I was recently recalling my early days as an entrepreneur, and thought I’d share my post-mortem thoughts on what I wish I’d done differently.

For background context, I currently am a business coach and workflow optimization consultant. I help organizations run more effectively and provide skills training by way of the EA operations fellowship.

When I started out on my own, I chose to be a solopreneur because it fit my lifestyle well, and I had the technical expertise to be able to do well. That was all true, but what I didn’t have was experience being an entrepreneur. I had the mentality that I could learn anything from books and research, and that if I put my mind to anything, I could make it be successful. And although I still believe that is mostly true, I now believe even more in asking for help to compensate for my weaknesses, blind spots, and lack of experience in whatever areas I need help with.

Although I ultimately succeeded as an entrepreneur, it was a pretty challenging and draining journey. It burned me out on so many levels. I made so many costly mistakes. I didn’t know what networking meant or why I needed to do it. I didn’t know how to create a strategic plan to develop my business, so it took a while to gain the traction I wanted. In a notable instance, I had to refund a client’s fees because I was clueless about the contractual legalities and didn’t have a good lawyer then. Ultimately, I did learn a whole lot and gained a lot of expertise as I went through it – but it had a big price: my mental and physical health, burnout, and a much longer timeline to success, profitability and impact. I’m still recovering from that all (it’s even harder as a mom post-pandemic!), but I’m still thankful every day that I have the lifestyle I want and I can earn enough to support my family. I just really wish that I had had more support back when I started.

My current “theology” on business/organization success is that its leaders need three core things in order to succeed: 

  1. Access to relevant knowledge and education (books, podcasts, mentors)
  2. Having accountability partners (this can take the form of coaching)
  3. Being part of a supportive community (online or in person, networking groups, friends)

I had #1 – lots of education and books. 

So why didn’t I get the rest of the support that I needed? Well, I was thrifty, in a silo, and slightly arrogant in that I thought I could learn everything from books. While I did learn a lot from books, nothing can replace real-life experience. That taught me so much more. I wish I had had someone guiding me, telling me what made sense and what didn’t, what traps to avoid, and what to focus my efforts on. I had no social support either – I was the only female entrepreneur that I knew in my religious community (which we’ve since left) and I had no idea how to tap into the secular network. I was a trailblazer and proud of it, and I felt that I didn’t need help and definitely didn’t want to pay for it. Now I realize how much of a mistake that was, and I make sure to surround myself by experts who help me achieve my fullest potential.

If I could go back and tell my 23-year-old self how to be smarter about the process, I would have told her to join some networking and business development groups. I would have told her to get a business coach to help develop ideas and create a good, profitable, strategic business plan. I would have pointed out the higher margins of profit, impact and stability that I would be likely to see if I had expert assistance.  It would have been so much easier, so much healthier, and so much more impactful if I had the right guidance early on in my business development.

The bottom line is: Surround yourself with support. Get mentors. You’re not alone and you shouldn’t be. 

It doesn’t matter whom you use as your mentor or coach – it matters that they understand your industry and goals, that they connect well with you, and that you trust each other. It’s often important to seek paid help instead of pro-bono, because then you’re both invested in the relationship [1]. If you’re focused on a cause area and think that it’s important, then it deserves your investment of time and resources to make as impactful as you can get it to be. And for that to happen, you need your community of support people. People doing similar things, people in mentorship roles, people who have similar challenges – they’re all important. If you want your organization to be successful, the “one thing[2]” you can do to help it is to give it the right support and direction early on.

I’m happy to chat with anyone who has any questions, or if you’re looking for a coach – I represent all the members of EASE (and myself) and would love to get you set up with the support that will make all the difference. Feel free to pick a time on my calendar or send me a PM or email


Good luck on your journey!

  1. ^

    Pro bono is definitely acceptable in some cases; I take a few pro bono cases myself, but not more than 1 or 2 clients at a time. Often, though, the client takes it less seriously since it’s not as costly to them. And good providers should be earning money off their practice, so you’re less likely to find a pro bono coach.

  2. ^

    What is the ONE thing that you can do that will make everything else afterward simpler or easier? Based on this book or read up on the theory here.

     

     

32

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I relate to this a lot! The idea of having access to books, but not having the other two really resonates with what my entire post-college life has been so far.

Gosh I really admire your story and your strength!

