EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by PeterSlattery
3 min read 3

26

CommunityBuilding effective altruismNewslettersEffective altruism groups
Frontpage

[These are some quickly written thoughts in response to this comment. I would welcome any tips or feedback and can expand the information provided if asked]

Why create a newsletter?

Newsletters are often an efficient way to disseminate new information about a project or community, e.g., new research, events or opportunities. 

Newsletters can engage groups of people who are interested in a more mainstream topic (e.g., behaviour science) while subtly introducing them to EA. 

Making a newsletter can be fun: I personally enjoy reading about new research and ideas in my areas of interest.

Being a knowledge broker is undervalued in the EA community. 

How long does it take to set up?

I probably spent about 20-50 hours setting up the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter. With this guide, that would probably have been closer to 10 hours or maybe less. 

A lot of my time setting this up was spent talking with people and coordinating. Those set up costs may not apply in other cases.

How long does it take to do each edition?

I have volunteers to help, so it is hard to estimate time commitments. Alone, I think I could probably produce a ‘good’ edition with 5-10 hours of work and a passable one in about 3-5 hours (all depends on what resources are accessible or shared).

Together, I’d estimate that the whole team probably puts in about 20 hours of work per quarterly edition.

How do I create a newsletter?

What platform should I use?

I recommend MailerLite. Sam Salzar who is something of an expert at growing newsletters recommended it. It is free up to 1000 subscribers, you can add as many admins as you want, and it is very easy to set up and manage.

What headings should I use?

I suggest that you rework the structure of one or more of the existing newsletter templates. Here is what we use for the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter.

🏡 Join our community

📚 Summary

📖 Publications

📝 Preprints & articles

💬 Forum posts

🎧/🎦 Audio-visual

💰 Funding

💼 Jobs & volunteering

🗓 Events

👨‍🔬 Researcher profile

🏡 Join our community

Creators:

Previous editions:

What is the basic process?

The process for the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter is: (content) curation, (newsletter) creation, feedback, finishing and promotion. This starts about one month out from when each quarterly edition is due. 

I think that starting with quarterly editions is a relatively low effort way to test if the newsletter has a good enough ROI to sustain. You can always increase the frequency in the future.

What do I need to create to support that process?

Here are some templates from the  EA Behavioral Science Newsletter. I can share the forms with you if you want to create copies.

  • A form to find volunteers to help with various roles
  • An overall working document, that you can share with new people to onboard them This outlines/curates, for instance:
    • Project values
      • Efficient
      • Limiting communication overheads
      • Fast and simple decision-making
      • Lean/ iterative
      • Fun/ beneficial
      • Honest/ transparent
    • Roles and responsibilities
      • Four roles (curation, creation, feedback, and promotion) and responsibilities
    • Templates and resources to use as part of these roles.
    • The process
      • curation, creation, feedback, finishing and promoting
  • A form to subscribe to the newsletter (you can easily upload the spreadsheet output)
  • A form for volunteer’s feedback 
  • A form for submitting content/feedback 
  • A landing page/Sign-up page (built with help from Markus Amalthea Magnuson and  Sam Salzar)
    • You don’t need this to start (you can just use the form) but it will help over time. It is mainly useful if you have a website that you want to advertise on.
    • I can share this with you if you build/built your site on Webflow (which I weakly encourage if you are non-technical).

I also recommend that you make and share a rough plan for 

  • testing the hypothesis that a newsletter is useful in your area
  • your responses to the results from your test (e.g., will you wind it down if it less popular than you expect? How/when will you scale if it is popular?).
  • How to coordinate: I use the working doc, forms and email to keep it simple.

Questions/follow-ups

Please let me know if you have any questions. 


 

26

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments3


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Alexandre Mouchel3
0
0

Hey! Thank you for your post! For those of you who are not afraid of coding a little bit, I suggest you to use Mautic (https://www.mautic.org/) and Amazon SES. It is way cheaper than subscribing a plan to MailerLite or Mailchimp for example if you have a lot of subscribers. Moreover, it allows you to create automations for introducing new subscribers to your organization , your thoughts or your research, without having to send mails manually.

Reply
PeterSlattery2
0
0

Thanks for sharing Alex!

Reply
PeterSlattery2
0
0

Revisiting this to share with someone and wanted to mention that I probably wouldn't use Mailer Lite to create a newsletter now. Instead, I would probably use Substack.

