I probably should have clarified that EA as a community building effort isn't drawing the same talent. That said, talent that was attracted through community building efforts earlier has had more time to "level up" (as you mentioned) and orgs have likely improved their ability to recruit experienced professionals directly compared to the past (though my intuition is that some orgs haven't fully appreciated the costs of weakening value-alignment since these impacts take a long time to emerge).
A further caveat: I don't know exactly how things are at elite universities these days.
For fairness, I'll just add a comment that the following edits were made after the competition deadline:
• "The first two are based on this post"
• "If doing what worked in other cities worked, it would have already worked"
• "—but it synergises nonetheless"
I made some additional edits after it was announced this essay came in second for this question.
One thing that's unclear to me is whether attempts to use AI systems to augment human capabilities in these domains is in-scope or whether the round is focused on direct enhancement of these capabilities.
I'm also curious about your opinion on whether biological-enhancement based approaches are likely to bear fruit in time to matter. Do you think it's plausible that timelines might be long on our current path or are you more hoping that there's a pause that provides humanity with more time?
(Alternatively, is it more that you think that we need enhanced capabilities to succeed at alignment even if current timeline projections makes this appear challenging?).