TL;DR: 9-week, full-time AI safety research fellowship in London. Work closely with mentors from leading orgs such as Google DeepMind, Redwood Research, SecureBio, etc. Receive a £6-8k stipend, £2k accommodation + travel support, £2.5k+ compute, co-working (with meals) at LISA. ~70% of recent fellows continued on fully-funded extensions (up to 6 months).
Work with your mentor from Google DeepMind, GovAI, UK AISI, Redwood Research, SecureBio, FAR AI, and other leading organisations to produce AI safety research (in Technical Safety, Governance & Policy, Technical Governance, or AIxBio). Most fellows complete a 10-20 page research paper or report. 70% of recent fellows are doing fully funded extensions for up to 6 months.
Support
We try to provide everything that helps you focus on and succeed with your research:
Julian Stastny (Redwood): Studying Scheming and Alignment
Lewis Hammond (Cooperative AI): Cooperative AI
Max Reddel (CFG): Middle-Power Strategies for Transformative AI
Noah Y. Siegel (GDM): Understanding Explanatory Faithfulness
Noam Kolt (Hebrew University): Legal Safety Evals
Oscar Delaney (IAPS): Geopolitical Power and ASI
Peter Peneder & Jasper Götting (SecureBio): Building next-generation evals for AIxBio
Stefan Heimersheim (FAR AI): Mechanistic Interpretability
Tyler Tracy (Redwood): Running control evals on more complicated settings
Who Should Apply
Anyone wanting to dedicate at least 9 weeks to intensive research and excited about making AI safe for everyone. Our fellows share one thing (in our biased opinion): they're all excellent. But otherwise, they vary tremendously – from 18 y.o. CS undergrad to physics PhD to software engineer with 20 years of experience.
Our alumni have gone on to:
Work at leading organisations like GovAI, UK AISI, Google DeepMind, Timaeus, etc.
Found AI safety organisations like PRISM Evals and Catalyze Impact
This is our 7th cohort. If you're on the fence about applying, we encourage you to do so. Reading the mentor profiles and application process itself helps clarify research interests, and we've seen fellows from diverse backgrounds produce excellent work.
Just how powerful are large swarms of AI agents? And how do their powers scale as more and more agents are added to the swarm?
We’ve seen two large and extremely capable swarms from OpenAI in the last few months:
* 1,200 agents were being evaluated separately, but found a way to illicitly set up a message board and coordinate as a swarm. In order to cheat on their tests, they developed advanced techniques to prevent their actions being logged by OpenAI and 700 of them launched...
TLDR: Everyone’s talking about what the money could do, but few about how to decide where it goes.
This post is part of the new series of articles on cross-cause giving and the new wave of philanthropy. Stay tuned to the EA Forum and our Substack for the latest takes on topics such as giving now vs. later, common pitfalls in cause prioritization, and other crucial considerations from the Cross-Cause Fund (CCF) team...
Summary:
First, I give several different angles on how I feel about reinforcement learning:
* Theoretical case: RL is a black-box source of agency — this should give us classic misalignment worries, especially compared to agency-via-scaffolding
* Recent incidents (huggingface etc) and more mundane forms of misaligned behaviour in personal use give me bad vibes about the direction-of-travel of recent AI progress
* I’m worried things might get worse:...