[…] effective altruism community is continuing to grow rapidly, and is expected to continue growing as promotion for Will MacAskill’s book on effective altruism starts over the next year. This provides a ready made community for our […]
[…] effective altruism community is continuing to grow rapidly, and is expected to continue growing as promotion for Will MacAskill’s book on effective altruism starts over the next year. This provides a ready made community for our […]
[…] Books (Penguin US) and Guardian-Faber was another major success of 2013. As part of CEA’s effective altruism outreach project, it may become a major source of new […]
[…] Save and Animal Charities Evaluators. It is currently incubating the Global Priorities Project, and a project to do effective altruism outreach. It seems likely to continue fostering high-impact projects in the […]
What are the metrics of success? Book purchases? Email signups? Meet-up attendance? ...
It's unfortunate that the UK media launch will coincide with the general election. The competition for mainstream media coverage from other causes will be heavy, especially since the new Transparency legislation has restricted the other activities that charities can do.
The UK general election will be 7th May 2015, whereas the main media launch will be August 2015. So won't we be ok? (But great consideration, that I hadn't even thought about).
Be careful about duplicating content between effectivealtruism.com and effectivealtruism.org; I think maybe Google frowns when it sees the same content duplicated on different domains/webpages.
This is useful thanks. We plan on using the same back-end to host both sites. Do you therefore suggest that we have a clear boundary in the site between the .com and .org sites, rather than simply letting people use the same URL suffix that they entered throughout the site?
Maybe have one of the domains always redirect to the equivalent url on the other domain?
I'm not an expert... you're probably best off googling yourself & doing your own research.
Fantastic. Providing resources to potential EA organisers should be considered, and I agree there are not enough expert advisors in the movement. I've personally found it more difficult to bring established social entrepreneurs on board with the message than younger members, and I suspect an empirical approach to testing our message will be important.
"We will have content there to help people learn about the core concepts behind EA, as well as lots of links to other organisations" One thing psychological research warns about is the "curse of choice" -- give people too many options, and they end up choosing nothing (or they choose the easiest, as per your "give 1% to Oxfam and they're done" example). Organizing the large amount of information and options available such that no one is scared off will be a difficult but vital task.
I agree. My current best guess is to provide just one or two key actions to take for new users, with the alternative routes still available but not as prominent.
This framework can be thought of as the four stages that we would like people to move through while involved in the EA community. Briefly, the four stages are:
In the US, the book will be published by Gotham, an imprint of Penguin Books USA. In the UK we have a deal with Guardian Faber, a collaboration between publisher Faber and Faber and national newspaper The Guardian. We will be collaborating closely with The Guardian for our UK marketing and media campaign.
Our marketing campaign around the book has three main components: maximising sales in the first week, maximising sales after the opening week, and maximising the flow-through benefits for the EA movement. I won’t go into the strategy on each of these components here to prevent this post from getting too long.
Will has pledged his profits from book sales will either be reinvested in marketing or be donated to effective charities. Peter Singer is also currently working on a more academic book about EA, and he and William are coordinating campaigns so as to increase the impact of these publications.
We are contractually obliged to undertake a ‘media silence’ in the US in first half of 2015. This is so that we can increase our chances of appearing in the major US media outlets in launch week in summer 2015 as we would not have been in them for the past six months.
In the UK, because of our partnership with the Guardian, we will probably do some media outreach in the first half of 2015, however this is still under negotiation.
EffectiveAltruism.org will not itself be providing large numbers of volunteering opportunities for people to get involved in, nor will it be coordinating chapters or meet ups. It will simply be publicising these opportunities. We hope that groups such as .impact and the growing number of different effective altruist organisations will help provide these volunteering and meet-up opportunities.
There are a few initiatives that we would like to take on if others in the EA community do not take them on first. These include setting up a mentoring scheme within the community, and undertaking an initiative to make it easier for EA donors to fund new EA projects.
For example, the specific concept and message of EA is likely to be determined early on. But currently no-one is doing brand management for this. There is a risk that the concept becomes too weird (e.g. sole focus on existential risks from artificial intelligence), too mainstream (giving 1% to Oxfam is ‘effective altruism’), becomes too dominated by one specific cause-area, or otherwise starts to develop the wrong attributes (too aggressive, not welcoming, not having high enough epistemic standards). We will be carefully monitoring each of these risks throughout our media campaign and defending against them.
The second audience we hope to reach out to is certain types of VIPs. We have noticed that our successes to date across most areas, whether in moving money to effective charities, fundraising, raising the profile of effective altruism, or our policy advocacy, have usually been reliant on a surprisingly small number of particularly influential people that we have reached out to. We would like to focus more of our efforts on these VIPs in order to increase the overall impact of our work.
In my role as Director of Special Projects at the Centre for Effective Altruism I split my time between this project and the Global Priorities Project. Part of my time over the coming weeks will be spent coordinating the media launch of the Global Priorities Projects report on Unprecedented Technological Risk with the Future of Humanity Institute and the Oxford Martin School. However in the future I aim to spend approximately 80% of my time on the EA Outreach project. I am currently developing a more in-depth strategy for the project, which we will then take to The Guardian to get buy-in before moving going ahead with it.
If funding allows we would like to hire someone with PR and marketing experience to do the day-to-day coordination of the marketing and media campaigns for this project. We have identified a couple of candidates for this role in our recent recruitment round. We have also identified web developers who have offered to develop the sites discussed above for significantly reduced rates. We will start on these projects once the overall strategy is finalised.
I am always keen to hear people’s feedback and suggestions, so please do comment below if you have thoughts about the strategy outlined above.
Is the movement-building strategy based on the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behaviour change? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transtheoretical_model
No, it was not based on the TMM, though I can see that there are some rough similarities (i.e. these are both stage-based models of human engagement).