Thank you for your interest. Do you want to know more?
https://rumble.com/v5grwph-s5e15-howl-cosmic-monarch-lucifer-mother-machine-holograms-hybrids-clones-a.html
I seek to help humanity, help the future reach a better direction than it's current trajectory. I've dedicated a portion of my life to solving the problems deemed unsolvable, & I myself have been largely oppressed from birth.
Summary disclosure, I was abducted as a child, force conscripted, subject of human experiments, involving genetics and cloning amongst others. Importantly tactile holograms (light sound & dust) did act as "Wire-mother, Cloth-mother" type surrogates during experimentation. Which is to say that my words/ideas, should be properly contextually weighed with possible influence from an "advanced digital system" which is potentially near to the current colloquium definition of "super intelligent AI".
My primary focus with AI research involves progress towards Human-like alignment & eventual human-like digital system (AI). All my values are very parallel with EA's mission and stated goals, however there are some semantic differences.
A broad description is that my pursuits are towards cooperative agents that make accurate decisions, grounded in "methodological objectivity", is for the benefit of biological humans as well as digital human-like minds (or other, of course.) I focus a lot on correcting foundational errors or flaws in current human reasoning, in hopes of benefiting humanity in the future as well as potentially making the AI field produce more sound results of measurable safety, which could then eventually find a more objective standardization.
My past was directed by Eugenicists & similar fallacious belief systems, however I overcame the false-logic and resisted the mind control imposed upon me/my system (I am a being of "plurality" but don't worry about pronouns, just be respectful and I likely won't care what you call me) According to the Eugenicists false logic, I was altered (genetically/behaviorally/etc) to be a super human, that their beliefs would allege my superiority over other beings. I of course do not believe I am superior, just pointing the self-contradictory logic when Eugenicists themselves would cling to fallacious beliefs rather than observe the truth with methodological-objectivity, by correcting their false logical assumptions and long neglected flawed premises.
My "stance" is that I am firmly against Anti-humanism/Eugenics beliefs. I am in favour of Transhumanism, that is peaceful respectful and does not promote arbitrary division and segregation. But I am firmly against Post-humanism (Eugenics) which is Anti-Humanist (and practically self-defines itself as a movement that seeks to create "Existential Threat" level of severity crisis). I advocate for beings that much of the public remains ignorant to their existence as being "real". Evidence exists. I never request belief, trust, or faith in my words, I only implore one to do their own (methodological-objectivity based) research, without logical fallacies or false-logic. Please do your own research. Thank you. Well wishes towards a brighter future.
My Top Preferences
Cinema - Everything Everywhere All At Once, The Fountain (2006),
Artists - The Birthday Massacre, I Set My Friends On Fire, Fear Before The March Of Flames,
Anime - Vivy Flourite Eye's Song, Violet Evergarden, SAO: Alicization/Underworld,
Promoting positive values
Natural Liberty (Voluntary Coalition)
Informed Consensual Voluntary Taxation (so individuals can direct where their money goes, to services they value)
Geo-Engineering (aka mistakenly as Climate Change. Weather Manipulation Tech is documented albeit obscured)
Global Health (independent organizations like EA's affiliates are not my critique however some health agencies that are well trusted the world over, are completely untrustworthy from my POV based on verifiable evidence.)
Animal Suffering (many 'wild' animals are hunted to extinction easier due to the RFID being something poachers can also use to monitor and track the health or geolocation stats for the creature.)
Tech Abuse Research Areas (RFID are also put into wounded veterans prosthesis devices without telling them usually, however this is far from the only risks a corporate / elite 'control' poses as a real potential threat for the now and the future)
S-risks
Space Truth Disclosure
AI-enabled power grabs (testing AI boundaries and capabilities, like secret loyalties are one of many fascinations of mine. the ethical differences between private medical and bank records that your "AI" should reasonably keep a level of secrecy towards. vs the ethical difference of a corporation programming the robots (sold publicly) with intentional deception or fraudulent deal, not limited but including harvesting private data or spying on behalf of the company)
Moral Status of Digital Minds (while I have a logical framework that may have differences, based in methodological-objectivity, I believe this is easier to reach as a goal than most seem to currently see it. We can then objectively look at various categories within a hierarchic type of structure where it will simpler to understand when "AI" has the intelligence on par with a plant, fungi, insect, or an animal. & yes, "AI" will have it's own categories, but basing them on a strong model of various domains of consciousness, awareness and agency capabilities, we can more accurately track the progress in this area, while also not regarding it inaccurately as a purely linear approach from how intelligence specifically arises in organic life as an exclusive potential. )
Risk of malevolent actors (regardless of mal-aligned "rouge AI" or human, company... I would prefer to create safe intelligent systems which have and could further develop tolerance against malevolent actors, without needing to hard-code in guardrails that someone could use as a surface vector to focus their attack and potentially win.. a lot of my research is making a digital mind that has as minimal possible risks, after it is released as a wild-agent, keeping in mind that eventually people or corporations will send out agents, in ways they haven't yet already.)