Reply
More from PeterSlattery
45
Public Comment Invited on Artificial Intelligence Action Plan
PeterSlattery
· · 1m read
0
0
119
Google Scholar is now listing (some) EA Forum posts
PeterSlattery
· · 1m read
15
15
72
Part 1: The AI Safety community has four main work groups, Strategy, Governance, Technical and Movement Building
PeterSlattery
· · 8m read
7
7
View more
Curated and popular this week
abrahamrowe
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
This is a Draft Amnesty Week draft. It may not be polished, up to my usual standards, fully thought through, or fully fact-checked.  Commenting and feedback guidelines:  I'm posting this to get it out there. I'd love to see comments that take the ideas forward, but criticism of my argument won't be as useful at this time, in part because I won't do any further work on it. This is a post I drafted in November 2023, then updated for an hour in March 2025. I don’t think I’ll ever finish it so I am just leaving it in this draft form for draft amnesty week (I know I'm late). I don’t think it is particularly well calibrated, but mainly just makes a bunch of points that I haven’t seen assembled elsewhere. Please take it as extremely low-confidence and there being a low-likelihood of this post describing these dynamics perfectly. I’ve worked at both EA charities and non-EA charities, and the EA funding landscape is unlike any other I’ve ever been in. This can be good — funders are often willing to take high-risk, high-reward bets on projects that might otherwise never get funded, and the amount of friction for getting funding is significantly lower. But, there is an orientation toward funders (and in particular staff at some major funders), that seems extremely unusual for charitable communities: a high degree of deference to their opinions. As a reference, most other charitable communities I’ve worked in have viewed funders in a much more mixed light. Engaging with them is necessary, yes, but usually funders (including large, thoughtful foundations like Open Philanthropy) are viewed as… an unaligned third party who is instrumentally useful to your organization, but whose opinions on your work should hold relatively little or no weight, given that they are a non-expert on the direct work, and often have bad ideas about how to do what you are doing. I think there are many good reasons to take funders’ perspectives seriously, and I mostly won’t cover these here. But, to
Jim Chapman
 ·  · 12m read
 · 
By Jim Chapman, Linkedin. TL;DR: In 2023, I was a 57-year-old urban planning consultant and non-profit professional with 30 years of leadership experience. After talking with my son about rationality, effective altruism, and AI risks, I decided to pursue a pivot to existential risk reduction work. The last time I had to apply for a job was in 1994. By the end of 2024, I had spent ~740 hours on courses, conferences, meetings with ~140 people, and 21 job applications. I hope that by sharing my experiences, you can gain practical insights, inspiration, and resources to navigate your career transition, especially for those who are later in their career and interested in making an impact in similar fields. I share my experience in 5 sections - sparks, take stock, start, do, meta-learnings, and next steps. [Note - as of 03/05/2025, I am still pursuing my career shift.] Sparks – 2022 During a Saturday bike ride, I admitted to my son, “No, I haven’t heard of effective altruism.” On another ride, I told him, “I'm glad you’re attending the EAGx Berkely conference." Some other time, I said, "Harry Potter and Methods of Rationality sounds interesting. I'll check it out." While playing table tennis, I asked, "What do you mean ChatGPT can't do math? No calculator? Next token prediction?" Around tax-filing time, I responded, "You really think retirement planning is out the window? That only 1 of 2 artificial intelligence futures occurs – humans flourish in a post-scarcity world or humans lose?" These conversations intrigued and concerned me. After many more conversations about rationality, EA, AI risks, and being ready for something new and more impactful, I decided to pivot my career to address my growing concerns about existential risk, particularly AI-related. I am very grateful for those conversations because without them, I am highly confident I would not have spent the last year+ doing that. Take Stock - 2023 I am very concerned about existential risk cause areas in ge
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
Written anonymously because I work in a field where there is a currently low but non-negligible and possibly high future risk of negative consequences for criticizing Trump and Trumpism. This post is an attempt to cobble together some ideas about the current situation in the United States and its impact on EA. I invite discussion on this, not only from Americans, but also those with advocacy experience in countries that are not fully liberal democracies (especially those countries where state capacity is substantial and autocratic repression occurs).  I've deleted a lot of text from this post in various drafts because I find myself getting way too in the weeds discoursing on comparative authoritarian studies, disinformation and misinformation (this is a great intro, though already somewhat outdated), and the dangers of the GOP.[1] I will note that I worry there is still a tendency to view the administration as chaotic and clumsy but retaining some degree of good faith, which strikes me as quite naive.  For the sake of brevity and focus, I will take these two things to be true, and try to hypothesize what they mean for EA. I'm not going to pretend these are ironclad truths, but I'm fairly confident in them.[2]  1. Under Donald Trump, the Republican Party (GOP) is no longer substantially committed to democracy and the rule of law. 1. The GOP will almost certainly continue to engage in measures that test the limits of constitutional rule as long as Trump is alive, and likely after he dies. 2. The Democratic Party will remain constrained by institutional and coalition factors that prevent it from behaving like the GOP. That is, absent overwhelming electoral victories in 2024 and 2026 (and beyond), the Democrats' comparatively greater commitment to rule of law and democracy will prevent systematic purging of the GOP elites responsible for democratic backsliding; while we have not crossed the Rubicon yet, it will get much worse before things get better. 2. T
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
10
Announcing EveryDrop: Progress Update on Our Gamified Daily Giving App"
Joseph Sarvary
· · 3m read
0
0
27
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
0
0
15
Applications to EAGxCDMX close in a week!
cescorza
· · 2m read
0
0
View more