39

I am writing a musical. This is the opening scene to that musical. Enjoy!

 

Beggar: Hey, do you have a dollar or two? I really need to get something to eat.

Hacker: You know, I do, but I’m not gonna give it to you. Sorry, man.

Beggar: What?

Hacker: I do have some money, but I don’t want to give you any.

Beggar: Man, fuck you.

Hacker: You know, I get how you feel. It’d probably feel better if I told you I didn’t have any, right?

Beggar: That’s what people usually say.

Hacker: Yeah, people lie. It’s a tough world out there. (Beat) Mind if I sit?

Beggar: Sure.

(The Hacker sits down on the bench next to the Beggar)

Hacker: Here’s the deal. All resources are finite. There’s only so many dollars in the world, right? And even fewer in my pocket. Every dollar I give to you, I’m not using for anything else. And there are a ridiculously unfathomable number of possible things I could do with that dollar. So this one choice to do one thing is really a choice to not do an unfathomable number of other things. You following me?

Beggar: You’re saying you’d rather, what, buy yourself a candy bar?

Hacker: I’m not talking about any one thing. I’m talking about all of them. But let’s narrow it down. Say I’m looking to give the dollar away. Do some good, yeah? Well, why not give it to NASA, or to some villager in Uganda who has tuberculosis, or to a guy running for Congress who says he’ll get rid of homelessness if he gets elected? Why not give it to…I don’t know, anteater conservation, or moth welfare, or my mom, or that other homeless guy down the block? I can’t give the one dollar to all of those things at once. It’s just one dollar.

Beggar: So what are you going to do with it?

Hacker: That’s exactly it! I mean, who knows what I’m really going to do with the dollar? It’s all up to the whims of my future self, isn’t it? Is he the kind of guy who decides to give an extra dollar to research into neglected tropical diseases this month? Or is he the kind of guy to forget all this and go buy himself a candy bar? Statistically, I’m the candy bar guy, and who am I to argue with statistics? Do I really think I’m that special?

Beggar: So you might as well give it to me?

Hacker: Well, maybe, but hear me out—am I doing you a favor, giving you a dollar? What’s a homeless guy gonna spend an extra buck on? Drugs, right? So maybe not, then. But here’s the thing—who am I to say it’s a bad idea for you to get yourself some drugs? I don’t know you. I don’t know your life. Some people like drugs. So what? Who gave me the authority to decide if you should treat yourself to a little fentanyl? And I mean, if nobody gave money to drug addicts, you might all start dying from withdrawal, and then that’s on me, isn’t it?

Beggar: Hey, I’m not a drug addict, I swear. I just need something to eat.

Hacker: Maybe you do. And hey, I’m not judging. I’m just thinking out loud. The thing is, it is on me if you go into withdrawal, or go hungry today, but it’s also on me that that guy in Uganda is dying of tuberculosis. It’s all on me. I’m responsible for all of it. And it’s not just money. Every second I spend sitting here talking to you, I’m not spending on literally anything else. I could be working extra hours, making more money, so I could give to all of those things and still have a buck left to give to you. Time is money, money is time, resources are finite. It all comes back to that.

Beggar: So why are you still here?

Hacker. I don’t know, man. I got shit to say, I guess. I’m working through a lot of stuff right now, you know? I got this nine to five job, right, I’m making money, I give some of it away. So, good. That’s better than most people. Maybe I’m a good person, then. Or maybe everyone else is even shittier than me. Nobody does everything they could do. So we’re all going to hell, and why not have a good time in the meantime? Why not sit down and have a conversation with a stranger?

Beggar: You’re lonely.

Hacker: (laughs) Yeah, I sure am. You got that right.

Beggar: I’m lonely too. I got no one. I used to have a family—that’s what I spent my time and money on, for a while.

Hacker: Family! There’s a concept.

Beggar: You got kids?

Hacker: Nah. Who’d wanna have kids with me? I’m a big old nobody.

Beggar: I dunno, you seem like you got stuff going for you. Passion, maybe. You can do a lot with that.

Hacker: Passion. Do I? You think so? 

Beggar: Yeah.

Hacker: Wow. Hey, you know what else I got? Nothing to lose—that’s what they call risk tolerance. Passion and risk tolerance. Sounds like something to start with.

Beggar: What do you do?

Hacker: Ah, I work with computers. Tech guy.

Beggar: You could do something with that. Start a business, maybe.

Hacker: (laughs) Ooh, that’d be something. Me, running a business. Doing business guy things. “Hey, cancel that 9am standup, secretary lady. I’ve got to go snort some cocaine.”

(Beggar laughs)

Hacker: Hey, thank you. Seriously. You know what, here’s ten—no, twenty dollars. Go get yourself some food, or you know, beer or fentanyl or whatever makes you happy. I want you to be happy. I gotta run now, but hey, maybe I’ll see you around.

Beggar: Yeah, for sure. Thank you.

