Hide table of contents

TL;DR:

  • We can make saving lives more cost-effective in low and middle income countries
    • By providing the "EECC package" of 40 life-saving actions that are often overlooked - and has an estimated cost-effectiveness of $17 USD per DALY
    • With advocacy, research and implementation (such as training health workers)
  • Fund us please!
  • And talk to us about how we can do better fundraising, communications and advocacy

Background info about EECC

Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) is the basic, cost-effective care that all critically ill patients in the world should receive. The EECC package consists of 40 fundamental life-saving actions that are often overlooked (such as providing oxygen and fluids) and is designed to be feasible in low resource settings. EECC can reduce preventable deaths at scale, in all ages and many medical conditions. The highest yield is expected in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Modeling suggests that providing EECC globally could save one million lives per year. The EECC Network, established in 2021, is made up of 300 global experts and clinicians advocating for EECC, working across more than 50 countries. EECC is not for profit.

What we advocate for and why we think it’s a good idea in theory

Essential care for critically ill patients

Rather than expensive drugs and high-tech machines, we focus on simple interventions such as oxygen, fluids and vital signs checking (which are really cheap and life-saving and often overlooked).

Why don’t health providers do this already?

Our successes so far

Impact:

  • Reached a global consensus among experts on the life-saving actions that constitute EECC 
  • Promoted the uptake of EECC, which has been adopted by the Tanzanian Ministry of Health as national policy 
  • Established strong links and ongoing collaborations with the WHO, the World Bank and UNICEF
  • The international NGO, MSF (Doctors Without Borders) has adopted EECC as policy
  • We created a global EECC Network of 300 expert clinical champions in 50 countries around the world
  • The EECC Network’s Training Working Group is developing a manual, resources and training curricula for clinicians worldwide

Research and Publications: 

  • The rationale behind EECC
  • Global expert consensus on the 40 life-saving actions that make up EECC and the resources required for delivering this care 
  • There is a large  burden of critical illness in hospitals: 12-18% of all hospitalized patients are critically ill, with a mortality rate of 15-30% 
  • EECC delivery has substantial gaps:

           -In Malawi, 89% of patients who need oxygen do not receive it

            -In Tanzanian hospital wards, 44% of resources required for EECC are missing 

  • Providing EECC to a critically ill patient costs 17 USD per day in Tanzania
  • The cost-effectiveness of EECC is 16 USD/ DALY (i.e. 16 USD per healthy life year gained)
  • The potential (modeled) impact of EECC is 1 million lives saved globally each year 
  • EECC is a priority for health systems globally

We are looking for funding for our 2023 plans

So that we can do:

More implementation:

  • Developing the EECC training course and cascading this to health workers across LMICs
  • Implement global and national EECC plans

More advocacy:

  • Advocating for more hospitals implementing EECC, more countries adopting EECC as a national policy
  • An EECC Champions Training and Advocacy Workshop 2023
  • Improved Communications and Advocacy, needing expertise and interns

More meta advocacy:

  • Expand the EECC Network, get more members and people advocating for EECC
  • Strengthen the Network governance, to include working groups and national hubs

More research:

  • Find more cost effective ways to save critically ill patients in resource constrained settings through clinical trials, implementation research, improved modeling and health economic analyses

Call to action

  • Fund our 2023 plans 
  • Advise us on how to do better fundraising, communications and advocacy - be our expert advisor or intern with us if you have these skills!
  • If you are interested in EECC and/or providing care to critically ill patients - join the EECC Network! :)


Posted by Alexandra Wharton-Smith and Carl Otto Schell. Thanks to Yonatan Cale for helping us write this post!



 

20

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments6


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

"has an estimated cost-effectiveness of $16 USD per DALY"

 

Wow, this sounds really promising! Where does this $16 per DALY averted figure come from?

Hi Matt, 

Thank you, I agree it is promising! 

The figure  "$16 per DALY " comes  from Wellcome Trust funded research. The manuscript is currently under peer-review.  The setting is district hospital level care in Tanzania.

Thanks - I expect potential EA donors will want to take a closer look at that research once it's publicly available, to understand exactly which costs and effects are included in that estimate, as well as the extent to which it has external validity (i.e. how likely it is to apply to other settings).

Also, I guess the cost-effectiveness of funding the EECC Network itself isn't $16 per DALY averted - this would depend on the impact of your work, and would need estimating separately.

Yes, the estimated cost effectiveness of 16 USD/ DALYS is for implementing EECC in Tanzania. A link will be set up as soon as the manuscript is published. 

The EECCnetwork has been established to facilitate advocacy, implementation and research around EECC.  The vision is to reduce/stop deaths that can be prevented by the low-cost, feasible lifesaving care that makes up EECC. The EECCnetwork needs funding to deliver on this, but the cost-effectiveness of such support is, as yet, unknown.

 Anyone with questions is most welcome to reach out us! 

A cost-effectiveness estimate of EECC in  Tanzania has just been published. Using Covid-19 as a tracer condition, EECC has an  incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 14 /DALY when compared to current district level hospital critical care.   https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41669-023-00418-x

Hot from the press:  " Essential emergency and critical care as a health system response to critical illness and the COVID19 pandemic: what does it cost?".   

Published today in the scientific journal  Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Although some of the jokes are inevitably tasteless, and Zorrilla is used to set up punchlines, I enjoyed it and it will surely increase concerns and donations for shrimp. I'm not sure what impression the audience will have of EA in general.  Last week The Daily Show interviewed Rutger Bregman about his new book Moral Ambition (which includes a profile of Zorrilla and SWP). 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Americans, we need your help to stop a dangerous AI bill from passing the Senate. What’s going on? * The House Energy & Commerce Committee included a provision in its reconciliation bill that would ban AI regulation by state and local governments for the next 10 years. * Several states have led the way in AI regulation while Congress has dragged its heels. * Stopping state governments from regulating AI might be okay, if we could trust Congress to meaningfully regulate it instead. But we can’t. This provision would destroy state leadership on AI and pass the responsibility to a Congress that has shown little interest in seriously preventing AI danger. * If this provision passes the Senate, we could see a DECADE of inaction on AI. * This provision also violates the Byrd Rule, a Senate rule which is meant to prevent non-budget items from being included in the reconciliation bill.   What can I do? Here are 3 things you can do TODAY, in order of priority: 1. (5 minutes) Call and email both of your Senators. Tell them you oppose AI preemption, and ask them to raise a point of order that preempting state AI regulation violates the Byrd Rule. * Find your Senators here. * Here’s an example of a call:  “Hello, my name is {YOUR NAME} and I’m a resident of {YOUR STATE}. The newest budget reconciliation bill includes a 10-year ban pre-empting state AI legislation without establishing any federal guardrails. This is extremely concerning to me – leading experts warn us that AI could cause mass harm within the next few years, but this provision would prevent states from protecting their citizens from AI crises for the next decade. It also violates the Byrd Rule, since preempting state AI regulation doesn’t impact federal taxes or spending. I’d like the Senator to speak out against this provision and raise a point of order that this provision should not be included under the Byrd Rule.” See here for sample call + email temp