Many EAs are of an age to be considering having children, and are looking for information about how this will go.

Unfortunately we live in generally a quite age-segregated society. In past times people would have helped their siblings and cousins raise children, so would be intimately aware of the practical details. Alas, if you only have one sibling, leave your family for Boston when you’re 19 and the Bay Area at 23, and then socialise exclusively with other upwardly-mobile 20-and-30 something-year-olds, you might easily lack this sort of very basic knowledge.

One piece of information several people I have spoken to have found useful is just a breakdown of a typical day as a parent of a toddler (1.5 year old). I think a lot of people are so very unclear about the time requirements that even a single data point can be useful, so here is the situation for us:
 

Weekdays:

  • 7:30: Get baby out of crib, change nappy, run around, quick bit of food, get dressed, go to daycare
  • 8:15 - 17:00: Daycare (playing, art, friends, food, nap etc.)
  • 17:00-18:30: Walk home from daycare, playing in the park, greet dogs in the street etc.
  • 18:30-20:00: Play at home, read books, dinner, bathtime, brush teeth
  • 20:00: Bedtime. She sleeps continuously until morning.

 

Weekends:

  • 7:30: Get baby out of crib, change nappy, etc.
  • 8:00-12:00: Various activities, including park
  • 12:00-15:00: Nap. She sleeps continuously for the duration.
  • 15:00-20:00: Various activities, probably park again
  • 20:00: Bedtime. She then sleeps continuously until morning.

 

Note these are average days; covid has made things a bit worse at times, and things are better when grandparents help out etc. In particular, a newborn will not be able to sleep for 11 hours in a row!

In general when the baby is awake she needs one adult on her - the other can be sleeping, working, cooking etc. While looking after her you'll be able to do a little - e.g. email, slack - but not 'proper' work. Having guests over is great - they help keep you company, it's enjoyable to show off the baby, and she likes meeting new people.

Fortunately she sleeps a lot more than we do. This was aided by sleep training, which as you may be aware is a very controversial practice - some parents regard it as cruel to delay responding to a child at night - but one we have no regrets doing. With children it is always hard to know what is due to luck, or genetics, or your parenting, but we have deliberately invested in an extremely consistent sleep routine and the outcomes have been very good. She is happy to go to sleep, doesn’t cry at night, and is happy when she wakes up.

The combination of daycare plus our daughter being a good sleeper means we actually have a lot of time for independent work. Without one or other of these things things would be more tight.  We could have more 'us' time if we used a TV/iPad, because kids seem to find these hypnotic, but we choose to closely limit screen time. Conversely, we are fortunate enough to have a very good daycare; absent this things would be a little more logistically awkward. Hiring a nanny or an au pair becomes increasingly economic with second, third etc. children. Similarly, you can hire a night nurse to help at night.

Obviously this is focused on couples where both members intend to continue working, but I don’t mean to suggest this is the best lifestyle. Stay at home mums do extremely important work! But that’s not a setup I can shed much light on.

Despite the above caveats, hopefully this is helpful to some people, to at least show one possible (out of many) way of organizing life with a young child.




 

73

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thanks for this breakdown. I'd be curious if other parents here have radically different experiences, especially for kids of different ages.
Also, just to flag that stay at home dads do extremely important work too!

Yeah, I enjoyed the post and am grateful for the data point, but when I read that sentence I was definitely like "huh? ...".

Thanks for sharing!  I'd also like to share my experience, which is quite different from yours, just to give a different perspective.

My currently 15-month old daughter neither sleeps through the night, nor does she nap for 3 hours during daytime.  We currently have on average 2 nightly wake-ups, which varies a bit every day. Sometimes she falls asleep again quickly, sometimes she keeps us awake for several hours. Typically, she naps for 1.5 hours around lunch time.

I talk to many people with kids of a similar age, and there seems to be a very large range of experiences (from 3-year olds frequently waking up 3-4x at night to newborns sleeping through the night from day 1),  so I don't have the impression that we are strong outliers. 

