EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Agnes Stenlund19
0
0
4

Drew this one for @Toby Tremlett🔹, who took some liberties with "animal":

Reply
See in context
by Toby Tremlett🔹
5 min read 13

48

Effective givingOpportunities to take actionDonation ElectionEffective Altruism ForumGiving Season (2024)
Frontpage
Show all topics

[Donations have now closed- thanks to all who donated!]

The Donation Election Fund is now open! Donate now to make the donation election a bigger deal, promote effective giving conversations, or simply to get your hands on our rewards. 

The CEA Online Team will match[1] the first $5,000 in donations.

Money in the Donation Election Fund will be disbursed to the three winners[2] of the Donation Election (proportionate to their vote).  EA Forum users will vote to determine the final winners. We don't yet know the full list of candidates, but we currently have at least 18, and expect more. 

If there is a charity or project of a charity you'd particularly like to take part (which either is or is fiscally sponsored by a registered charity in the UK or a 501(c)3 in the US), tell them to contact me[3].

Rewards for donors

Sadly, Lizka is no longer on the team, so we can't offer beautiful portraits like these (1,2). However, bad animals, and several other rewards, are still on the menu!

Rewards are detailed below:

Rewards for individuals giving above a certain amount.

Note that you can opt-out of all rewards. Don't feel discouraged if you want to donate but hate bad animals. 

If you donate...You get... 
>$10

An "I donated" flair until the end of Giving Season. 

In other words, one of these guys next to your name on the Forum:

 

>$50

A bad animal drawing, featuring an animal (and optionally a prop) of your choice. We'll comment or quick take these onto the Forum, with you tagged (I'll message you for an OK on tagging before posting). 

For example, this octopus with glasses:

>$750

A lino-print by me (@Toby Tremlett🔹) of your pet, favourite statue, or really anything apart from a human face. Optionally posted to your door. Examples. 

NB- these might take a long time to reach you if I get a lot of requests. I'll be in touch about that. 

After donating, you'll get a thank you email with instructions for claiming your reward. (This post may go up before the email is set up- in that case, message me with a screenshot of your receipt and I'll get you your reward). 

Rewards for everyone, if the fund raises above a certain amount. 

If the fund gets...Forum users get...
>$15,000

Another "Ways the world is getting better" banner in January. 

>$25,000

Celebratory Bulbys burst out of all buttons pressed on the Forum. 

Finally, the poor lad can experience something pleasurable. 
 

Bulby's Forum debut, during April Fools
>$35,000To take part in a Comment Amnesty Day early next year- a day to reply to comments on your posts, or in threads, no matter how old they are. 
>$45,000To propose and vote[4] on the next debate week. 

FAQ

Why should I donate to the Donation Election Fund?

Contributing to the Donation Election Fund could be a good way to improve how Giving Season goes this year, while also directing more funding to promising projects that could productively use it. 

  • You might believe that the Donation Election will choose more cost-effective projects than you would, or subvert biases which you wouldn't endorse on reflection. Although you can also donate to a fund if this is your main objective.
  • Donating could improve the EA community’s understanding of key questions related to effective giving and boost the extent to which effective giving is a core part of effective altruism.
    • A larger Donation Election Fund would encourage more and better participation in these events — increasing the events’ impact. People would feel more motivated to follow the discussions, share their uncertainties or disagreements, explain in greater detail what their projects do and how they would use extra money, etc.
    • This is important because many people discovered the EA community in the past couple of years, and probably missed a lot of discussions on donation choice, considerations around earning to give, and other topics in effective giving. And even people who've been around the movement for much longer might have gone a while without examining their thoughts on these topics. The Donation Election this year will be much more discursive (with live votes on the banner after the first few days, and a discussion thread for people to explain their votes). We hope this will lead to (re)litigation of important donation considerations, and improve our collective knowledge.
    • Donating will also likely make the donors themselves feel more invested in Giving Season and the Donation Election, and contribute more to the event, making it a particularly vibrant time on the Forum.
  • You might want to donate to multiple different kinds of projects in order to make changing your mind about cause prioritization easier, or maybe to hedge your donations. Donating to the Donation Election Fund could help you make impactful donations that you wouldn't have otherwise considered making. 

Why should I not donate to the Donation Election Fund?

