EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Kaleem-4
0
0

I'm interested in knowing why you picked Nick Bostrom as the person whose work you'd try and amplify. I like a lot of his work, but he also seems to be one of the figure's whose work (especially Astronomical waste) is being used in "hit pieces" aimed at EA. Is this not potentially increasing the likelihood that someone will hear something they find unpalatable, and form a negative connotation with EA as a result ?

Reply
See in context
by peterhartree
3 min read 5

77

Nick BostromAudio
Frontpage

We've started a project to record audio narrations of the most important papers by Nick Bostrom.

The recordings will be added to nickbostrom.com. They will also be distributed as a podcast with its own website, brand and YouTube channel.

Once we have 10-20 episodes, we'll start promoting the podcast more widely. We'll also get the podcast on the first page of Google for "Nick Bostrom" and related keywords.

✨ The first four episodes are available now! ✨

They are:

  1. The Vulnerable World Hypothesis (2019)
  2. Sharing the World with Digital Minds (2020)
  3. The Fable of The Dragon Tyrant (2005)
  4. Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority (2012)

This project is supported by a grant from the FTX Future Fund Regranting Program.[1]

How to listen

You can subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or by RSS.

You can also search in your favourite podcast app. Please tell us if it doesn't show up for you.

Finally, you can listen online at radiobostrom.com.

About this project

Continue reading if you'd like to know more about this project...

The plan

  • Record high-quality human narrations of ~20 of the most important Bostrom papers (hopefully more).

  • Distribute recordings as as podcast, and via nickbostrom.com

  • Create an "Introduction to Nick Bostrom series" of 5-10 recordings, which becomes one of the best places for people to start engaging with Bostrom's work.

  • Market the podcast and intro series somewhat (perhaps very) ambitiously.[2]

  • (Perhaps, one day) Record high-quality critical discussions of various Bostrom papers or ideas, with invited guests.

Timeline

  • Early August: soft-launch to EA Forum and other stakeholders; seek feedback.

  • August: continue recording 15-20 of Bostrom’s most important papers.

  • Late August or early September: finish 15+ recordings, supporting materials, and release. After that: start the initial marketing push.

Team

  • Peter Hartree, Project Lead
  • Shaun Acker, Narrator
  • Conor Barnes, Assistant Web Developer
  • Chloé Kalonek, Visual identity
  • Katy Moore, Audio-proofing
  • Perrin Walker, Narrator
  • TBC (we're about to hire a third, female narrator)

Matthew van der Merwe and Fin Moorhouse are kindly serving as advisors.

Some ways you can help...

  • (1-5 mins) Subscribe to the podcast, and share it with at least 3 friends who might like it.

  • (1 min) Like and retweet this tweet, so that more people see it.

  • (1-10 mins) Write a 5-star review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. The first few reviews are especially valuable. We'll also find them motivating!

  • (1-2 hours) Listen to an episode and tell us what you like, and how it could be improved. Post here in the comments, or email us.

  • (ongoing) Join the podcast advisory group. You'll get early access to new narrations, and—if you have time—you can listen and give feedback if you notice any issues.

  • (10-60 mins) Tell us which papers should feature in the "Introduction to Nick Bostrom" series, and in what order. We're especially keen for suggestions on what the first three papers should be.

  • (10-60 mins) Share quick thoughts or brainstorms on ideas for marketing the podcast, or suggest someone who could lead on marketing strategy.

  • Share any other thoughts in the comments, or by email.

Want to join the team?

We're looking for someone to help with marketing strategy and execution. You would work closely with Peter Hartree to identify the best opportunities, then make them happen. It'd be a freelance role, competitively paid. You'd help us for 1-2 days ASAP to start with, then 1-2 weeks in late August or early September. You would have a £1-10K marketing budget.

If you're interested, email peter@radiobostrom.com.

If you know someone else who might be interested, please send them a link to this EA Forum post.