Before I became a parent, I was mentally prepared for a few months of sleep deprivation, but I had no idea that this can go on for years.

Also, I think the daycare situation varies a lot across countries. In Germany (where I live), there are not enough daycare spots for all kids, and I know some parents who had to delay going back to work by several months or even years simply because no daycare spot was available. We were very lucky to find a spot on time, but it's not something everyone (at least here) can count on.

"With children it is always hard to know what is due to luck, or genetics, or your parenting" :-)

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Epistemic status: highly certain, or something The Spending What We Must 💸11% pledge  In short: Members pledge to spend at least 11% of their income on effectively increasing their own productivity. This pledge is likely higher-impact for most people than the Giving What We Can 🔸10% Pledge, and we also think the name accurately reflects the non-supererogatory moral beliefs of many in the EA community. Example Charlie is a software engineer for the Centre for Effective Future Research. Since Charlie has taken the SWWM 💸11% pledge, rather than splurge on a vacation, they decide to buy an expensive noise-canceling headset before their next EAG, allowing them to get slightly more sleep and have 104 one-on-one meetings instead of just 101. In one of the extra three meetings, they chat with Diana, who is starting an AI-for-worrying-about-AI company, and decide to become a cofounder. The company becomes wildly successful, and Charlie's equity share allows them to further increase their productivity to the point of diminishing marginal returns, then donate $50 billion to SWWM. The 💸💸💸 Badge If you've taken the SWWM 💸11% Pledge, we'd appreciate if you could add three 💸💸💸 "stacks of money with wings" emoji to your social media profiles. We chose three emoji because we think the 💸11% Pledge will be about 3x more effective than the 🔸10% pledge (see FAQ), and EAs should be scope sensitive.  FAQ Is the pledge legally binding? We highly recommend signing the legal contract, as it will allow you to sue yourself in case of delinquency. What do you mean by effectively increasing productivity? Some interventions are especially good at transforming self-donations into productivity, and have a strong evidence base. In particular:  * Offloading non-work duties like dates and calling your mother to personal assistants * Running many emulated copies of oneself (likely available soon) * Amphetamines I'm an AI system. Can I take the 💸11% pledge? We encourage A
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Hi everybody! I'm Conor. I run the 80,000 Hours Job Board. Or I used to. As of today — April 1 — we are becoming Job Birds! We've been talking to users for the last few years about making this change, and people have overwhelmingly been in favour (remember, there are six or more birds for every human on Earth). Whether it's the daily emails asking me to finally switch, or the flocks of people accosting me at conferences to urge a migration to Job Birds, the demand is overwhelming! Luckily, the wait is over! I've included an FAQ below of the most common questions we receive. FAQ * Do these birds have jobs? * In a sense, no. In another, preferred sense, definitely! They have roles in ecological niches. * What's a good bird to get started with? * The peregrine falcon. * What's the theory of change? * Birds are fascinating creatures. * Birds are the only living animals with feathers. * Birds have hollow bones, which help facilitate flight. * Some bird species, such as parrots and corvids, display remarkable intelligence. * What was the question again? * Caw! Caw! * I have concerns about wild animal suffering. How does Job Birds intend to navigate promoting birds of prey? * The humans behind Job Birds share these concerns. Unfortunately, birds of prey we've spoken to overwhelmingly ascribe to an incompatible, sort of Avi-Nietzschean value system. Owl contractors are in the process of building a moral parliament tool in order to manage these conflicting normative claims. * I worry that sharing birds with people isn't as impactful as sharing jobs. * Okay, but consider this: you can click the media buttons to even hear the sounds of the bird! * I would like to do good with my career. Can Job Birds help me with that? * Users report that job hunting can be stressful and time-intensive. In light of this, we at Job Birds recommend breaking up your job hunts with some time learning about the wonders of over 1,000 bird species at 80,000
Recent opportunities in Community
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read