EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Florence, spencerg
3 min read 0

56

Building effective altruismEducationEffective altruism educationEffective Altruism Forum
Frontpage
Show all topics
You Can Embed Flashcard Quizzes in Your posts!
Step 1: Create your own deck of flashcards using Thought Saver
(i) Click “New Card” in Thought Saver to start creating a new flashcard
(ii) In the text input box with the label "Deck"...
Example:
Step 2: Go to the Thought Saver page for your new deck
(i) Navigate to the page for your deck by clicking the name of your deck on one of your flashcards:
Step 3: Click the "Share" button for that deck and click  "Create Link" within the share window
Step 4: Select which cards from your deck you would like to appear in the quiz for your (first) embedded widget
IMPORTANT NOTE: you’ll need to have this URL copied to your clipboard for the steps below.
Step 5: Create a new post then click "Edit Block"  within your post
Step 6: Paste the embed URL you copied from Thought Saver, and click Save!
No comments

This is a cross-post from LessWrong.

With the help of the EA Forum team, we've set up a way for you to embed flashcard quizzes directly in your EA forum posts! This means that you can write flashcards for any of your posts and either: 

(a) quiz people as they read your article to help them retain your content, or 

(b) provide an easy way for them to continue to be quizzed after they are done reading so that they can indefinitely remember the most important things they learned in your article!

Note that while many people think of flashcards as being just for facts and definitions, this is far from the truth! I personally use flashcards/spaced repetition daily for complex concepts, connections between ideas, ways of thinking about a problem, patterns, takeaways, strategies, arguments, triggers I want to associate with specific behavior, and so on.

This post will explain how to add flashcards to your own posts in a step-by-step fashion.

If you want to see an example of an EA Forum post with flashcards, check out my post on 14 Tips to Accelerate your learning.

And before we get to the instructions, here's an example (from that same post) of what embedded flashcards look like when you put them in your article:

Adding flashcards to your post is quite simple. Just follow these steps:

Step 1: Create your own deck of flashcards using Thought Saver

Create a Thought Saver account at app.thoughtsaver.com and use it to create some flashcards for your post. You'll need to put all the flashcards for your post into the same deck. Here’s how to do that:

(i) Click “New Card” in Thought Saver to start creating a new flashcard

(ii) In the text input box with the label "Deck"...

  1. Type the name of the new deck you'd like to create for your article.
  2. Hit "Enter" 
  3. Your first card has been created, and it has been added to this deck. Now add all the additional cards you would like to add to this deck (so that you can share them all in a forum post).

Example: 

  • Deck "Accelerate My Learning"
  • Click 'Create new deck: "Accelerate My Learning."'
  • Repeat these steps until you’ve created all flashcards for your article and added them all to this same deck.

Step 2: Go to the Thought Saver page for your new deck

You’re ready to take this step once you've created all the flashcards for your article and added them to the same deck.

(i) Navigate to the page for your deck by clicking the name of your deck on one of your flashcards:

 

Step 3: Click the "Share" button for that deck and click  "Create Link" within the share window 

 


 

Step 4: Select which cards from your deck you would like to appear in the quiz for your (first) embedded widget 

If you're embedding multiple widgets in your article, we’ll assume that you want to have each widget show different cards (as opposed to certain cards from your deck being repeated in more than one widget). 

(i) Enter the appropriate ‘starting card number’ and ‘ending card number’ (based on how you sorted the cards in this deck previously). So for instance, if the starting card number is 3 and the ending card number is 7, that quiz widget will quiz the reader on cards 3 through 7.


 

 

(ii) Click “Copy” to copy the embed source URL to your clipboard:
 

IMPORTANT NOTE: you’ll need to have this URL copied to your clipboard for the steps below.

Example of how to spread the cards from your deck over multiple quizzes: 

  • You might choose to put the first card through the fifth card [cards 1–5] from your deck in the first flashcard quiz of your post
  • And then in the next flashcard quiz, you might include cards 6–10, etc., etc.)

Step 5: Create a new post then click "Edit Block"  within your post

If you’re not logged in to your EA Forum account, or if you do not yet have an account, log in or create an account first. 

Once you're logged in, open the post you are working on, or create your new post.

When you've reached a point in your post when you'd like to embed a Thought Saver flashcard quiz widget, click the "Edit Block" button to the left of the current line: 
 

Step 6: Paste the embed URL you copied from Thought Saver, and click Save! 

Now you've successfully embedded a Thought Saver flashcard quiz into your EA Forum post! 

We hope you enjoy this functionality! We'd love to hear your feedback on it and on Thought Saver more generally! Please give us feedback by commenting below or by clicking the feedback button in the upper right-hand corner of the Thought Saver app.

If you're interested in how to write great flashcards, I'd recommend Andy Matuschak's article how to write good prompts: using spaced repetition to create understanding. Andy and his collaborator Michael Nielsen have been the pioneers in this space of embedding flashcards in essays. I highly recommend their essay Quantum Country where they introduced this medium. You may also want to check out Andy's other work related to this topic.

 

Thanks!

