My name is Gergő, and my academic background is in psychology. I’m the director at the European Network for AI Safety and founder of Amplify, a marketing agency dedicated to helping fieldbuilding projects. My journey into communitybuilding started in 2019 with organising EA meetups on a volunteer basis.
I started doing full-time paid work in CB in 2021, when I founded an EA club at my university (it wasn’t supposed to be full-time at least at the beginning, but you know how it is). This grew into a city group and eventually into a national group called EA Hungary. We also spun out an AIS group in 2022, which I’m still leading. AIS Hungary is one of the few AIS groups that have 2+ FTE working for them.
Previously I was a volunteer charity analyst and analysis coordinator for SoGive, an experience I think of fondly and I’m grateful for. I have also done some academic research in psychology.
Leave anonymous feedback on me here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf42mPUB_jf7fYK_3PkyFN3QHbo8AF-upGUjkji-1r8AdEZIA/viewform
Anonymous feedback to EA Hungary here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeiRUPX8aOz3nWNOIG4KA6-bYCSZ0BRRx69vwmqEn5ctsQ-vw/viewform
Thanks for providing such a quick update, Joris!
we are not currently setting up the systems to provide part-time organizer financial support, but we are exploring whether to offer financial support for part-time organizers in the future
Would you recommend that uni group organisers in need of a part-time salary apply for funding from elsewhere in the meantime, such as EAIF?
Thanks for sharing this, I have been really enjoying reading the comms coming from EAIF/LTFF lately! Here are some observations/feedback on the post:
Below is a fictionalized list of grants the Long-term Future Fund (LTFF) narrowly rejected or accepted in the last 6 months. We aim to broadly convey which grants we barely rejected, while anonymizing any individual one.
[...]
As the grants we’ve fictionalized are grants LTFF narrowly accepted or rejected
After reading the post, I feel like I really miss knowing which of these did or did not pass your bar. I understand that these are fictional examples that are all very close to the bar, but I think others might feel the same way. If you think it might be worth spelling out why you don't think it makes sense to give explicit verdicts.
The above fictionalized examples illustrate grants that are at or just below our current funding threshold
Or perhaps this means all of them were rejected? (It might just be my English, but it's not clear to me if something is at your funding bar, then you would accept or reject it)
Is https://www.impactcolabs.com/ still active? They don't have the feature with the reputation system, but at least it's a start
Thanks for the post, Jamie!
Given the call for the Ask me Anything, I was wondering if you would be able to share additional context on the following from your application form:
I'm specifically interested in asking about:
Is there a risk that EAIF will have to pause grantmaking after August if the issue is not solved, or do you expect this not to be a problem by then?