Given the current state of evaluators, it seems like a good initiative!
A related thought I had:
I wonder how it could be set up so that we do not end up in a "turtles all the way down" situation, where we have an infinite number of evaluators, evaluating other evaluators, evaluating other evaluators... ad infinitum.
At the end of the day, the public will need to TRUST one evaluator.
Given the current state of evaluators, it seems like a good initiative!
A related thought I had:
I wonder how it could be set up so that we do not end up in a "turtles all the way down" situation, where we have an infinite number of evaluators, evaluating other evaluators, evaluating other evaluators... ad infinitum.
At the end of the day, the public will need to TRUST one evaluator.