I think it's fair to argue that a democracy that's more responsive to voters may not always bring about good policy. And maybe you're giving an example of a situation where that's true. But I do think it's fair to claim that a democracy that's more responsive to voters—and less responsive to the influence of large corporations—will more often bring about good policy.
I think it's fair to argue that a democracy that's more responsive to voters may not always bring about good policy. And maybe you're giving an example of a situation where that's true. But I do think it's fair to claim that a democracy that's more responsive to voters—and less responsive to the influence of large corporations—will more often bring about good policy.