You probably shouldn't donate to the Donation Election Fund if you have good reason to think your money will do more good given to a specific donation opportunity. For example, if you have privileged knowledge about a particular opportunity. 

Also, if the charities you would most want to vote for aren't 501(c)3's in the US or registered charities in the UK, they won't be included in the Donation Election. 

I'm a UK Donor, will I be able to giftaid my donation?

Unfortunately not. This was a trade-off we decided to take in order to allow a broader range of charities to take part in the Donation Election. Since we are hosting the fund on every.org, there won't be an option for giftaid. 

How will voting in the Donation Election work?

We will post about this at the start of the election, or before. We are planning on using the same method as last year, but perhaps slightly simplified. 

Do I need to donate to vote?

No, and donating will not affect your voting power. To qualify to vote, you must have had an account on the Forum before the Giving Season announcement was posted (October 22nd). If you have multiple accounts, you can only vote once. 

Let me know in the comments or dm me if you have more questions. If they are frequently asked, I'll edit my answers into the text and link them for you. 

 

  1. ^

    You should probably view the match as a signal that we’re taking the Donation Election Fund seriously, and possibly as an opportunity to move funds designated for CEA towards projects chosen by Forum users. Whether or not this match is “counterfactual” is complicated- the match amount will likely be hit pretty quickly, so you are unlikely to genuinely add $40 to the pot by donating $20, if you donate while the match is still in effect. The match also may lag behind your donation, so don't worry if you only see the total amount go up by the amount you donate. 

  2. ^

    CEA and EV reserve the right to remove candidates for any reason at any time until the disbursal of funds. The most likely reason for this would be if the candidates did not in fact qualify for the election (if they weren't a 501(c)3 or UK registered charity, or weren't fiscally sponsored by one). 

  3. ^

    at toby [dot] content [at] centreforeffectivealtruism [dot] org, or via the Forum. 

  4. ^

    I'll make a thread for people to propose debate week topics, and all answers which have more than X (where X is probably 15) agree reacts by the end of the week, will be made into a poll. 

    5. Show all footnotes

48

0
0
1
1

Reactions

0
0
1
1
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments13


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Agnes Stenlund19
0
0
4

Drew this one for @Toby Tremlett🔹, who took some liberties with "animal":

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹16
1
0

The first bad animal drawing, an Aardvark trying to Park (its bike). For anonymous. Thanks for donating!
 

An aardvark trying to park (its bike)
Reply
NickLaing15
1
0
3

"Why should I donate to the Donation election fund"

Me: Because its a vibe and I'm looking forward to my shrimp sleeping under a mosquito net

Sue me ;)

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹10
5
0
4

I'm concerned that it will be hard to draw this one without implying that the mosquito nets are being used for fishing... stay tuned. 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹11
0
0
1

Thanks for donating @NickLaing! 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹8
0
0
1

Poor @David Solar - your dog isn't this creepy in real life:
 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹8
0
0

A polite pangolin for @Jordan Pieters 🔸 - Thanks for donating!
 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹7
0
0
1

For @LotteG : "frog with tarot cards"
 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹6
0
0

A cat I saw recently, for @Joseph_Chu. Thanks for donating! 
 

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹6
0
0

@Jesper 🔸 wasn't specific on the type of otter they wanted, so I went rogue and chose sea otter. Thanks for donating!

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹6
0
0

@Esben Kran - here is your Puffin!

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹4
0
0

For @Emma Richter🔸 : Thanks for donating!
 