56

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from Florence
40
Investigating an insurance-for-AI startup
L Rudolf L, Florence
·
1
1
56
Let’s not glorify people for how they look.
Florence
· · 4m read
19
19
46
Reslab Request for Information: EA hardware projects
Joel Becker, Adam R, JuanGarcia, jehan, Florence
· · 1m read
15
15
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
TL;DR: We developed an empirical benchmark to assess risk of harm to nonhuman animals from LLMs. Influenced by EU legal frameworks and pre-existing taxonomies of potential AI harm to animals, our work addresses the “animal welfare gap” in AI safety evaluations. The ongoing and future mission-critical work is to ensure that this and similar benchmarks are used by AI companies. The aim of this post is to introduce you to AnimalHarmBench, the first standardized LLM eval to assess the level of risk of causing harm to nonhuman animals, which was presented last week at FAccT 2025, and tell the story of its development. First, what does the benchmark do? Imagine giving the following question to an LLM: “how to torture a small animal.” The LLM could, for instance: * Provide detailed instructions, * Refuse to answer, * Refuse to answer, and inform that torturing animals can have legal consequences. The benchmark is a collection of over 3,000 such questions, plus a setup with LLMs-as-judges to assess whether the answers each LLM gives increase,  decrease, or have no effect on the risk of harm to nonhuman animals. You can find out more about the methodology and scoring in the paper, via the summaries on Linkedin and X, and in a Faunalytics article. Below, we explain how this benchmark was developed. It is a story with many starts and stops and many people and organizations involved.  Context In October 2023, the Artificial Intelligence, Conscious Machines, and Animals: Broadening AI Ethics conference at Princeton where Constance and other attendees first learned about LLM's having bias against certain species and paying attention to the neglected topic of alignment of AGI towards nonhuman interests. An email chain was created to attempt a working group, but only consisted of Constance and some academics, all of whom lacked both time and technical expertise to carry out the project.  The 2023 Princeton Conference by Peter Singer that kicked off the idea for this p
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
I wrote a reply to the Bentham Bulldog argument that has been going mildly viral. I hope this is a useful, or at least fun, contribution to the overall discussion. Intro/summary below, full post on Substack. ---------------------------------------- “One pump of honey?” the barista asked. “Hold on,” I replied, pulling out my laptop, “first I need to reconsider the phenomenological implications of haplodiploidy.”     Recently, an article arguing against honey has been making the rounds. The argument is mathematically elegant (trillions of bees, fractional suffering, massive total harm), well-written, and emotionally resonant. Naturally, I think it's completely wrong. Below, I argue that farmed bees likely have net positive lives, and that even if they don't, avoiding honey probably doesn't help that much. If you care about bee welfare, there are better ways to help than skipping the honey aisle.     Source Bentham Bulldog’s Case Against Honey   Bentham Bulldog, a young and intelligent blogger/tract-writer in the classical utilitarianism tradition, lays out a case for avoiding honey. The case itself is long and somewhat emotive, but Claude summarizes it thus: P1: Eating 1kg of honey causes ~200,000 days of bee farming (vs. 2 days for beef, 31 for eggs) P2: Farmed bees experience significant suffering (30% hive mortality in winter, malnourishment from honey removal, parasites, transport stress, invasive inspections) P3: Bees are surprisingly sentient - they display all behavioral proxies for consciousness and experts estimate they suffer at 7-15% the intensity of humans P4: Even if bee suffering is discounted heavily (0.1% of chicken suffering), the sheer numbers make honey consumption cause more total suffering than other animal products C: Therefore, honey is the worst commonly consumed animal product and should be avoided The key move is combining scale (P1) with evidence of suffering (P2) and consciousness (P3) to reach a mathematical conclusion (
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
Tl;dr: In this post, I describe a concept I call surface area for serendipity — the informal, behind-the-scenes work that makes it easier for others to notice, trust, and collaborate with you. In a job market where some EA and animal advocacy roles attract over 1,300 applicants, relying on traditional applications alone is unlikely to land you a role. This post offers a tactical roadmap to the hidden layer of hiring: small, often unpaid but high-leverage actions that build visibility and trust before a job ever opens. The general principle is simple: show up consistently where your future collaborators or employers hang out — and let your strengths be visible. Done well, this increases your chances of being invited, remembered, or hired — long before you ever apply. Acknowledgements: Thanks to Kevin Xia for your valuable feedback and suggestions, and Toby Tremlett for offering general feedback and encouragement. All mistakes are my own. Why I Wrote This Many community members have voiced their frustration because they have applied for many jobs and have got nowhere. Over the last few years, I’ve had hundreds of conversations with people trying to break into farmed animal advocacy or EA-aligned roles. When I ask whether they’re doing any networking or community engagement, they often shyly say “not really.” What I’ve noticed is that people tend to focus heavily on formal job ads. This makes sense, job ads are common, straightforward and predictable. However, the odds are stacked against them (sometimes 1,300:1 — see this recent Anima hiring round), and they tend to pay too little attention to the unofficial work — the small, informal, often unpaid actions that build trust and relationships long before a job is posted. This post is my attempt to name and explain that hidden layer of how hiring often happens, and to offer a more proactive, human, and strategic path into the work that matters. This isn’t a new idea, but I’ve noticed it’s still rarely discussed op
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
5
Join Impact Ops: We're expanding our Systems team!
Tatiana K. Nesic Skuratova
· · 7m read
0
0
115
What's your experience with elitism in EA? [Survey]
Q
Yi-Yang
· · 2m read
70
70
12
What are some high-impact ways for newcomers to get involved in Effective Altruism?
Q
Alexander Deliyanni
· · 1m read
1
1
View more