Will you push (or help) students to apply to "Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Yale, Amherst, Dartmouth, and Bowdoin" and other top universities that offer enough financial assistance? Getting them into one of those seems far cheaper than paying for their tuition at an expensive university without enough financial assistance.
Are there enough excellent universities or programs with enough financial assistance globally that you should just focus on helping students get into those instead of funding them to attend the top universities without enough financial assistance?
(EDIT: To be clear, by "enough financial assistance", I mean that the cost for the student after any needs-based aid, scholarships and help from their parents will be low enough to not be a significant deterrent to attending.)
How was the list of universities determined?
We produced our own ranking of US universities based on factors like school selectivity, academic quality of the student body, and revealed preference data (such as cross-admit yields), plus some other "soft" factors. We sanity-checked this against existing school rankings and anecdotal impressions of people who have a lot of context on the US admissions process. We primarily used national rankings to determine the UK universities in our list, along with some anecdotal evidence about Imperial being the next-best choice (after Oxbridge) for a lot of STEM students.