I can relate to lot of what you said. Also, that's an astute point you make about a more extreme approach being unlikely to help in one-on-one situations but having potential for shaping broader culture or changing the discourse.
Here's one specific idea: a public record of how the ultra-rich use their money, which also converts the money they spend on themselves (e.g. on a yacht) into lives that could have been saved had they donated those funds.
I wasn't saying anything about timing or financial / liquidity strategy Zuckerberg should use. Rather, my main point was that Zuckerberg shows no signs of being convinced that either he should take altruism seriously or that, in doing so, EA has a lot to offer.
I can relate to lot of what you said. Also, that's an astute point you make about a more extreme approach being unlikely to help in one-on-one situations but having potential for shaping broader culture or changing the discourse.
Here's one specific idea: a public record of how the ultra-rich use their money, which also converts the money they spend on themselves (e.g. on a yacht) into lives that could have been saved had they donated those funds.
I wasn't saying anything about timing or financial / liquidity strategy Zuckerberg should use. Rather, my main point was that Zuckerberg shows no signs of being convinced that either he should take altruism seriously or that, in doing so, EA has a lot to offer.