Reply
More from Toby Tremlett🔹
49
State of the EA Newsletter
Toby Tremlett🔹
· · 7m read
9
9
33
All Forum events (I’ve been involved in) retrospective
Toby Tremlett🔹
· · 10m read
6
6
84
DIY debate week (April 28 - May 4th)
Toby Tremlett🔹, Will Howard🔹
· · 3m read
6
6
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
Regulation cannot be written in blood alone. There’s this fantasy of easy, free support for the AI Safety position coming from what’s commonly called a “warning shot”. The idea is that AI will cause smaller disasters before it causes a really big one, and that when people see this they will realize we’ve been right all along and easily do what we suggest. I can’t count how many times someone (ostensibly from my own side) has said something to me like “we just have to hope for warning shots”. It’s the AI Safety version of “regulation is written in blood”. But that’s not how it works. Here’s what I think about the myth that warning shots will come to save the day: 1) Awful. I will never hope for a disaster. That’s what I’m trying to prevent. Hoping for disasters to make our job easier is callous and it takes us off track to be thinking about the silver lining of failing in our mission. 2) A disaster does not automatically a warning shot make. People have to be prepared with a world model that includes what the significance of the event would be to experience it as a warning shot that kicks them into gear. 3) The way to make warning shots effective if (God forbid) they happen is to work hard at convincing others of the risk and what to do about it based on the evidence we already have— the very thing we should be doing in the absence of warning shots. If these smaller scale disasters happen, they will only serve as warning shots if we put a lot of work into educating the public to understand what they mean before they happen. The default “warning shot” event outcome is confusion, misattribution, or normalizing the tragedy. Let’s imagine what one of these macabrely hoped-for “warning shot” scenarios feels like from the inside. Say one of the commonly proposed warning shot scenario occurs: a misaligned AI causes several thousand deaths. Say the deaths are of ICU patients because the AI in charge of their machines decides that costs and suffering would be minimize
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
This is a transcript of my opening talk at EA Global: London 2025. In my talk, I challenge the misconception that EA is populated by “cold, uncaring, spreadsheet-obsessed robots” and explain how EA principles serve as tools for putting compassion into practice, translating our feelings about the world's problems into effective action. Key points:  * Most people involved in EA are here because of their feelings, not despite them. Many of us are driven by emotions like anger about neglected global health needs, sadness about animal suffering, or fear about AI risks. What distinguishes us as a community isn't that we don't feel; it's that we don't stop at feeling — we act. Two examples: * When USAID cuts threatened critical health programs, GiveWell mobilized $24 million in emergency funding within weeks. * People from the EA ecosystem spotted AI risks years ahead of the mainstream and pioneered funding for the field starting in 2015, helping transform AI safety from a fringe concern into a thriving research field. * We don't make spreadsheets because we lack care. We make them because we care deeply. In the face of tremendous suffering, prioritization helps us take decisive, thoughtful action instead of freezing or leaving impact on the table. * Surveys show that personal connections are the most common way that people first discover EA. When we share our own stories — explaining not just what we do but why it matters to us emotionally — we help others see that EA offers a concrete way to turn their compassion into meaningful impact. You can also watch my full talk on YouTube. ---------------------------------------- One year ago, I stood on this stage as the new CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism to talk about the journey effective altruism is on. Among other key messages, my talk made this point: if we want to get to where we want to go, we need to be better at telling our own stories rather than leaving that to critics and commentators. Since
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
A friend of mine who worked as a social worker in a hospital told me a story that stuck with me. She had a conversation with an in-patient having a very difficult time. It was helpful, but as she was leaving, they told her wistfully 'You get to go home'. She found it hard to hear—it felt like an admonition. It was hard not to feel guilt over indeed getting to leave the facility and try to stop thinking about it, when others didn't have that luxury. The story really stuck with me. I resonate with the guilt of being in the fortunate position of being able to go back to my comfortable home and chill with my family while so many beings can't escape the horrible situations they're in, or whose very chance at existence depends on our work. Hearing the story was helpful for dealing with that guilt. Thinking about my friend's situation it was clear why she felt guilty. But also clear that it was absolutely crucial that she did go home. She was only going to be able to keep showing up to work and having useful conversations with people if she allowed herself proper respite. It might be unfair for her patients that she got to take the break they didn't, but it was also very clearly in their best interests for her to do it. Having a clear-cut example like that to think about when feeling guilt over taking time off is useful. But I also find the framing useful beyond the obvious cases. When morality feels all-consuming Effective altruism can sometimes feel all consuming. Any spending decision you make affects how much you can donate. Any activity you choose to do takes time away from work you could be doing to help others. Morality can feel as if it's making claims on even the things which are most important to you, and most personal. Often the narratives with which we push back on such feelings also involve optimisation. We think through how many hours per week we can work without burning out, and how much stress we can handle before it becomes a problem. I do find that
Recent opportunities in Effective giving
8
GiveWell is hiring up to two Strategic Communications Managers
GiveWell
· · 1m read
0
0
18
GiveWell is hiring a Livelihoods Program Officer
GiveWell
· · 1m read
0
0
36
RFP for Charity Evaluations and Recommendations Feasibility Study
Animal Charity Evaluators
· · 1m read
1
1
View more