R

Rebecca

AI governance @ MATS
1757 karmaJoined Working (0-5 years)San Francisco, CA, USA

Participation
4

  • Attended an EA Global conference
  • Attended an EAGx conference
  • Received career coaching from 80,000 Hours
  • Attended more than three meetings with a local EA group

Posts
1

Sorted by New
6
· · 1m read

Comments
314

Lack of transparency around the full distribution of decision timeframes, and other aspects of the process, means it’s difficult to make an informed choice the first time around. And one bad experience can be enough to burn people long term, particularly if theyre making the reasonable assumption that LTFF is representative of the average funder.

I read Vasco as suggesting exactly that - what is your understanding of what he meant, if not that?

I’m confused by the wording of your bet - I thought you had been arguing than more than 90% are by GV, not ‘more than 90% are by a non-GV funder’

LinkedIn has made automated scraping against their ToS, so anyone attempting this should be aware that their account may get banned

In Catholicism, priests are considered sacred chosen instruments by and for god, to mediate between him and lay people. If a given priest is bad, that throws into question whether god has poor judgement, but god is almighty so he doesn’t make mistakes. (Even more so if the pope is implicated, as his word is the direct word of god). Therefore probably he doesn’t exist.

Only later denominations conceptualise faith as primarily a direct relationship between you and god, in part as a response to this dilemma. But if you’re Roman Catholic, your whole religion is thrown into question by widespread priest criminality, and it seems reasonable to have a more modern response than Martin Luther starting a whole new religion, and just conclude that god actually doesn’t exist.

A list like that could be added to the EA Handbook, which is linked on the forum sidebar

Where does 4a come from? I read the WSJ piece but don’t remember that

Yeah the point about needing to learn the relevant skills/norms makes sense to me. I just feel nervous about assuming that because a kid doesn't seem to be negatively affected by their parents being suspicious of them, that they aren't - knowing how much of a negative effect from another person on your wellbeing and sense of self you ought to tolerate is also a thing to be learned.

I’m curious if you remember how you felt about these things as a child, or where you get this model of kids’ psychology from? as this was basically the opposite of my experience as a kid.

I would have thought ‘my tummy hurts’ would be fairly easy to articulate, but possibly I’m overrating the relevant abilities

Load more