the fact you mention it suggests it's significant to you

This seems like quite a stretch.

What other disciplines would you want to see?

It seems appropriate for a quick take imo 

Do we know they are being actually deleted, rather than just taken offline?

What further actions would Trump/Rubio need to take to properly execute the waiver?

Emphasising it being Bush’s legacy might help? Ie that it’s a Republican rather than Democrat achievement

That is what I understood Russell to be saying? See:

I realized that if you were even arguing about abortion, then you must value human fetuses(which look a lot like chicken fetuses) 8,650 times more than tortured, murdered chickens.

Lack of transparency around the full distribution of decision timeframes, and other aspects of the process, means it’s difficult to make an informed choice the first time around. And one bad experience can be enough to burn people long term, particularly if theyre making the reasonable assumption that LTFF is representative of the average funder.

I read Vasco as suggesting exactly that - what is your understanding of what he meant, if not that?

I’m confused by the wording of your bet - I thought you had been arguing than more than 90% are by GV, not ‘more than 90% are by a non-GV funder’