Evolution dunking arguments make me hesitate to stance-independent morality. At the same time, I don’t think the denial of stance-independence will destroy the legitimacy of moral reflection. We may still do moral reasoning meaningfully and come up with the best, most plausible moral system to us. But essentially the moral answers, if any, are from by moral thinkers, rather than the objective reality outside their minds. So maybe I am more like a constructivist (not holding a strong opinion and open to change!)