EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
High Impact Professionals5
0
0

Hi Anjay, thanks for the shoutout and we at HIP couldn't agree more that EA workplace and professional groups are important: that is why we are putting such a focus on them in our organization. 

If anyone is interested in starting a group at their organization or for their industry, please pm us here. Also, we are going to publish a current list of workplace and professional groups on our site and in the forum some time next week, so look out for that if you are a professional looking to join a group.

Reply
See in context
by AF
4 min read 1

22

CommunityCommunity Builder Writing ContestWorkplace advocacyWorkplace groups
Frontpage

(Epistemic Status: Uncertain and from an outside view – Talent bottlenecks keep invading my thoughts in the shower; I just want them to stop)

Tl;dr: If you are someone who either works or will begin working at a non-EA company this summer, consider joining, supporting or starting a workplace or professional EA group. It seems like a great way to contribute to EA community building and you might be well-placed to reach EA-aligned people that others in the community can’t. 

The argument

  • The EA movement and the longtermist causes are famously talent constrained (see here, here, here, etc.)
  • One demographic needed in EA orgs and prioritized cause areas is mid and senior-career professionals who have experience with people, project & product management, software engineering, ML engineering, operations, etc. [1]
  • These people are beyond the reach of university EA groups and may also be difficult to reach through city EA groups [2]
  • However, workplace and professional EA groups at companies have the potential to reach new people and/or support the retention of existing members of the EA community. They can also play an important role in fostering connections between these and other parts of the EA community, especially by helping people connect the dots. [3]
  • You may or may not be in the right position to share EA with employees directly, but you can support an existing group or active EAs who are more permanently present in the company or profession to create such a group. [4]
  • Moreover, I feel confident that you can think hard, start a conversation in the comment threads and talk to people from organizations like High Impact Professionals (HIP), the Center for Effective Altruism (CEA) esp. Jona Glade, the EA Consulting Network (EACN), etc. and maybe me (?), to determine your theory of change for supporting a Workplace and Professional EA group and whether this is worthwhile for you.

Some additional details

  • With the amount of university EA groups popping up and thriving, there will likely be a large demand for Workplace and Professional EA groups in a few years
    • Yes, some students will go on to pursue direct work like research or entrepreneurship. A lot however, maybe the majority, will start their careers skilling up at various non-EA companies.
    • Creating a community for them as they transition from university to the workplace seems all around great
    • These groups could also support a lot for coordination between different parts of the EA community
  • The different environment of Workplace and Professional EA groups compared to University EA groups can have a significant effect on your theory of change and activities

Some objections and caveats:

  • Wait… this seems risky – Are you really expecting me to talk the ears off my boss and coworkers about EA?
    • No!! Please don’t and my intention is not to actively encourage that. Truthfully, I am not fully sure what I am encouraging – just that those interested in EA group organizing think hard about how they can support growing the number of mid and senior career people in EA
    • The goal is to support efforts that make Effective Altruism accessible to aligned professionals, including mid and senior-level professionals, NOT to poach talent
  • Is this really better than the opportunity cost of my time?
    • Often, it can make sense to just focus on building your brand, developing a good reputation and being successful at your job, especially in the first few years of your career. If this describes you, prioritize that!
    • If you are able to support university community building, it might make sense to prioritize that since students tend to be more open to EA.
  • There is already a thriving workplace EA group at my company
    • It may be worth considering whether you can just support the work of others by doing logistical tasks or freeing up their time to do more impactful, internal community building
    • If you are an organizer of such a workplace group, consider posting or commenting about how different people can support you

Next steps

  • Check here if the company/organization you are working for has a group and proceed accordingly.
    • You can connect to organizers at the company or find active EAs via Giving What We Can (GWWC), Linked-In, the Forum Community features.
  • Depending on who you are, you could:
    • Start a Workplace or Professional EA group – more advisable for those already working at the company or in a field for some time, but you could also try to find or encourage someone else to start one
    • Support a Workplace or Professional EA group – for anyone wanting to contribute, but consider if you might be better placed to do something else like organize a university group or work really hard to build your brand
    • Join a Workplace or Professional EA group – for everyone! :)
  • Start thinking about other ideas… here are two:
    • Consider running / supporting a retreat for your Workplace or Professional group
    • Connect already EA-aligned people with others in the community according to their skills and experiences
      • There might be reasons to think that these people aren’t well-connected to the movement and are underestimating the impact they can make in EA orgs or in top cause areas
      • There might be a lot of room for this specifically in AI Safety, Biosecurity and the longtermism community where there are a lot of opportunities and funding but not enough experienced individuals
  • Check out some of these resources and posts that could be helpful[5]

 

Thanks to Jona Glade and ES for providing comments on a draft of this. Please note that this is my perspective and might not entirely represent the perspective of Jona and E. My primary intention with this post is to start a conversation about Workplace and Professional EA groups and present some arguments for focusing on them more, so please let me know what you think. Are you convinced to support one?

