I'm curious if you tracked career changes and/or relevant researched published by the people you had calls with over time?
I'm curious if you tracked career changes and/or relevant researched published by the people you had calls with over time?
I don't think there are other orgs filling Arkose's niche and the data I've seen suggests Arkose was doing a good job. I know funders have good reasons for not sharing their takes on every grant rejection, but it's a shame there isn't more insight into this.
Arkose is an early-stage AI safety fieldbuilding nonprofit focused on accelerating the involvement of experienced machine learning professionals in technical AI safety research through direct outreach, one-on-one calls, and public resources.
Between December 2023 and June 2025, we had one-on-one calls with 311 such professionals. 78% of those professionals said their initial call accelerated their involvement in AI safety[1].
Unfortunately, we’re closing due to a lack of funding. We remain excited about other attempts at direct outreach to this population, and think the right team could have impact here.
Over the past year, we’ve applied for funding from all of the major funders interested in AI safety fieldbuilding work, and several minor funders. Rather than try to massively change what we're doing to appeal to funders, with a short funding runway and little to no feedback, we’re choosing to close down and pursue other options.
As mentioned above, 52% of call participants give feedback immediately after their initial call with us:
179 of our calls were sourced from direct email outreach to authors of work accepted to NeurIPS, ICML, or ICLR, filtered to those most likely to benefit from a call:
We remain excited about this kind of outreach, though we think there are risks here. If you’re considering setting up a project of this type, you’re very welcome to reach out to Victoria at [email protected].
Of 52% who gave feedback immediately after their initial call with Arkose
This is a shame to hear. Do you have any thoughts on why this wasn't appealing to funders despite the positive feedback/survey results?
Unfortunately, we got very little feedback from funders, and frequently none at all. It could be the risks of reaching out to this more senior audience (i.e. the risk of making them less interested in AI safety if the outreach is poor), but this is just a guess. I expect there are a number of factors at play.