Ingredient costs for a fully nutritious meal: ~$0.20.

This could retail for ~$0.35.

Therefore it should.

TLDR: I need a cofounder/partner types who thrive on execution, scaling, and operations.

If we can produce a fortified, shelf-stable meal at $0.20 in ingredients (~$1/day retail for full nutrition), why isn’t this the global default for how people get their nutrition?

Those meals EXIST (WFP/UNICEF/RAH etc), but are not available at retail.
Big Food is -not- incetivized to provide this (low margin, would cannibalize high-margin low-nutrition products).

A public benefit corporation could leverage capitalism while addressing a global issue. 

The principle behind this project: build food from nutrition up, not from tradition down.

1. The Problem

Hunger and malnutrition remain among the world’s most stubborn problems.

• ~735 million people are undernourished globally (FAO, 2023).
• Malnutrition contributes to ~45% of child deaths under five (WHO).
• Beyond mortality, chronic undernutrition drives impaired development, reduced productivity, and intergenerational poverty.

Effective Altruism has rightly emphasized highly cost-effective interventions like malaria prevention (AMF) and unconditional cash transfers (GiveDirectly). Food aid has often been deprioritized as expensive or logistically messy. Yet the question remains: could there be a scalable, logistics-driven food solution that makes adequate nutrition universally affordable?

2. The Idea

We are developing NutriMeal (working title): a fortified, plant-based, shelf-stable meal designed to cost ~US$0.30 per serving, targeting ~US$1 per day for full nutrition.

Core principles:

• Nutritionally complete: balanced macros (protein, carbs, fats) + full micronutrient profile.
• Ultra-affordable: cheaper than many existing fortified foods, competitive with local staples.
• Shelf-stable: ≥12 months shelf life, enabling storage, disaster resilience, and efficient distribution.
• Scalable logistics: modular production hubs (think Amazon/FedEx for food aid), adaptable to local sourcing.

Our hypothesis: hunger is less about “not enough food” and more about inefficient distribution and unaffordable nutrition. By treating food as a logistics/engineering challenge, we might unlock solutions that complement existing aid models.

3. Why This Could Be Different

• Affordability at scale: If costs hold, $1/day for complete nutrition could be comparable (or superior) to current cash-transfer–based nutrition outcomes.
• Scalability: Meals are designed for replication in multiple countries, leveraging existing grain/legume supply chains.
• Dual-use resilience: Beyond chronic hunger, shelf-stable nutrition is valuable in crises — floods, conflicts, or even extreme scenarios like nuclear winter (aligning with work by ALLFED).
• Complementary, not competitive: This would not replace cash transfers or supplementation, but add another tool in the EA toolkit for addressing malnutrition.

4. Current Status

• Partnerships: We are moving forward on formal partnership agreements with the University of the Philippines and DOST Region VII, alongside discussions with Rise Against Hunger Philippines and other local actors.
• Website/Docs: Currently basic. See https://sites.google.com/view/health-for-a-dollar-a-day
• Stage: Idea + prototyping. Not a polished intervention yet.

5. Key Challenges

From our perspective, two issues dominate:

1. Making it desirable: Even if nutrition and cost are solved, success depends on consistent demand. Taste, texture, and cultural appeal will make or break adoption.
2. Scaling: Achieving and maintaining <$0.30/meal depends on scaling production and distribution efficiently across multiple geographies without unduly harming local actors. Getting the logistics right is as important as the formulation.

And of course, Big Food is unlikely to just let this happen. 

6. Collaboration (Most Important)

I’m a visionary more than an operator. I have founded and scaled businesses before, but operations has never been my strongest suit. The project now needs cofounder/partner types who thrive on execution, scaling, and operations. This is the most important piece for moving NutriMeal forward.

I can provide initial funding to support the early phase, but I need someone who can turn resources + concept into structured execution.

If you remember only one thing from this post: I am looking for a strong partner to co-lead this — someone who can take a big vision and drive execution at scale.

7. Closing

This is  early work. But I’d rather invite EA feedback now than polish in isolation.

If successful, a $1-a-day, nutritionally complete, shelf-stable meal could make nutrition the universally affordable sustainable default, while also strengthening global resilience to shocks.

I’d be grateful for any critiques, suggestions, or introductions.

References:

• FAO, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (2023)
• WHO, Malnutrition Fact Sheet (2022)
• ALLFED (Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters), research on resilient foods