39

0
0
1

Reactions

0
0
1

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Really enjoyed this - thanks for sharing!

Can't wait to hear/see the full musical when you're finished :)

We’ll see how it comes out! I’ve been writing fiction a while but never a play or musical.

I love this, have sent it to an artist friend nice one!

Thank you!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
This is a crosspost for The Case for Insect Consciousness by Bob Fischer, which was originally published on Asterisk in January 2025. [Subtitle.] The evidence that insects feel pain is mounting, however we approach the issue. For years, I was on the fence about the possibility of insects feeling pain — sometimes, I defended the hypothesis;[1] more often, I argued against it.[2] Then, in 2021, I started working on the puzzle of how to compare pain intensity across species. If a human and a pig are suffering as much as each one can, are they suffering the same amount? Or is the human’s pain worse? When my colleagues and I looked at several species, investigating both the probability of pain and its relative intensity,[3] we found something unexpected: on both scores, insects aren’t that different from many other animals.  Around the same time, I started working with an entomologist with a background in neuroscience. She helped me appreciate the weaknesses of the arguments against insect pain. (For instance, people make a big deal of stories about praying mantises mating while being eaten; they ignore how often male mantises fight fiercely to avoid being devoured.) The more I studied the science of sentience, the less confident I became about any theory that would let us rule insect sentience out.  I’m a philosopher, and philosophers pride themselves on following arguments wherever they lead. But we all have our limits, and I worry, quite sincerely, that I’ve been too willing to give insects the benefit of the doubt. I’ve been troubled by what we do to farmed animals for my entire adult life, whereas it’s hard to feel much for flies. Still, I find the argument for insect pain persuasive enough to devote a lot of my time to insect welfare research. In brief, the apparent evidence for the capacity of insects to feel pain is uncomfortably strong.[4] We could dismiss it if we had a consensus-commanding theory of sentience that explained why the apparent evidence is ir
 ·  · 40m read
 · 
I am Jason Green-Lowe, the executive director of the Center for AI Policy (CAIP). Our mission is to directly convince Congress to pass strong AI safety legislation. As I explain in some detail in this post, I think our organization has been doing extremely important work, and that we’ve been doing well at it. Unfortunately, we have been unable to get funding from traditional donors to continue our operations. If we don’t get more funding in the next 30 days, we will have to shut down, which will damage our relationships with Congress and make it harder for future advocates to get traction on AI governance. In this post, I explain what we’ve been doing, why I think it’s valuable, and how your donations could help.  This is the first post in what I expect will be a 3-part series. The first post focuses on CAIP’s particular need for funding. The second post will lay out a more general case for why effective altruists and others who worry about AI safety should spend more money on advocacy and less money on research – even if you don’t think my organization in particular deserves any more funding, you might be convinced that it’s a priority to make sure other advocates get more funding. The third post will take a look at some institutional problems that might be part of why our movement has been systematically underfunding advocacy and offer suggestions about how to correct those problems. OUR MISSION AND STRATEGY The Center for AI Policy’s mission is to directly and openly urge the US Congress to pass strong AI safety legislation. By “strong AI safety legislation,” we mean laws that will significantly change AI developers’ incentives and make them less likely to develop or deploy extremely dangerous AI models. The particular dangers we are most worried about are (a) bioweapons, (b) intelligence explosions, and (c) gradual disempowerment. Most AI models do not significantly increase these risks, and so we advocate for narrowly-targeted laws that would focus their att
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Hi everyone! I’m Caitlin, and I’ve just kicked off a 6-month, full-time career-transition grant to dive deep into AI policy and risk. You can learn more about my work here. What I’m Building I’m launching a TikTok and Instagram channel, @AICuriousGirl, to document my journey as I explore AI governance, misalignment, and the more tangible risks like job displacement and misuse. My goal is to strike a tone of skeptical optimism[1], acknowledging the risks of AI while finding ways to mitigate them. How You Can Help My friends and roommates have already given me invaluable feedback and would be thrilled to hear I'm not just relying on them anymore to be reviewers. I’m now seeking: * Technical and policy experts or other communicators who can * Volunteer 10-15 minutes/week to review draft videos (1-2 minutes in length) and share quick thoughts on: * Clarity * Accuracy * Suggestions for tighter storytelling First Drafts Below are links to my first two episodes. Your early feedback will shape both my content style and how I break down complex ideas into 1- to 2-minute TikToks. 1. Episode 1: What is this channel? 2. Episode 2: What jobs will be left? (Please note: I’ll go into misuse and misalignment scenarios in future videos.) Why TikTok? Short-form video platforms are where many non-technical audiences spend their time, and I’m curious whether they can be a vehicle for thoughtful discussion about AI policy.   If you’re interested, please reply below or DM me, and thank you in advance for lending your expertise! — Caitlin   1. ^ This phrase is not good, please help me think of a better one and I will buy you a virtual coffee or sth.