  1. ^

    Based on general output and conversations with multiple people from various organizations in the movement. Also kinda odd since 50% are professionals in non-EA orgs from this post)

  2. ^

    Just an intuition, but also mid-career employees seem outside the scope of city groups especially since they have families. (see this comment on this post)

  3. ^

    I really like the framing in this post from someone who made a career change and discusses the pushes, pulls, signs and connecting of dots that contributed to their eventually decision to switch to an EA org. More generally, I think that just being someone who is aware of many different opportunities and sub-communities in EA and who can connect others is so valuable to helping the right people do the right things.

  1. ^

    It seems very important that people in workplaces are sensitive about sharing an outside idea like EA since companies can differ in culture, openness, etc.

  2. ^
Show all footnotes

22

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
High Impact Professionals5
0
0

Hi Anjay, thanks for the shoutout and we at HIP couldn't agree more that EA workplace and professional groups are important: that is why we are putting such a focus on them in our organization. 

If anyone is interested in starting a group at their organization or for their industry, please pm us here. Also, we are going to publish a current list of workplace and professional groups on our site and in the forum some time next week, so look out for that if you are a professional looking to join a group.

Reply
More from AF
61
Apply to the Constellation Visiting Researcher Program and Astra Fellowship, in Berkeley this Winter
4 authors
· · 1m read
4
4
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Are you looking for a project where you could substantially improve indoor air quality, with benefits both to general health and reducing pandemic risk? I've written a bunch about air purifiers over the past few years, and its frustrating how bad commercial market is. The most glaring problem is the widespread use of HEPA filters. These are very effective filters that, unavoidably, offer significant resistance to air flow. HEPA is a great option for filtering air in single pass, such as with an outdoor air intake or a biosafety cabinet, but it's the wrong set of tradeoffs for cleaning the air that's already in the room. Air passing through a HEPA filter removes 99.97% of particles, but then it's mixed back in with the rest of the room air. If you can instead remove 99% of particles from 2% more air, or 90% from 15% more air, you're delivering more clean air. We should compare in-room purifiers on their Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR), not whether the filters are HEPA. Next is noise. Let's say you do know that CADR is what counts, and you go looking at purifiers. You've decided you need 250 CFM, and you get something that says it can do that. Except once it's set up in the room it's too noisy and you end up running it on low, getting just 75 CFM. Everywhere I go I see purifiers that are either set too low to achieve much or are just switched off. High CADR with low noise is critical. Then consider filter replacement. There's a competitive market for standardized filters, where most HVAC systems use one of a small number of filter sizes. Air purifiers, though, just about always use their own custom filters. Some of this is the mistaken insistence on HEPA filters, but I suspect there's also a "cheap razors, expensive blades" component where manufacturers make their real money on consumables. Then there's placement. Manufacturers put the buttons on the top and send air upwards, because they're designing them to sit on the floor. But a purifier on the floor takes up
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
[Note: I (the primary author) am writing this entirely in a personal capacity. Funding for the bounty and donations mentioned in this post comes entirely from personal savings and the generosity of friends and family. Colleagues at Open Philanthropy (my employer) reviewed this post at my request, but this project is completely unaffiliated with Open Philanthropy.]   In 2023, GiveWell reported that it received over $250M from more than 30,000 donors, excluding Open Philanthropy. I expect (though haven’t confirmed) that at least $50M of this came from unmatched retail donations, meaning from individuals who don’t work at a company that offers a donation match. I can’t help but hope that there may be some way to offer these donors a source of matching funds that wouldn’t otherwise go toward charitable causes. Over the last couple of years, friends and I have spent >100 hours looking into potential legal, collaborative corporate donation matching opportunities. I think there may be promising ways to partner with corporate donors, but I haven’t found a way forward that I am comfortable with, and I don’t think I’m the best person to continue work on this project. Some donors may be choosing to give through surrogates (friends who work at companies that match donations) without understanding the risks involved. My understanding is that there can be several (particularly if donors send surrogates money conditionally, e.g., by asking them to sign an agreement to give through their company’s match): * The surrogate might inadvertently violate their company’s terms for donation matching. * The surrogate, donor, or company might fail an IRS audit if they don’t correctly report the donations + match. * The surrogate or donor might be sued by the company. * The company might discontinue its matching program and/or claw back funds from recipient nonprofits. “Getting to yes” with a corporate partner in a completely legal, transparent, and good faith way could direct signi
Recent opportunities in Community
11
Local groups should do more fundraising
Jonas Søvik
· · 1m read
0
0
54
Build a walkable campus with fellow EAs
tyleralterman
· · 1m read
4
4
30
Apply to help run EAGxIndia 2025!
3 authors
· · 1m read
0
0
View more