DR

david_reinstein

Founder and Co-Director @ The Unjournal
4009 karmaJoined Working (15+ years)Monson, MA, USA

Bio

See davidreinstein.org

I'm the Founder and Co-director of The Unjournal; We organize and fund public journal-independent feedback, rating, and evaluation of hosted papers and dynamically-presented research projects. We will focus on work that is highly relevant to global priorities (especially in economics, social science, and impact evaluation). We will encourage better research by making it easier for researchers to get feedback and credible ratings on their work.


Previously I was a Senior Economist at Rethink Priorities, and before that n Economics lecturer/professor for 15 years.

I'm  working to impact EA fundraising and marketing; see https://bit.ly/eamtt

And projects bridging EA, academia, and open science.. see bit.ly/eaprojects

My previous and ongoing research focuses on determinants and motivators of charitable giving (propensity, amounts, and 'to which cause?'), and drivers of/barriers to effective giving, as well as the impact of pro-social behavior and social preferences on market contexts.

Podcasts: "Found in the Struce" https://anchor.fm/david-reinstein

and the EA Forum podcast: https://anchor.fm/ea-forum-podcast (co-founder, regular reader)

Twitter: @givingtools

Posts
62

Sorted by New

Sequences
1

Unjournal: Pivotal Questions/Claims project + ~EA-funded research evaluation

Comments
851

Topic contributions
9

Project Idea: 'Cost to save a life' interactive calculator promotion


What about making and promoting a ‘how much does it cost to save a life’ quiz and calculator.

 This could be adjustable/customizable (in my country, around the world, of an infant/child/adult, counting ‘value added life years’ etc.) … and trying to make it go viral (or at least bacterial) as in the ‘how rich am I’ calculator? 


The case 

  1. People might really be interested in this… it’s super-compelling (a bit click-baity, maybe, but the payoff is not click bait)!
  2. May make some news headlines too (it’s an “easy story” for media people, asks a question people can engage with, etc. … ’how much does it cost to save a life? find out after the break!)
  3. if people do think it’s much cheaper than it is, as some studies suggest, it would probably be good to change this conception… to help us build a reality-based impact-based evidence-based community and society of donors
  4. similarly, it could get people thinking about ‘how to really measure impact’ --> consider EA-aligned evaluations more seriously

While GiveWell has a page with a lot of tech details, but it’s not compelling or interactive  in the way I suggest above, and I doubt  they market it heavily.

GWWC probably doesn't have the design/engineering time for this (not to mention refining this for accuracy and communication).  But if someone else (UX design, research support, IT) could do the legwork I think they might be very happy to host it. 

It could also mesh well with academic-linked research so I may have  some ‘Meta academic support ads’ funds that could work with this.
 

Tags/backlinks (~testing out this new feature) 
@GiveWell  @Giving What We Can
Projects I'd like to see 

EA Projects I'd Like to See 
 Idea: Curated database of quick-win tangible, attributable projects 

Although direct evidence comparing the subjective distress caused by fishing and natural deaths is limited, the specific characteristics of purse seining suggest that this particular method of fishing may lead to less overall suffering.

This seems like the crux issue to me from an animal welfare PoV, which seems like the highest-order concern. Perhaps you could expand on this? Some relevant links would help here. How much time is spent for each type of death? What are the basis for the estimated suffering levels, etc.

david_reinstein
2
0
0
60% agree

Someone should commission new moral weights work in the next year

Most of the reasons stated below by others. In general, multiple independent investigations boosts credibility. Not sure whether it needs to be in the next year given resource constraints, but sooner is better. 

 ★ By 2025/2030/2035 will there be a "best AI safety practices playbook" which all leading labs in the US claim to follow?
 

unjournal.org Just released our evaluation package for Schuett et al's "Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance". 

Please see here.

Why not what seems to be the obvious mechanism: the cuts to USAID making this more urgent and imperative. Or am I missing something?

We (Unjournal.org) ultimately decided to de-prioritize this after a second opinion and our internal vote. We might reconsider it if others point out flaws in the reasoning above.

I've shared the reasoning/discussion in the relevant row of our Public Database of research with potential for impact. (Column: "Discussion: Why is this impactful/relevant"). I hope to share more of these discussions in that public database, especially if people indicate interest.

 

Unjournal.org is piloting an expansion into evaluating legal research. Please contact me if you are interested.

I would lean the other way, at least in some comms. You wouldn’t want people to think that (e.g.) “the career guidance space in high impact global health and wellbeing is being handled by 80k”. Changing branding could more clearly open opportunities for other orga to enter spaces like that.

Policy-focused grad student groups

I think there could be value in running EA groups for niche populations of students who might go on to have high-leverage roles. Policy students strike me as one of the clearer targets for this.
...
Career panels or similar: Career-focused events targeting specific groups, such as late-stage PhD students in economics or public health, could be impactful during critical decision-making periods.


The Unjournal would be interested in helping facilitate and sponsor reading/discussion/evaluation groups for PhD students, especially in economics and policy. This could be compatible with and linked to such grad student groups and career events. 

If you are an academic or PhD student interested in piloting and organizing this, please contact me/us.  You can also peruse our notes on this potential initiative here and add comments.
 

Possibly naive question: are the projects open source, shared code, and forkable?

Load more