Hide table of contents

Many people wish EA was better at communicating with non-EA audiences and want to help, but aren’t sure how. We offer a few options below. 

If you’re unfamiliar with Good Impressions, our website is here and we’ve also provided some additional information below. 

1. Submit your ideas for EA communications projects

Do you have an idea for an impactful EA communications project? Is there something you wish someone would do to improve EA communications? 

These could be projects that help organizations involved in EA causes, the causes themselves, or EA as a whole. 

Submit your idea and we will consider pursuing it or finding someone else to pursue it. 

Submit your idea here

2. Submit referrals for experienced marketing or communications professionals 

We are looking for marketing or communications professionals to bring additional types of expertise to our team, either in an advising capacity or through a more formal arrangement. Currently, we support clients with paid ads, website optimization, and web analytics. 

Familiarity with EA is not necessary for these roles (we list separate roles for EA generalists below).

Submit your referrals hereApply here

3. Apply to work at Good Impressions

We have several open roles for generalists and experienced communicators alike. 

Roles for EA generalists:

  • Project Manager
    • We have more demand for projects than we have capacity to run them and Project Managers are the current bottleneck.
    • No marketing experience is required.
  • Podcast Producer (contractor)
    • We’re looking for someone to create one or two podcasts that highlight people doing inspiring work to improve the world. 

Roles for people with professional experience in marketing or communications:

  • Various Roles for Experienced Marketers or Communicators
    • We’re looking for marketing or communications professionals to support our clients with specialties beyond our current expertise (which is in paid ads, website optimization, and web analytics).
  • Visual Content Designer (contractor)
    • We're looking for professionals who can learn complex content, transform it into simple, clear, and personalized messages, and create platform-specific images or videos that represent those messages in a way that grabs the user's attention.

About Good Impressions

Good Impressions is a digital marketing agency that has helped ~60 effective nonprofits, think tanks, and foundations increase engagement with their content, research, services, courses, contests, programs, fellowships, and events. We are funded by Longview Philanthropy and Open Philanthropy and work primarily with organizations focused on making sure AI is safe, mitigating biosecurity risks, improving the lives of farmed animals, helping people living in extreme poverty, and building the Effective Altruism community.

Expanding our theory of change

Until recently, our theory of change has been limited to “topping up” the impact of effective nonprofits by increasing engagement with projects they’ve already created. Our experience is that the EA community often launches important projects without putting significant energy into making sure the right people engage with those projects and this has led to some significant opportunities for impact, including: 

  • Recruiting ~220 participants for BlueDot Impact's courses, including employees from OpenAI, Meta's RLHF team, and the WHO Assistant Director General
  • Increasing Epoch AI’s Twitter followers by ~3.4x among users who work at top AI labs, governmental bodies, major media outlets, and think tanks, which Epoch says "could have a significant impact on our ability to achieve our goals as an organization"
  • Recruiting 7 whistleblowers for Legal Impact for Chickens at 1% of the cost of running undercover investigations
  • Setting up a newsletter program for the Center for AI Safety that is generating ~2,000 new subscriptions per month
  • Increasing Asterisk's readership by 80% for their 2nd issue
  • Improving the Google search results for "longtermism" by creating content that ranks at the top of the search results page
  • Selling ~2,000 copies of The Precipice on Amazon for ~$20 per book
  • Setting up the Google Ads Grant for 35 EA orgs, generating ~1 million free clicks per year 

Recently, we have expanded our theory of change to include projects focused on EA as a whole, as opposed to individual nonprofits. We did this because it has become apparent that there is significant interest in communications projects among EA decision-makers (e.g. “Brand” was one of the two themes of this year’s Meta Coordination Forum) and we think we are in a good position to pursue this work. We have begun investigating projects involving podcasts, social media content, and other storytelling mediums and will use the ideas and leads from this post to decide which of those projects to pursue. 

108

4
0
4

Reactions

4
0
4

More posts like this

Comments8


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Is it possible to share more about how you recruited seven whistleblowers for Legal Impact for Chickens? I'm even more curious after reading the testimonial of LIC's founder on your site, who says it's a very difficult thing to do.

Absolutely - We ran Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ads within a 5-10 mile radius of factory farms asking poultry workers if they wanted to help. There's more to it than that but that's the basic approach. 

Setting up the Google Ads Grant

A good reminder how much software is free for nonprofits: https://kindful.com/blog/free-nonprofit-software/

Would love to hear what other software you use/recommend!

Woah!!! Those are some awesome impact stories 😱 I found the top three particularly impressive.

"Recruiting ~220 participants for BlueDot Impact's courses, including employees from OpenAI, Meta's RLHF team, and the WHO Assistant Director General"

That's wild! Nice job!

Thanks so much for these kind words! BlueDot has been very involved which has been a big part of why their campaigns have been so successful. 

I'm curious if you have general advice (top 3 tips? common mistakes?) for EA orgs who are just starting to experiment with more marketing.

No pressure, of course!

The biggest one is probably to start thinking about how you'll get the right people to engage with your project  (research, content, services, courses, contests, programs, fellowships, events) before you've finished creating that project.  

Why: 

  • Engagement has a multiplicative effect for most projects (if you 2x the number or quality of people who read your research, you've probably 2xd the impact of your research)
  • Thinking this through ahead of time will often change the product itself (e.g. if you were going to do an event for people in biotech but then learn you only really have access to people at a specific company, your event should be tailored specifically to that company)
  • If you need vendor support, it can be hard to find and there may be waitlists (e.g. we have a backlog of a few months)

Thank you for the thoughtful reply!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr