EdoArad
Bio
Participation1
Hey! I'm Edo, married + 2 cats, I live in Tel-Aviv, Israel, and I feel weird writing about myself so I go meta.
I'm a mathematician, I love solving problems and helping people. My LinkedIn profile has some more stuff.
I'm a forum moderator, which mostly means that I care about this forum and about you! So let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
I'm currently working full-time at EA Israel, doing independent research and project management. Currently mostly working on evaluating the impact of for-profit tech companies, but I have many projects and this changes rapidly.
Posts 52
Comments854
Topic contributions32
Hey Maria! In case you aren't aware of them and their work, you might be interested in reaching out / following @Gidi Kadosh (VIVID), @spencerg (Spencer Greenberg of Clearer Thinking), @Inga (Inga Grossman of Rethink Wellbeing), and probably others I'm blanking out on 😊
Also, I'm curious about what you mean by "Foundations of Protection"?
For reference, @Kirsten also took a look into it several years ago - https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Kc4xQAu8R2qQnpzn8/khorton-s-shortform?commentId=epQcsE7PMNc4SENuT
Prices. Target frames its failure to meet its pledge in equity terms, stating [...]
From Chicken Watch, we find Target's 2016's commitment. There, it's stated that
We Will:
- Transition to only cage-free shell eggs by 2025, pending available supply.
While in their 2025 report linked above (this), and in their website , it's framed as a goal rather than a commitment:
Eggs: In 2016, Target set a goal to transition to a 100% cage-free egg supply chain by 2025 pending available supply.
I'm curious about the legality of this. Did they initially frame it as a commitment? Assuming their argument about unavailable (cheap) supply doesn't hold, are they legally bound to uphold their commitment?
One awesome tool by Welfare Footprint Institute from last year is a Chat-GPT agent made for quantifying animal suffering using their framework