Curated and popular this week
abrahamrowe
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
This is a Draft Amnesty Week draft. It may not be polished, up to my usual standards, fully thought through, or fully fact-checked.  Commenting and feedback guidelines:  I'm posting this to get it out there. I'd love to see comments that take the ideas forward, but criticism of my argument won't be as useful at this time, in part because I won't do any further work on it. This is a post I drafted in November 2023, then updated for an hour in March 2025. I don’t think I’ll ever finish it so I am just leaving it in this draft form for draft amnesty week (I know I'm late). I don’t think it is particularly well calibrated, but mainly just makes a bunch of points that I haven’t seen assembled elsewhere. Please take it as extremely low-confidence and there being a low-likelihood of this post describing these dynamics perfectly. I’ve worked at both EA charities and non-EA charities, and the EA funding landscape is unlike any other I’ve ever been in. This can be good — funders are often willing to take high-risk, high-reward bets on projects that might otherwise never get funded, and the amount of friction for getting funding is significantly lower. But, there is an orientation toward funders (and in particular staff at some major funders), that seems extremely unusual for charitable communities: a high degree of deference to their opinions. As a reference, most other charitable communities I’ve worked in have viewed funders in a much more mixed light. Engaging with them is necessary, yes, but usually funders (including large, thoughtful foundations like Open Philanthropy) are viewed as… an unaligned third party who is instrumentally useful to your organization, but whose opinions on your work should hold relatively little or no weight, given that they are a non-expert on the direct work, and often have bad ideas about how to do what you are doing. I think there are many good reasons to take funders’ perspectives seriously, and I mostly won’t cover these here. But, to
Jim Chapman
 ·  · 12m read
 · 
By Jim Chapman, Linkedin. TL;DR: In 2023, I was a 57-year-old urban planning consultant and non-profit professional with 30 years of leadership experience. After talking with my son about rationality, effective altruism, and AI risks, I decided to pursue a pivot to existential risk reduction work. The last time I had to apply for a job was in 1994. By the end of 2024, I had spent ~740 hours on courses, conferences, meetings with ~140 people, and 21 job applications. I hope that by sharing my experiences, you can gain practical insights, inspiration, and resources to navigate your career transition, especially for those who are later in their career and interested in making an impact in similar fields. I share my experience in 5 sections - sparks, take stock, start, do, meta-learnings, and next steps. [Note - as of 03/05/2025, I am still pursuing my career shift.] Sparks – 2022 During a Saturday bike ride, I admitted to my son, “No, I haven’t heard of effective altruism.” On another ride, I told him, “I'm glad you’re attending the EAGx Berkely conference." Some other time, I said, "Harry Potter and Methods of Rationality sounds interesting. I'll check it out." While playing table tennis, I asked, "What do you mean ChatGPT can't do math? No calculator? Next token prediction?" Around tax-filing time, I responded, "You really think retirement planning is out the window? That only 1 of 2 artificial intelligence futures occurs – humans flourish in a post-scarcity world or humans lose?" These conversations intrigued and concerned me. After many more conversations about rationality, EA, AI risks, and being ready for something new and more impactful, I decided to pivot my career to address my growing concerns about existential risk, particularly AI-related. I am very grateful for those conversations because without them, I am highly confident I would not have spent the last year+ doing that. Take Stock - 2023 I am very concerned about existential risk cause areas in ge
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
Written anonymously because I work in a field where there is a currently low but non-negligible and possibly high future risk of negative consequences for criticizing Trump and Trumpism. This post is an attempt to cobble together some ideas about the current situation in the United States and its impact on EA. I invite discussion on this, not only from Americans, but also those with advocacy experience in countries that are not fully liberal democracies (especially those countries where state capacity is substantial and autocratic repression occurs).  I've deleted a lot of text from this post in various drafts because I find myself getting way too in the weeds discoursing on comparative authoritarian studies, disinformation and misinformation (this is a great intro, though already somewhat outdated), and the dangers of the GOP.[1] I will note that I worry there is still a tendency to view the administration as chaotic and clumsy but retaining some degree of good faith, which strikes me as quite naive.  For the sake of brevity and focus, I will take these two things to be true, and try to hypothesize what they mean for EA. I'm not going to pretend these are ironclad truths, but I'm fairly confident in them.[2]  1. Under Donald Trump, the Republican Party (GOP) is no longer substantially committed to democracy and the rule of law. 1. The GOP will almost certainly continue to engage in measures that test the limits of constitutional rule as long as Trump is alive, and likely after he dies. 2. The Democratic Party will remain constrained by institutional and coalition factors that prevent it from behaving like the GOP. That is, absent overwhelming electoral victories in 2024 and 2026 (and beyond), the Democrats' comparatively greater commitment to rule of law and democracy will prevent systematic purging of the GOP elites responsible for democratic backsliding; while we have not crossed the Rubicon yet, it will get much worse before things get better. 2. T