project the best, we will evaluate this on a case-by-case basis.

We are accepting applications on a rolling basis with the final deadline of July 17. UPDATE: extended to July 24! Successful applicants will be interviewed in the second application round. All applicants can expect to hear back from us by the beginning of August. If you would like to join us at Fixed Point during Prague Fall Season in another capacity, please fill out this form or stay tuned for the short-term visitor applications for Prague Fall Season 2023.

Support us

We are currently in the process of securing funding for this program (this includes travel reimbursements, financial aid for housing, staff salaries, a small stipend for residents etc.). If you think this is a good fit for your organization or you know of someone who would be interested in supporting this project, please let us know at info@praguefallseason.com.

25

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from Epistea
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
This is Part 1 of a multi-part series, shared as part of Career Conversations Week. The views expressed here are my own and don't reflect those of my employer. TL;DR: Building an EA-aligned career starting from an LMIC comes with specific challenges that shaped how I think about career planning, especially around constraints: * Everyone has their own "passport"—some structural limitation that affects their career more than their abilities. The key is recognizing these constraints exist for everyone, just in different forms. Reframing these from "unfair barriers" to "data about my specific career path" has helped me a lot. * When pursuing an ideal career path, it's easy to fixate on what should be possible rather than what actually is. But those idealized paths often require circumstances you don't have—whether personal (e.g., visa status, financial safety net) or external (e.g., your dream org hiring, or a stable funding landscape). It might be helpful to view the paths that work within your actual constraints as your only real options, at least for now. * Adversity Quotient matters. When you're working on problems that may take years to show real progress, the ability to stick around when the work is tedious becomes a comparative advantage. Introduction Hi, I'm Rika. I was born and raised in the Philippines and now work on hiring and recruiting at the Centre for Effective Altruism in the UK. This post might be helpful for anyone navigating the gap between ambition and constraint—whether facing visa barriers, repeated setbacks, or a lack of role models from similar backgrounds. Hearing stories from people facing similar constraints helped me feel less alone during difficult times. I hope this does the same for someone else, and that you'll find lessons relevant to your own situation. It's also for those curious about EA career paths from low- and middle-income countries—stories that I feel are rarely shared. I can only speak to my own experience, but I hop
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This morning I was looking into Switzerland's new animal welfare labelling law. I was going through the list of abuses that are now required to be documented on labels, and one of them made me do a double-take: "Frogs: Leg removal without anaesthesia."  This confused me. Why are we talking about anaesthesia? Shouldn't the frogs be dead before having their legs removed? It turns out the answer is no; standard industry practice is to cut their legs off while they are fully conscious. They remain alive and responsive for up to 15 minutes afterward. As far as I can tell, there are zero welfare regulations in any major producing country. The scientific evidence for frog sentience is robust - they have nociceptors, opioid receptors, demonstrate pain avoidance learning, and show cognitive abilities including spatial mapping and rule-based learning.  It's hard to find data on the scale of this issue, but estimates put the order of magnitude at billions of frogs annually. I could not find any organisations working directly on frog welfare interventions.  Here are the organizations I found that come closest: * Animal Welfare Institute has documented the issue and published reports, but their focus appears more on the ecological impact and population decline rather than welfare reforms * PETA has conducted investigations and released footage, but their approach is typically to advocate for complete elimination of the practice rather than welfare improvements * Pro Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife focus on conservation and sustainability rather than welfare standards This issue seems tractable. There is scientific research on humane euthanasia methods for amphibians, but this research is primarily for laboratory settings rather than commercial operations. The EU imports the majority of traded frog legs through just a few countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam, creating clear policy leverage points. A major retailer (Carrefour) just stopped selling frog legs after welfar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
This is a cross post written by Andy Masley, not me. I found it really interesting and wanted to see what EAs/rationalists thought of his arguments.  This post was inspired by similar posts by Tyler Cowen and Fergus McCullough. My argument is that while most drinkers are unlikely to be harmed by alcohol, alcohol is drastically harming so many people that we should denormalize alcohol and avoid funding the alcohol industry, and the best way to do that is to stop drinking. This post is not meant to be an objective cost-benefit analysis of alcohol. I may be missing hard-to-measure benefits of alcohol for individuals and societies. My goal here is to highlight specific blindspots a lot of people have to the negative impacts of alcohol, which personally convinced me to stop drinking, but I do not want to imply that this is a fully objective analysis. It seems very hard to create a true cost-benefit analysis, so we each have to make decisions about alcohol given limited information. I’ve never had problems with alcohol. It’s been a fun part of my life and my friends’ lives. I never expected to stop drinking or to write this post. Before I read more about it, I thought of alcohol like junk food: something fun that does not harm most people, but that a few people are moderately harmed by. I thought of alcoholism, like overeating junk food, as a problem of personal responsibility: it’s the addict’s job (along with their friends, family, and doctors) to fix it, rather than the job of everyday consumers. Now I think of alcohol more like tobacco: many people use it without harming themselves, but so many people are being drastically harmed by it (especially and disproportionately the most vulnerable people in society) that everyone has a responsibility to denormalize it. You are not likely to be harmed by alcohol. The average drinker probably suffers few if any negative effects. My argument is about how our collective decision to drink affects other people. This post is not
Recent opportunities in Career choice
11
GiveWell is hiring a Head of Finance
GiveWell
· · 1m read
0
0
87
80,000 Hours for Global Development
Benh713
· · 4m read
7
7
50
AMA with recruiters at impact-focused orgs
Career Week
Calum, Judith Rensing, Rika Gabriel, Dee Kathuria+ 2 more
· · 1m read
54
54
View more