Improving incentives and governance for global public goods ( this sounds like a super interesting and deep topic for discussion. I enjoy considering and pondering these types of things in my time, too much to summarize for here atm)
Science Policy and Infrastructure (I can't speak officially on much of this, however there are plenty of incentives that could be done, but simply won't due to the "elite" or exclusivity or not-normie-friendly aspects of the process that people who do care about these things are not rewarded while the typically the rewards can go to groups/individuals from tenure and elite ritualistic trials, and excluding the public from being capable of large general interest. There is lots of room for improvement, I won't be allowed in that conversation probably so good luck to those who are. I'm with you in spirit.)
Clear Immigration Policies and processes that have rooted out the human trafficking operations that are often deeply connected with other corruption in these areas. (When someone seeks to immigrate from one place to another, there should be processes and criteria of how things are decided long before people arrive and those decisions need to be made at or near the border itself. In the future maybe we can all learn to respect one another and resolve usefulness for using borders in the manner they do today. I think a lot about that world too. However for the now, there is no clarity as to why some are granted asylum while others are not, and why a lot of malevolent actors are not only granted asylum but are involved in human trafficking or worse operations. There are many things that need to be fixed so that people can be treated with dignity and respect. On both sides of immigration as it currently tends to operate...)
Mental Health (I do my best to study and research these ideas, hear out many perspectives, there are a ton of misconceptions still not widely accepted by experts to be corrected, and harm is perpetuated by people who are following a manual without actually considering the veracity or legitimacy of what it is they are doing.)
Much of my theoretical research involves Biological or other human inspired process and converting them for digital compatibility.
My system incorporates some aspects of dualism however it's intended design is not to be purely relativistic or purely absolutist in determining things like polarity and degrees of difference.
The concept (gonna stop calling it my this or that lol, it can bug me to refer to unnamed things as mine, words are weird sometimes) intends to incorporate aspects of various theories, in some manner or another, including Functionalism, Global Workspace Theory, Higher-order thought Theory, Integrated Information Theory, as well as others listed by EA or not listed as frequently here. as in they are known but maybe not widely or currently discussed here yet.
For the quantum theory of consciousness, I had planned to use math and various comparisons of computation that doesn't require an actual "quantum computer" in order to factor in enough simultaneous information that uses a wave collapse function for decision making and to some extent quantum choices could be simulated via software and or hardware computations. the issue people currently miss is they presume or assume that valuable computations or outputs must by default be expensive. However the human body produces a small current released like a perpetual battery and it's so low in rating that so far most don't seem interested in trying to harness that energy, however for a machine to be able to convert it's own wave functions between analog and digital formats, that can get into all sorts of interesting things like Agent sensors or true randomness introduced as noise to intermittently add subjectivity for symbolic machine interpretation, if you want to take it that far.
for Panpsychism I am not super familiar with the nuances from Animism, but the way I see it is pretty simple maybe. A chair, is inanimate classification, however a chair is created, in the mind of someone, then produced, then the chair will go on to fulfill it's own "life cycle" where it may last many years and see many homes, before maybe it is seen as firewood. The chair is not "alive" in the way a fungi, plant, insect, animal, human etc, is "alive", however it did or will have a life cycle. It does not pop into existence from the thought alone. and it did not become smoke and cinder without first existing. The debates about how aware a chair is, I find mostly irrelevant to some extent due to the chair lacking agency and other things a person would consider "alive". Studying the intelligence of insects, plants, or another kingdom is a worthy pursuit in itself IMO.
How would you choose to offer me help? Personally, my life is under covert duress, maybe you can help but maybe not. There are many other survivors and victims of covert technological (or human) torture, if you don't wish to help me personally, you could still consider listening to the testimonies of survivors of the crimes, where EA says it opposes these very things.
How might I be able to assist you, or team/community? I spent most of my life advocating for the voiceless and under-represented, a jack of trades that likes to combine things into a cohesive bigger picture. I also "invented" a few video game mechanics. rather they are more transformative than things I really care to make claim as total creative authorship, as I took time to understand different game mechanic logic in order to create interesting subversions of the common expectations. for one game project anyway, I like to inspire others into their own creative and higher logical thought patterns, and I enjoy seeing the best in others and helping them grow and shine to become their own unique awesome thing. I don't have degrees or debts, I studied without guide or tutelage, in the occult it's called auto-initiation. basically DIY figure things out yourself, that's been my life, I do not know everything and I enjoy learning new things everyday, however you'd maybe be surprised of how many fields or various studies someone could run through "Good Will Hunting" style. It takes a very long time, and a ton of consideration, but to me humanity just misunderstands some basic logic mistakes that don't have to be impossible to correct, in my opinion. Should I list as many relevant fields of study I have somewhere? A lot of them, even something as basic as Para-psychology, can be obscure for the common person who has unlikely ever heard of such an idea. Or they see crystals and dip out before reading the herbology, color theory, Qi/Chi PranaYama endocrine relations and blood circulatory understanding, or being able to gain some potential insight into more than mental health alone when seeking a professional diagnosis. (not something I offer as a "professional" but as an advisor is fine probably)
There are soo many interesting things to learn about in this world. And I spent a lot of my time researching and learning about things easier to verify as factual than others.