An important point, Gergo. I also agree with the comments about unpacking “context”. As someone making this transition, I’d find it useful to know what kind of context a role needs, to what depth, and what can be learned after joining.
Understanding AI risks and the landscape is one layer; deeper knowledge of stakeholders, research agendas or ethical questions will depend on the role and organisation. Clearer expectations would help people direct their effort. It’s understandable that a growing field is still working this out, but losing capable people to confusion and disillusionment is a real risk.
An important point, Gergo. I also agree with the comments about unpacking “context”. As someone making this transition, I’d find it useful to know what kind of context a role needs, to what depth, and what can be learned after joining.
Understanding AI risks and the landscape is one layer; deeper knowledge of stakeholders, research agendas or ethical questions will depend on the role and organisation. Clearer expectations would help people direct their effort. It’s understandable that a growing field is still working this out, but losing capable people to confusion and disillusionment is a real risk.