    1. There is no formal affiliation between Nick Bostrom and this project. Bostrom has granted us permission to record his papers, and we've heard that he and his team are enthusiastic about the project. ↩︎

    2. Plan for this is TBC, but we'll start when >10 episodes are live, in late August or early September. ↩︎

77

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments5


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Will Aldred7
0
0

Tell us which papers should feature in the "Introduction to Nick Bostrom" series, and in what order. We're especially keen for suggestions on what the first three papers should be.

If the series is to be 3 papers long, I'd suggest:

  1. The Vulnerable World Hypothesis
  2. Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?
  3. The Transhumanist FAQ

If the series is to be a dozen papers long, I'd suggest:

  1. What is a Singleton?
  2. The Future of Human Evolution
  3. The Future of Humanity
  4. The Vulnerable World Hypothesis
  5. The Transhumanist FAQ
  6. Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?
  7. Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development
  8. Where Are They? Why I hope the search for extraterrestrial life finds nothing
  9. A Primer on the Doomsday argument
  10. The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics
  11. Embryo Selection for Cognitive Enhancement: Curiosity or Game-changer?
  12. Sharing the World with Digital Minds
Reply
peterhartree1
0
0

Thanks Will.

One big surprise for me: your suggestion of "What is a Singleton?" as the first paper for someone new to Bostrom. Could you say more about your thinking there?

Reply
bretbernhoft7
0
0

This is pretty cool. Thank you for sharing the Radio Bostrom link.

Reply
peterhartree3
0
0

The "Introduction to Nick Bostrom" series will include ~10 episodes that serve as an introduction to Bostrom's work for people who are totally new or fairly new. If it proves popular, we might one day release it as an audiobook.

Examples of the kind of person I'm trying to appeal to:

  • Young pro-EA at high school or university
  • Policy person working in government
  • Tech entrepreneur
  • AI capabilities researcher
  • …

My current best guess for the series:

  1. Introduction episode
  2. Vulnerable World (Aeon version as part 1, full paper as part 2)
  3. Dragon Tyrant (part 1), then maybe The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics (part 2).
  4. Future of Humanity AND/OR Technological Revolutions: Ethics and Policy in the Dark
  5. Evolutionary Optimality Challenge OR The Future of Human Evolution
  6. Mount Ethics
  7. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
  8. Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate OR Embryo Selection for Cognitive Enhancement: Curiosity or Game-changer? (alternatively: Transhumanism FAQ)
  9. Astronomical Waste
  10. Letter from Utopia
  11. Outro episode
    • ...?
    • Sensible CTAs

Candidates that didn't quite make the cut:

  • Simulation Argument
  • What is a Singleton?
  • Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority
  • Primer on Doomsday argument
  • One or more of Bostrom’s TED talks. Not sure whether to include these. Maybe just mention them as a tl;dl alternative during the intro, and on the intro series web page.

Comments welcome!

Reply
Kaleem-4
0
0

I'm interested in knowing why you picked Nick Bostrom as the person whose work you'd try and amplify. I like a lot of his work, but he also seems to be one of the figure's whose work (especially Astronomical waste) is being used in "hit pieces" aimed at EA. Is this not potentially increasing the likelihood that someone will hear something they find unpalatable, and form a negative connotation with EA as a result ?

Reply
More from peterhartree
105
Nick Bostrom’s new book, “Deep Utopia”, is out today
peterhartree
· · 1m read
6
6
84
Katja Grace: Let's think about slowing down AI
peterhartree
· · 3m read
6
6
91
Some core assumptions of effective altruism, according to me
peterhartree
· · 7m read
9
9
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Neel Nanda
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Relevant opportunities
47
I'm hiring a Research Assistant for a nonfiction book on AI!
Garrison
· · 1m read
2
2
22
Center on Long-Term Risk: Summer Research Fellowship 2025
Center on Long-Term Risk
· · 1m read
0
0
51
AI Moral Alignment: The Most Important Goal of Our Generation
Ronen Bar
· · 10m read
11
11
View more